President Bush Needs to be Educated on Real Islam

Recently President Bush became the first president to appoint a special envoy to the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC), which represents 57 Muslim countries. This appointment is just another strategy step in his "war on terror" campaign. His plan includes the willful attempt to appease as much as possible what he thinks to be the non-radical Muslims of the world. When the President is not off visiting a mosque in order to call Islam a "religion of peace" at every chance he gets, he's sending Condolisa Rice to the Middle East to push for the Roadmap plan to appease the Saudis and the rest of the Islamic world in hopes that they'll support the war campaign in Iraq.

If it wasn't for congress putting their foot down, Bush's Islamic Appeasment Plan (a.k.a. "War on Terror") would have allowed a company out of Dubai to be in charge of our seaport security. This was the same city from which the Pakistani named A.K. Khan distributed his nuclear products into other Muslim countries. The question then becomes, will this "appeasement of Muslims" strategy work in the best interest of the United States (a.k.a. the great Satan) and for our strongest ally in the Middle East and in the world, Israel (a.k.a. the little Satan)?

The answer is absolutely "no" because America can in no way change the inner nature of the Islamic world as a whole! Also, true peace in the Middle East cannot come about when trying to build that peace upon a foundation of lies, and any success you might have initially will only be short lived. President Bush makes the tragic mistake of thinking that Islam is just another religion like Christianity where it can be separated from the government, and that Islamic governments can be democratized. They can't.

Islam has its own political ideology within the religion itself and it's by far a democratic one. President Bush obvious believes that the Islamic culture as a whole, operates in the same goals and mindset along the same lines of Western values even believing that Mohammed was a proponent of democracy in his day. It is a mistake to believe that the Islamic world will be satisfied with what the average Westerner would be satisfied with.

In Islam there are only two worlds: Dar al-Islam (the world of Islam) and Dar al-harb (the world that is at constant war with the world of Islam - namely the Western nations). There is no "can't we all just get along" in between! Any government operating outside of sharia law that includes "freedom of religion" undermines the Islamic Dar al-harb / Dar al-Islam concepts. If you are not a Muslim, then you are part of the Dar al-harb that every Muslim has the duty to jihad against and that jihad must continue until every religion falls subject to Allah (Koran: sura 8:39). Any appeasement that is given to Islamic demands (such as a Palestinian state in the ancient homeland of Israel) is seen as a Dar al-harb weakness that is mentioned in the Koran, and only contributes to Dar al-Isalm in its jihad against Dar al-harb.

On September 17, 2001 just six days after the tragedy of 9/11, President Bush addressed the nation from the Islamic Center of Washington, D.C. while Islamic leaders were gathered around him. There he attempted to reassure the American people that Islam is a peaceful religion instead of the very religion of the 9/11 terrorist. He starts off by saying, “These acts of violence against innocents violate the fundamental tenets of the Islamic faith. And it's important for my fellow Americans to understand that.”

Right away questions start going off in my head as I heard this willfully ignorant statement coming from our president’s lips. First of all, how is George W. Bush being the kafir (unbeliever) that he is, qualified to make any such statement about fundamental tenets of Islam? Just how much, and how often, and from what sources has this man studied Islam in ideology, culture, and history? How familiar is he with what the major learning institutions and noted religious schools of Islam teaches their own people in these categories? Does his election into an office of a Christian nation by the vast majority of Christians somehow vindicate him as some sort of an expert on Islam?

What is really important for his fellow Americans to know is that Muhammad spread his Islam throughout Arabia according to the Islamic historian Ibn Ishaq (703-773) by the way of 27 jihads, banishment, stealing lands and property, and political assassinations. They need to know that many times throughout the Koran and hadiths Mohammad used the term "cast terror in their hearts" concerning those who opposed his message. And who are the ones doing the casting of terror into their hearts? Could it possibly be the "terrorist"?

So much for violent acts upon the innocent being against the tenets of Islam, for it is through the actions of Mohammad that the Islamic law (sharia) culture, and ideology stems. I have news for President Bush; the Arabic word "jihad" is not a new invention of the Islamic terrorist! Islam is a word that is deeply embedded within Islam as a religion, the Koran as Islam's most holiest book, the authoritative hadiths, and of course Islam's long history and culture.

Instead of calling Islam peaceful, President Bush's "war on terrorism" should include the very tenets of Islam that does cause violent acts (terrorism) against the innocent! Bush needs to realize that any war on terror is in reality a war of civilizations and that the war on terror naturally should included the very foundation of Islam itself! Oh, that would be too politically incorrect and it might even offend the oil-supplying Saudis who just so happens to purchase 80% of Britain's arm sales. Is the West suppose to try to put out the flames of terrorism by spraying the tip of its flames instead of spraying the base of its fire, right Mr. President?

There can be a lot said about Islam being a religion of peace. There is not one of the 9/11 hijackers nor any other Islamic terrorist in the world that would disagree with President Bush concerning Islam being a religion of peace. Bush's kafir-democratic depiction of Islam and the true Allah-submitters (Muslims) depiction of Islam of just how they are peaceful are what are worlds apart. Take a look at the following excerpt from an Islamic radical named Sayyid Quib (know as the Martin Luther of Islam) and notice his inspiration behind his words that is sure to ignite the jihadic seed laying dormant within the seemingly peaceful moderate Muslim:

The Jihad of Islam is to secure complete freedom for every man throughout the world by releasing him from servitude to other human beings so that he may serve Allah……This is in itself a sufficient reason for Jihad. These were the only reasons in the hearts of Muslims warriors. If they had been asked the question, “Why are you fighting ?” none would have answered, “My country is in danger; I’m fighting for its defense,” or, “The Persians and the Romans have come upon us” or, “We want to extend our dominion and want more spoils.”
They would have answered the same as Rabai bin Amer, Huzaifa bin Muhsin and Mughir abin Sh’ba answered the Persian General Rustum when he asked them one by one during three successive days preceding the battle of Qadisiyyah: “For what purpose have you come?” Their answer was the same: “Allah has sent us to bring anyone who wishes from servitude to men into the service of Allah alone, from the narrowness of this world into the vastness of this world and the Hereafter, and from the tyranny of religions into the justice of Islam. Allah raised a messenger for this purpose to teach his creatures his way. If anyone accepts this way of life, we turn back and give his country back to him, and we fight with those who rebel until we are martyred or become victorious.”
…The reason for Jihad exists in the nature of its message and in the actual conditions it finds in human societies, and not merely in the necessity for defense…
Those who say that Islamic Jihad was merely for defense of the “homeland of Islam” diminish the greatness of the Islamic way of life and consider it less important than their ‘homeland’. This is not the Islamic point of view, and their view is a creation of the modern age and is completely alien to Islamic consciousness.”

After giving his remarks of defending the fundamentals tenets of Islam, Bush then began to quote a text out of the Koran as if he was well versed in the Koran and just happened to pull out a verse that he personally thought would be appropriate for such an Islam-defending occasion and to convince the American people that Islam is truly not what the terrorist of 9/11 are all about:
“The English translation is not as eloquent as the original Arabic, but let me quote from the Koran, itself: In the long run, evil in the extreme will be the end of those who do evil. For that they rejected the signs of Allah and held them up to ridicule.”

I’m sure the mullahs and imams of the whole Islamic world got a great huge laugh out of seeing this ignorant president of the United States quote a condemning passage from the Koran that actually pertains to himself! Bush quoted Sura 30:10 referring it to the 9/11 terrorist, which in fact refers to the Quraysh tribesmen who were not accepting Muhammad's new religion.
In this passage of the Koran, it is speaking of the judgment day to come where all those who have rejected the Islamic god of Allah (including George W. Bush - the “W” perhaps should stand for ‘willfully rejecting Allah’).

According to the text these unbelievers will have evil (hell’s flames) put on them. I would venture to bet that Bush has never even read, or much less, has never studied the Koran and its corresponding hadith. He certainly didn't know the context of the verse he quoted. On that day that President Bush was addressing the nation, just six days after the 9/11 attacks, Bush was probably given a verse from the Koran at his request that he could read to the American people that in his mind would show how Islam amongst all the terrorist tragedy, was still indeed a religion of peace. I would further bet that the verse was given him by some Muslim cleric who inwardly would like to see America be subjected to sharia law. If Bush had been a Koran reader he would have known that the context he referred to would include himself as a “non-believer” in Islam. It is just two and six verses later of sura 30:10 that it becomes very clear who the Koran depicts as to who these “evil doers” are:

And the Day when the hour comes, the guilty will despair. Those who disbelieved and rejected our messages (non-Muslims) and the meeting of the Hereafter, they will be given over to punishment. - Sura 30:12,16

What Bush needs is ex-Muslims like Walid Shoebat or Mark A. Gabriel on his advisory board. Maybe then he might be able to understand that the terrorist are the true torch-bearers of the Islamic religion and not the so-called, ever-so-silent moderates. There is a reason why the jihadist scream louder than the moderates to the place that they are willing to die for their religion, and it's not because they have a simple misunderstanding of the Koran and hadith. No, you will never find a suicide bomber who is moderately into their Koran. However, you will find them making their farewell video holding a Koran in one hand and a machine-gun or a grenade in the other.

As long as Bush continues to believe that the US foreign policy can somehow change Islam's long violent history where Mohammad's jihadic nature as the excellent example to the Muslim believers is unconsidered among Muslim believers, he will reap the Islamic-radical advancement both here and abroad. Hamas took full control of Gaza because Bush ignorantly envisioned a Palestinian state living side by side in peace with Israel, which would be totally un-Islamic in the first place! In trying to please the Saudis, Bush pressured Israel to make Gaza Jew-free. Gaza in return became Hamas-full, where Allah was praised due to American and Israeli weaknesses.

The sad part is that anyone with just a little knowledge of the Koran and hadith could foresee Gaza's outcome from a mile off. President Bush would perhaps be a lot better off in his decision-making towards national security and the Middle East if he knew his Koran only half as much as he let on to know it, just six days after 9/11?

The Spiritual Link Between Nazism and Islam Via the Husayni Connection

When Nazism is compared with Islamic societies a few things will immediately begin to appear in correlation between the two. For instance, when I began studying the conduct of the Nazis, I started noticing a two-word phrase that kept popping up that was very common in their mass political rallies and also in their salutes during smaller gatherings. It was the phrase “Sieg Heil” meaning: “Hail (to) Victory”. There were many occasions when the Nazi crowds would chant this repetitively several times, each time louder and louder, working themselves into a frenzy to achieve a Nazi high. There is an Islamic version of Nazism's “Sieg Heil”. It is “Allahu Akbar” meaning “god is greatest”. They too will use this two-word chant to work themselves into a frenzy to achieve an Islamic high. This phrase is so common among Muslims that the phrase itself has its own title called “Takbir” and it is written on the national flags of Iraq and Iran.

When the Nazi speakers called out for the destruction of the Jews at political rallies “Seig Heil” was chanted loudly and repeatedly by the large audiences. Today when Imams and mullahs call out for the destruction of the Jews during their Friday sermons “Allahu Akbar” is chanted loudly and repeatedly by their audiences! However, this Islamic chant runs deeper than that of the Nazis, due to the “god” factor that comes into play. As the former Palestinian terrorist Walid Shoebat has stated, “Islam is Nazism with a religious twist”. This is what makes the sin of Islam more evil than the Nazis. It is one thing to oppress, maim, and butcher for a man-made vision and ideology, but to do the same evil in the name of “God” causes the sin to reach far deeper into the soul and therefore is far more damnable in the eternities.

You shall not take (“carry“ in the original Hebrew) the Name of YHVH your God in vain. For YHVH will not hold him guiltless that takes (carries) His Name in vain. - Exodus 20: 7

Before comparing the Nazis with the world of Islam, there are at least three questions that needs to be asked.

1. To whom did the world of Islam support during the years the Nazis were in operation, the allied forces or the Nazis and the Axis of Evil? This is a very simple question in which the correct answer supplies volumes of information about the whole of Islam! The Islamic world supported Nazism largely in part to the West’s support of the 1917 Belfour Declaration that recognized the need for the Jewish state in Palestine. However, their embracing a Nazi victory only showed what was truly in their hearts all along, and it demonstrates exactly what the Islamic world is capable of when they don’t receive what they religiously want. This rings ever so clear in the words of a Egyptian minister named Anwar Sadat who was raised in the so-called "moderate" Islamic culture of Egyptian society and would later become the religiously “moderate” president of Egypt itself.

"My dear Hitler, I congratulate you from the bottom of my heart. Even if you appear to have been defeated, in reality you are the victor. You succeeded in creating dissensions between Churchill, the old man, and his allies, the Sons of Satan. Germany will win because her existence is necessary to preserve the world balance. Germany will be reborn in spite of the Western and Eastern powers. There will be no peace unless Germany once again becomes what she was."- Anwar Sadat

2. To whom would the world of Islam (including all its so-called moderates) give their overall support to between the West and another Axis of Evil today under the same or similar circumstances?
An indicator might be the fact that Jordan, the Palestinians, and all other Islamic countries not effected by Saddam Hussein's war threat, ended up supporting this Hitler of the Middle East over the United States during the Gulf War.

3. Out of all the religions of the world, (and there are many) which would most religiously express their religious joy, as a whole, if America and the West was completely destroyed?
Before answering this question, one must consider the fact that the destruction of the capitalistic West was the very the goal of Hitler and the Axis of Evil.

Jewish hatred is the binding force that unites all God-haters for a particular cause. Regardless of difference of race, sex, age, religion, wealth, culture, that under normal circumstances would naturally separate people, anti-Semitism has a spiritual uniting force that knows no boundaries. David Duke and Louis Farrakhan are two men that are worlds apart when it comes to world politics and racial ideology. Both men are deeply devoted racists and would bitterly oppose one another on every white and black issue except for one - the Jews. This is where their God-hatred kicks in and they can come to a racial /spiritual related agreement. David Duke hates all the Jews including the white European Jewry while Louis Farrakhan hates all the Jews including the black Falasha Jewry.

This same God-hatred that unites Duke and Farrakhan is what unites Nazism ideology and Islam’s ideology, expressed in the form of “Jew-hatred”! Only a spiritual answer can give a satisfying answer to this phenomenon. Only through a spiritual concept can one understand the reasons why Hitler and Nazi Germany who with the help of Western Europe was so deadly determined to annihilate the Jews, and why this Jewish-annihilation ideology principle continues long after the Nazis in the mindset of the religiously minded Arab / Muslim world.

Can Islam and Nazism be spiritually linked together? Is there a spiritual connection as to why the president of the National Socialist Movement (a Neo-Nazi movement) David Myatt after converting to Islam (becoming a man of faith) could still maintain that the Holocaust was a "Zionist" hoax after his conversion to Islam? To help answer these questions I give you the holy and authoritative sahih sittah (meaning: from the reliable and sound collections) hadith:

“The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim or servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him” - Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj al-Qushari ( 821 - 873 AD) Book 41 No. 6985

Haj Amin Al-Husayni - Palestinian Grand Mufti of Jerusalem

Hitler probably knew about this hadith and others like it from the close friend and long-time admirer of the Third Reich who came to visit him on November 21, 1941. Amin al- Husayni was a Palestinian national that was appointed for the city of Jerusalem to be the grand Mufti (an Islamic scholar who interprets, expounds, and issues decrees - fatwas, in sharia law). Al-Husayni also had held the title of "President of Supreme Muslim Council of Palestine". As the holder of this high religious office, he helped instigate riots against the Jews during the 1920's and was religiously instrumental in the horrific massacre-butchering of many Jewish people in the city of Hebron in 1929.

In 1933, just weeks after Hitler became chancellor of Germany, Husayni sent a telegram to the Nazis via the German Consul-General in Palestine, expressing his joy over their coming to power and offered his support in spreading their ideology (Jew-free ideology) throughout the Middle East, especially in Palestine. This was just the beginning for Husayni. Because he was very, very religious in his study of Islamic law he wanted to do a lot more for his friend of Islam called Nazism. Just how much inspiration and devotion did this Grand Mufti have towards his faith? His life's work can answer that question:

In 1941, after being run out of Palestine by the British, Husayni ended up in Iraq where as a Mufti he declared a pro-Axis fatwas against the British allied forces that resulted in pro-Nazi Iraqis controlling Baghdad with Hitler supporting their jihad effort.

Also in 1941, the Mufti’s visit with Hitler for the purpose of diverting the Palestine-bound Jews to Poland death camps, came just two months before the Wannsee Conference that set in motion the “Finial Solution” that called for the death of eleven million Jews in all of Europe. On September 21st. 1944 Husayni stated in a Berlin broadcast: "Is it not in your power, O Arabs, to repulse the Jews who number not more than eleven million?"

Before the war it was common knowledge the Jews numbered 17-18 million world-wide. When doing the math of the murdered Jews at the end of the war during the time his broadcast was made, it is obvious that this religious motivated Mufti had full knowledge of the “Finial Solution” and had discussed it with Hitler, members of the Wannsee Conference, and other leading Nazi officials while giving his full support of this “Finial Solution”!

Since the Jew-hating, Nazi-loving, Islamic apologists will argue on Husayni’s behalf as to his knowledge of the Final Solution, there is another point to his “eleven million Jews” quote I want to make and that is; what does it say spiritually about any man who was inspired to make a radio broadcast from within the Nazi-Germany borders about “repulsing all the Jews” while at the very same time of this 1944 broadcast Nazi-Germany was in the process of sending Jewish men, women, children, and infants who had been tortured, beaten, and starved to the gas chambers, gallows, ovens, and crematoriums? In other words, what does it say about this man’s religion that produced such vile hatred within him to cause him to speak against the Jews while they're being slaughtered, on behalf of the Nazis who was doing the slaughtering, while in Germany, the very place where the slaughtering was designed and took place?

Husayni not only supported the Holocaust but contributed to it a great deal. He was persistently protesting the German government along with the governments of Italy, Hungary, Bumania, and Bulgari to not allow their Jews to emigrate (“escape” in his words) to Palestine. And just what did he suggest that they do with them? In a letter of request to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Hungary, dated June 28, 1943, Husayni wrote:

….To authorize these Jews to leave your country under the above circumstances and in this way, would by no means solve the Jewish problem and would certainly not protect your country against their evil influence - far from it! - for this escape would make it possible for them to communicate and combine freely with their racial brethren in enemy countries in order to strengthen their position and to exert a more dangerous influence….
…This is the reason why I ask your Excellency to permit me to draw your attention to the necessity of preventing the Jews from leaving your country for Palestine and if there are reasons which make their removal necessary, it would be indispensable and infinitely preferable to send them to other countries where they would find themselves under active control, for example, in Poland, in order thereby to protect oneself from their menace and avoid the consequent damages.

Husayni wanted the Hungarian Jews inside of Poland rather than Palestine. I wonder why Poland of all places? What kind of activities were going on in Poland in 1943 that this Islamic Mufti-fatwa-giver knew about and wanted the Jews to participate in? The United Nations added their own note to this document that read: "As a Sequel to This Request 400,000 Jews Were Subsequently Killed." Other such requests to other countries would result in thousands of more Jewish lives including thousands of Jewish children. Just one month earlier on May 6,1943 Husayni suggested to the Bulgarian foreign minister that Bulgarian-Jewish “children” should be sent to Poland rather than to Palestine.

From the 1946 Nurenberg trials Dieter Wisliceny (Adolph Eichmann's deputy) stated:
"The Mutfi was one of the initiators of the systematic extermination of European Jewry and had been a collaborator and adviser of Eichmann and Himmler in the execution of this plan. He was one Eichmann's best friends and had constantly incited him to accelerate the extermination measures. I heard him say (accompanied by Eichmann) he had visited incognito, the gas chambers of Auschwitz."

Husayni occupied his time in Germany by working for the Nazis as a propagandist for the Arabs and recruited Muslim volunteers for the German armed forces. In 1943, Husayni recruited for the Nazis that became divisions of the Waffen SS and other units that participated in the hunting down and killing of Jewish victims. Husayni's main recruitment gift to the Nazis was the 20,000 Bosnian-Muslim 13th. Waffen-SS Division Hanjar (Hanjar meaning "saber"). Part of their task in the war was to maintain the railway line from Balkans to Auschwitz.

It is interesting to note when comparing Nazism with Islam that these recruits of Husayni wore a patch on their uniform that signified the sword of Islam along with the swastika. In an acknowledgment of Husayni's grand efforts, Heinrich Himmler (second only to Hitler himself) has been quoted as saying: "Muslims responded to the call of Muslim leaders and joined our side because of their hatred of our joint Jewish-English-Bolshevik enemies, and because of their belief and respect for, above all -- Our Fuhrer."

Here is what can drawn from Husayni’s (spiritual) legacy:

• He was a deeply religious devoted man to his Islam. He was a very influential individual with the title of “Grand Mufti” of the holiest city in the world - Jerusalem, where he issued religious fatwas (judgments and decrees) that the Muslims in the region greatly respected.
• He hated Jews as part of his deep religious devotion by which he was very adamant. On March 1, 1944, while speaking on Radio Berlin, al-Husayni said: “Arabs, rise as one man and fight for your sacred rights. Kill the Jews wherever you find them. This pleases Allah, history, and religion. This saves your honor. Allah is with you.” I would venture to say that his Jew-hatred was equal, if not surpassed to that of Adolph Hitlers’ own Jew-hatred. The only difference being that Husayni did not have access to the death production capabilities that Hitler had.
• Germany, the home of Nazism and all of its Holocaust atrocities better suited al-Husayni for a place for him to also call “home” until after the war had ended. Nazi Germany better suited him for expressing his religion, his honor, sacred rights, and worship to his god Allah, rather than those of Western countries with Western values. Husayni stayed in Nazi Germany from 1941 until the Nazis were defeated and ended up living out his days in the Islamic terrorist-state of Syria.
• His life, his devotion, his religious learning, and his religious titles, demonstrates without a doubt that there is a spiritual link between Nazism and Islam. Husayni was the embodied expressed "go between" Nazism and Islam. He stood for everything that true Islam does, to which he was a credit to his religion. To this day Huasyni carries a good name throughout the modern Islamic world even being called "the voice of the Palestinian people" and a Palestinian "hero"!
• Hitler’s part in the Holocaust came from being a racially-minded psychopath, but Husayni’s part in the Holocaust came straight from his Islam, his Koran, and his god Allah!

When Iranian president Mahmoud Amidinijad asks why should the Palestinians pay (tolerate a Jewish state) for something that Germany did, the answer to his question (laying aside God's eternal covenant of the Jews of which is not reliant on the Holocaust) lies in the spiritual likeness between his Islam and Nazism! The Holocaust works of Husayni that consisted of his spiritual and physical deeds as a Jerusalem-based Palestinian religious Mufti played a huge role in Hitler's Jew-murdering methods. Therefore, the majority of Palestinians who supported him - as they do to this very day - are guilty of aiding the Holocaust! Their punishment for aiding and the greatest crime known to mankind should be the Jewish State of Israel ruling over all of what they call "their land".

Even today modern Islamic fatwas follow in the same footsteps of Nazi ideology concerning Jew-murder - even "child" Jew-murder. This fact demonstrates the spiritual link of unity between the two. The following comparison should send chills down the back of all those who oppose Jewish mass-murder:

"There is a fatwah, a religious ruling that says it is OK that we must kill Jewish embryos in the belly of their mothers because later they will be Israeli soldiers. And those fatwahs are spread in Europe, spread by certain fundamentalist Imams. The youngster, who goes to Mosque on Fridays, when he hears this wherever he might be, he wants to obey that ruling. Which means that the danger is no longer in the Middle East. It is here (Europe)."
- Morad El Hattab, Author and critic of Islamic extremism From the documentary, "Ever Again" © 2005 Moriah Films
.
Now, compared that "Fatwah" to "Nazi" Ideology:
U.S. Army Psychiatrist Leon Goldensohn: “How did you figure a six-month-old Jewish infant must be killed?”
Otto Ohlendorf (Commander of Einsatzgruppen D): “In the (Jewish) child we (the Nazis) see the grown-up.” - 1946, Nuremberg, Germany

Among the true followers of Islam today (the so-called radicals) mutations of Nazism can be easily found. While skinhead neo-Nazis are just wanna-be hoodlums who live in the “Sieg Hail” past of the Third Reich, the ones with the true Nazi spirit of today come yelling “Allahu Akbar”! It is not just my opinion that Nazism and Islam are spiritually linked, it was al-Husayni's opinion as well. After meeting with Hitler in November, 1941 al-Husayni stated that the Germans "know how to get rid of the Jews, and that brings us close to the Germans and set us in their camp."

Case Closed!

Twenty Questions to Ask a "Moderate" Muslim

Can there be non-terrorist / non anti-Semitic Muslims in Islam? Sure there can be. Just as Oscar Schindler who being a member and a major player within the Nazi party was not inwardly an anti-Semite but one who actually had compassion for the Jewish people, there are perhaps some within the peoples of Islam who like Schindler are not anti-Semitic as well. However, it would be a terrible mistake to judge the religion of Islam based upon such a tiny minority of Muslims rather than Mohammad, the Koran, the hadiths, the Islamic history and culture, just as it would be a mistake to judge Nazism based upon the life of Oscar Schindler rather than Adolph Hitler, the entire Nazi party, and the Holocaust. It boils down to Oscar Schindler not being a "true" Nazi even though he wore a Nazi pin and was officially part of the Nazi Party.

Based upon what I've learned of "true sharia Islam" I believe that there are no "true moderate Muslims" in the world of Islam based upon the same principle that there were no "true" moderate Nazis within Nazism. Moderate Muslims are like the Mexican Chupacabras, the existence of such beings are only real within the mythological world, and not in a world of reaity. In order for there to be true moderate Muslims there would have to be a true moderate Islam, but there is not! What would appear to be moderate Muslims are those who use a moderate-Muslim deception (tekiyah in Arabic) and those who are simply non-devoted and or uneducated of the life of their warlord-prophet and his terrorist-based religion!

As the human body can be carriers of a disease such as TB or inactive AIDS without obvious symptoms, I believe every so-called moderate Muslim is a carrier and has the potential of becoming what true Islam really is, which is a terrible spiritual disease that can kill the soul. Most radical Muslims (the devoted and literal followers of the Koran and Hadiths) were once carriers (moderates) before becoming "full blown" in the mind with this terrorist religion. There are ways to diagnose the tendencies of true Islam within the moderate mindset. The answers to the right questions will allow appearance into the subconscious that will reveal that the moderate Muslim really isn't so moderate after all.

If you do ask challenging questions to a Muslim, watch for five things:

1. Their facial expressions (if possible).
   
2. How careful they are in wording their response. Usually this is a sign of tekiyah being used to protect Islam.
   
3. Their total avoidance on certain issues which is another sign of tekiyah in use.
4. Their overall anger and frustration at being exposed.
   
5. How quickly they are to answer no more questions once they have learned what their answers to your questions are leading to.

I've come up with "twenty questions" that I believe will help squeeze-out the hidden radicalism that lies within most all so-called moderate Muslims! These questions can best be used for "call-in" television and radio talk shows who are interviewing tekiyah-spokespersons from organizations such as:

• C.A.I.R. Council on American-Islamic Relations > http://www.cair.com/Home.aspx
• I.C.A. Islamic Center of America > http://www.icofa.com/
• O.I.C. Organization of Islamic Conference> http://www.oic-oci.org/home.asp
• M.S.A. National - Muslim Student Association > http://www.msanational.org/
• M.A.S. Muslim American Society > http://www.masnet.org/
  
• I.S.N.A. Islamic Societies of North America > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Society_of_North_America
  
• A.M.A.N.A. American Muslim Association of North America > http://al-amana.net/home/
  

Twenty Simple Questions

1. Since the 9/11 hijackers died in transgression (sura 9:84) is it fair to say they went to the Allah prepared hell for their suicide /murderous acts?
Follow up question:
Did Allah, whom the 9/11 hijackers praised by yelling the words "Allahu akbar" as they sacrificed their lives to and for him, prepare a burning fire for all the "non-believers" that were murdered on 9/11 in accordance with sura 48:13 1 and Sura 98:6 2 concerning non-believers?

2. Was the events of 9/11 carried out by Islamic extremist or by the Zionists to make Islam look bad? > http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29849

Follow up questions:

• Did approximately 4,000 Jews avoid going to work on the day of 9/11 because they were "tipped off" by the Israeli government about the attack that they had orchestrated?
  http://www.adl.org/anti_semitism/9-11conspiracytheories.pdf
• If the 19 hijackers of 9/11 (15 of which were Saudi Wahabist) were indeed working for the Israeli Mosad as antisemitic conspiracy theorists claim, why are these 19 Zionist workers referred throughout the Muslim world as "The Magnificent 19"? http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34223
• Why did Osama bin Laden and his deputy Ayman al-Zawahiri admit joyfully to something that the Zionists had supposedly done? http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/binladen_10-29-04.html

3. Does every Palestinian suicide bomber that blows themselves up among Jewish civilians (public buses, bus stop locations, banquet halls, pizza parlors, ect.) and who likewise die in transgression (sura 9:84 3) also receive the Allah prepared hell for their suicide / murderous acts?
Follow up questions:

• If not, then why not? Aren't Palestinian terrorist acts upon innocent civilians (men, women, children, senior citizens, and infants) just as evil as the 9/11 hijacker's acts of evil? Does the victims being Israeli Jews somehow cause a change of the eternal outcome for the villain-terrorists - from the 9/11 hijackers burning in hell to the Palestinian suicide bus bombers receiving paradise and 72 virgins, in your moderate Islamic view?
• If Palestinian suicide bombers go to hell as the 9/11 hijackers did, then what should be done (or what would you be willing to do as a moderate Muslim) in the Muslim world to discredit official Palestinian television (PA as well as Hamas television) that glorifies these "evil doers" as entering the gardens of paradise and receiving virgins in that paradise in return for their transgression of religious murder?

4. Has there ever been any Jewish temples in what is today's Jerusalem? > http://www.adl.org/Anti_semitism/arab/temple_denial.asp If not, out of all the holy places in Arabia (such as #1 Mecca and #2 Medina) why was the city of Jerusalem that had no Muslim structures (such as a Mosque) nor any Muslims living in or around the city at the time of Muhammad, be the special placed picked for Muhammad to travel to (via ru' ya -vision) during his "Night Journey"?

Follow up questions:

• Why was the Qiblah (direction of prayer) originally instructed by Muhammad to be towards "Jerusalem" of all places even before the "Night Journey" in 620 CE, in which it wasn't changed to be towards Mecca until three years after the Night Journey in 623 CE?
• Why does the Night Journey tale fall under a sura titled "Bani Isra'il" (Children of Israel) in which the story of the Night Journey begins in verse 1 and is followed by the subject of the "Children of Israel" in verse 2 4 and the suject of the "Jewish temples" in verses 4-7 5? Do you see any connection between a Jewish temple and Jerusalem within this sura whatsoever here?
• Given the fact that both the Hebrew Scriptures and the New Testament (which are centuries older than the advent of Islam) states that the Jewish temples were indeed in Jerusalem (II Chronicles 3:1 / St. Mark 11:15), and given the archaeological finds such as the Trumpeting Stone and the Temple - Gentile Warning Plaques> http://www.bible-history.com/jewishtemple/JEWISH_TEMPLEArchaeology.htm, the inscription near the Jaffa Gate made by the Tenth Roman Legion of whom Josephus refers to as the ones who destroyed the temple in 70 CE, and the depiction on the Arch of Titus in Rome > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arch_of_Titus, is it possible that the Palestinian Muslim Temple deniers like the moderate Mahmoud Abbas, Nabil Sha'ath, Sa'eb Erakat, and the rest of the Muslim world who remain silent on such denials, are indeed seeking to establish Jerusalem as a Palestinian capital based upon a immense Jewish - denial underlined historical lie?

5. Was there a Holocaust during the Nazi reign that murdered "six million Jews" or was there a conspiracy on the part of the Zionists to fabricate a Holocaust in order to obtain a Jewish state on stolen Palestinian land? > http://www.pmw.org.il/holocaust.htm#1
Follow up questions:

• Do you find it strange as a moderate Muslim that most all of the Holocaust deniers are also Temple deniers as well? Why do you think that is?
• What do you think the moderate Mahmoud Abbas has to gain by denying both the Holocaust and the Jewish Temple being in Jerusalem?
• Since the terrorist-minded Yassir Arafat was also a Holocaust / Jewish temple denier, do you think that it is becoming of Mahmoud Abbas to follow suit as a moderate? If not, then why not?

6. Was the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Muhammed Amin al-Husseini that met with Adolph Hitler in November 1941 a good and righteous Muslim or a bad and evil Muslim? http://www.palestinefacts.org/pf_mandate_grand_mufti.php
Follow up questions:

• How would you defend Husseini's announcement over a Berlin Nazi radio in March 1944, "Kill the Jews wherever you find them" (by which he was quoting a holy hadith) and that, "This pleases God, history, and religion” ?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Amin_al-Husayni
  
• Was Hussenini in making such pro-Jew killing statements just trying to keep the Jews from steeling Muslim land in Palestine?
• Was Yasser Arafat wrong in applying Husseini to the Palestinian people as "our hero"?
  http://www.pmw.org.il/bulletins-050802.html
• By judging his works on earth, would you say as a Muslim moderate that the "Mufti" Husseini went to be with Allah in the Gardens of Paradise, or to a burning hell where disbelievers in Allah go?

7. According to the Koran, Mohammad is an excellent example of conduct for believers to emulate (sura 33:21 6). As that excellent example to Muslim believers, Mohammad dug trenches (like the Nazis did at Auschwitz) before personally taking part in the beheading all the Jewish men (including all young boys who had pubic hair growth) of the Jewish tribe Banu Qurayza that lived in Yathrib (now Medina). After having the beheaded bodies dropped in his pre-dug trenches, Mohammad then confiscated their land and valuable property items, and placed the surviving women and children of the tribe into harsh slavery. Therefore, what does this messenger of Allah and his "excellent example" act of merciless oppression and the killing of Jews mean to you as a moderate Muslim?
Follow up questions:

• How much does Mohammad's historical actions toward Jews living in the cities of Medina and Khaybar effect your views toward Jews in Israel and elsewhere today?
• Should Jews be allowed to live anywhere in Saudi Arabia and including Mecca? If not, then why not? Wouldn't allowing Jews to live in Mecca show the true Islamic moderation that you claim true Islam is?
  

8. Do you support the killing of Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh who was stabbed to death on November 02, 2004 for his film "Submission" >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submission_(film) that insulted Muslim women?
Follow up statement:
Please explain the difference of Mohammad, being an excellent example of conduct, ordering a Jewish poet named Ka'b bin Al-Ashraf to be beheaded for insulting Muslim women via poems, and the murder of Theo van Gogh for insulting Muslim women via film.

9. What should be done with the non-believers who insult Mohammad by depicting him in Dutch cartoons? Should they be beheaded as many Muslims in London suggested on February 3, 2006 by holding up such signs that read "Behead Those Who Insult Islam" (see picture above)? Since Islamic history records that the excellent exampler of conduct himself (Koran 33:21) had a one hundred-year old man named, Abu Afak and a pregnant women named Asma bint Marwan killed for simply insulting him, why shouldn't the Dutch cartoonist meet (in Allah's way shown by his excellent-exampal messenger) the very same fate?

10. Of the following two choices which had you rather have as a moderate Muslim:
A. America to stay the same under the current US Constitution that provides such things as "freedom of speech" and "freedom of religion" whereby Islamic sharia law can never had a superior preeminence" as commanded by the Koran 7.
B. America to fall under sharia Islamic law and become an Islamic state where Christians and Jews would be officially recognized as a lower dhimmi status, and where things like "freedom of speech" - such as the freedom to speak agianst Islam and Mohammad - and "freedom of religion" such as converting away from Islam, would not only be unlawful, but carry on sharia style death sentence with it?
Follow up question: Of the two choices above, what would Mohammad, being an excellent example of conduct for believers (Koran 33:21) pick for America if he were alive and given the same choice today?
Follow up questions:

• Should the White House become a great white mosque for the Nation of Islam?
• Should the US Capital building become another great mosque for the Nation of Islam?
• Should State capital buildings in every state become mosques for the Nation of Islam?
• Should the US Supreme Court building be a Sharia Law center where fatwas are issued?
  

11. If a Muslim does succeed in killing the now knighted Salman Rushdie according to the fatwa given by the late Ayatollah Khomeini for insulting Islam in his book "Satanic Verses" >

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salman_Rushdie will that Muslim be in "transgression of Allah's Koran" by doing so (in taking an innocent life) or was the fatwa itself evil in nature (against the Koran) coming from an Ayatollah -the highest Islamic authority in Shia Islam?

12. Does Islamic law forbid the killing of women and children during warfare?
Follow up question:
Would this forbidding of killing women and children exclude the 4000 Hezbollah rockets that was shot at random targeting non-military populations including men, women, children, and infants in the summer of 2006, and agian the additional 6,500 rockets that was shot into Israel by Hamas in 2008? If so, then how so? If not, why not?
Follow up question:

• Does the Islamic forbidding of killing women and children include hundreds of Qassam rockets being shot towards population area including elementary schools in Sderot Israel?
  

13. Would you be a happy moderate Muslim if Iranian president Ahmadinejad wiped Israel off the map with a nuclear bomb?
Follow up questions:

• Who should have won the Six Day War that was intended to annihilate Israel by "pushing Israel into the sea"?
• How is Ahmadinejad's "wipe Israel off the map" rhetoric not the "same in principle" to the rhetoric of the Islamic nation leaders had when they sought Israel's destruction in 1967?

14. Please explain with your best moderate interpretation the hadith "Sahih" (reliable collection) Muslim book 41 number 6985 that states: "The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him."

15. Why did the Mohammad, being an excellent example of conduct to believers (sura 33:21) command his Muslim believers not to take Jews and Christians as friends (sura 5:51)?
Follow up questions:

• Was such a commandment given because Mohammad received a revelation from Allah , that the Jews were the most violent of people towards the Muslim believers (sura 5:82)?
  
• Is there a sura-connection of the two verses concerning the forbidding of taking Jews as friends and the Jews being the most violent people towards believers coming out of the "same" sura (sura 5:51 / sura 5:82)?

16. Do you believe that the Jews are the most mischievous of all races of people in the entire earth, and that it's the Jews who are always starting the wars that Allah has to put out according to sura 5:64?
Follow up questions:

• Did the tiny Jewish army or the multiple Arab armies start of 1948-49 War of Independence, the 1956 Sinai Campaign, the 1967 Six Day War, 1973 Yom Kippur (or October War) 2006 Lebanon war?
  
• When Allah "put out" these Jewish-started wars above in accordance to sura 5:64, why has the Israeli Jews always been the Allah-denying victors?
  
• Why does Adolph Hitler agree with sura 5:64 in his manifesto Mein Kamph concerning the Jews being the most mischievous race of people? Did Hitler have some Allah-given insight?

17. Are the modern Israelis true Jews descendants of the biblical Abraham, Issac, of Jacob or Khazars from the Khazar Kingdom?
Follow up questions:

• Since the Khazar kingdom became today's Jews in an event that happened "after" sura 5:64 was written, did the Khazar race of people take the place of the Banu Qaynuqa, Banu Nadir and Banu Qurayza Jewish tribes that Mohammad knew, as the most mischievous people on the earth?
• Are the Palestinians the true biblical Jews that are biblically promised to inherent the land of Palestine as they claim? If so, who were "the Jews" Muhammad wrote about in the Koran that he considered himself not being related to, as the most violent people towards Muslim believers and always causing wars that Allah has to put out?
  

18. Do Jews use human blood from Muslim or Christian boys to make their Matzah bread for the Passover meal?
Follow up questions:

• Do you support the Syrian produced TV series "Al-Shatat" (The Diaspora) that depicts Jewish rabbis cutting a Christian boy's throat for Passover Matzah bread? http://www.pmw.org.il/
• Do you support the Iranian produced TV series titled, "Zahra's Blue Eyes" that depicts Jewish surgeons preparing to remove (steal) eyeballs from a small Palestinian girl for Jewish use? http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP83304
• Do you support the Egyptian produced TV series "Knight without a Horse" that depicts Jews (Zionists) taking over the world from ancient times that has caused national tragedies and governments to fall? http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/934.htm
• Are the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" true?
• Why do you think the ones who believe that the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" are true, also believe that Jews use human blood from Muslim or Christian boys for their Passover matzah bread? Is there a chance that these two beliefs go hand-in-hand from a spiritual standpoint, kind of like Temple-denying and Holocaust-denying go hand-in-hand as well?
• What does such beliefs that are so strong that is causes TV series productions to be made throughout the Islamic world and in some cases aired during Ramadan (Islam's holiest month) say concerning the Islamic world itself?
  

19. Is it inappropriate in your moderate world of Islam, for a middle-aged 49 year-old man to be engaged to a 6 year-old child, and for a 52 year-old man to have sexual relations with a 9 year-old child-bride?
Follow up questions:

• Did Mohammad have sexual relations with 9 year-old Aisha as an excellent example of human behavior that would allow his believers to follow (sura 33:21)?
• Why doesn't sharia law (like what is practiced in Iran today) see any wrong in a 52 year-old (or older) man having sexual relations with a 9 year-old girl?
• Do you think the child moslestors that appear on MSNBC Dateline's 'To Catch a Predator' with Chris Hansen>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_Catch_a_Predator most of whom are many years younger than was Mohammad, seeking children as much as six years older than Aisha was when Mohammad had sexual relations with her, should be prosecuted as sexual criminals?

20. Please explain in your moderate way the difference between Dar Al-Islam (lands that are ruled by Islam, literally "House of Submission") and Dar Al-Harb (lands not controlled by Islam, literally "House of War") and where you read in the Koran that you are relieved from "your duty" as a Muslim (barring illness and physical inability) to fight the infidels "where ever you find them" in accordance with sura 8:39, sura 9:5, and sura 9:29, and as one who "believes" should fight in the way of Allah against the friends of the devil who disbelieve, all in accordance with sura 4:74-76?
Follow up statement:
If you believe as a moderate Muslim in the so-called greater jihad (jihad al-akbar) with the total abandonment of the so-called lesser jihad (jihad al-asyhar) in your life, please explain why you think Mohammad being the excellent example of human behavior according to sura 33:21, used the "lesser jihad" so abundantly throughout his life in his conquest of the entire Arabian Peninsula.
.
Bonus Question for the Shiite "moderate" Muslim:
When the Twelfth (Hidden) Imam, Muhammad al-Mahdi appears, will he be a proponent of "moderate Islam" that might include Western values such as, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom expression, freedom of the press, or will he set things to be under strict sharia Islamic law world-wide?
Follow up questions:

• Will the al-Mahdi be considered a "moderate" Muslim and denounce Islamic extremism?
  
• If the al-Mahdi will be a proponent of sharia law when he appears, shouldn't all Muslims including so-called moderate Muslims be striving for sharia law now?
• Will the al-Mahdi be pleased with you for not promoting sharia law to your government and in your life?
• How would the al-Mahdi when he appears answer all the questions above?

Notes:
1. "And whoever believes not in Allah and his messenger - then surely we have prepared burning fire for the disbelievers." - Koran 48:13 (Maulana Muhammad Ali translation).
2. "Those who disbelieve from among the 'People of the Book' and the idolaters will be in fire of hell, abiding therein. They are the worst of creatures." - Koran 98: 6 (Maulana Muhammad Ali translation).
3. "Surely they disbelieve in Allah and his messenger and they died in transgression." -Koran 9:84 (Maulana Muhammad Ali translation).
4. "Glory to him who carried his servant by night from the Sacred Mosque to the Remote Mosque...And we gave Moses the Book and made it a guidance to the Children of Israel" - Koran 17:1-2 (Maulana Muhammad Ali translation).
"...his (Muhammad's) being carried to the Temple at Jerusalem signified that he would also inherit the blessing the blessings of the Israelite prophets." - Ali's footnote on Koran 17:1
5. "And we made known to the Children of Israel in the Book: Certainly you will make mischief in the land twice...We raised another people that they might bring you to grief and that they might enter the Mosque as they entered it the forst time, and that they might destroy, whatever they conquered, with utter destruction."- Koran 17:4,7 (Maulana Muhammad Ali translation).
"Jeresalem was destroyed twice as a punishment for the transgression of the Jews, once by Bablylon, and again by the Romans" - Ali's footnote on Koran 17: 4
"This verse describes the destruction of the Temple a second time." - Ali footnote on Koran 17:7
6. "Certainly you have in the messenger of Allah an excellent examplar for him who hopes in Allah and the Latter Day, and remembers Allah much." - Koran 33:21 (Maulana Muhammad Ali translation).
"This verse points to a most significant truth and a distinguishing characteristic of the holy prophet viz., that he is the best exemplar and the highest model of virtue for the faithful under all circumstances.....a perfect model as he is here pronounced to be." - Ali's footnote on Koran 33:21
7. "And fight with them until there is no more fitnah (unbelief resistance) and all religions are for Allah" -Koran 8:39 (Maulana Muhammad Ali translation).