The Miracle of Zionism

"Israel is the only nation in the world that is governing itself in the same territory, under the same name, and with the same religion and same language as it did 3,000 years ago." - Historian Barbara Tuchman

"Israel is the only nation on the face of the earth that was created by a sovereign act of God" - Pastor John Hagee

"All things are mortal but the Jew; all other forces pass, but he remains. What is the secret of his immortality?" - Author / Atheist, Mark Twain (long before the Holocaust and Israeli-Jewish statehood)

"They are the most glorious nation that ever inhabited this Earth. The Romans and their Empire were but a Bauble in comparison of the Jews. They have given religion to three quarters of the Globe and have influenced the affairs of Mankind more, and more happily, than any other Nation ancient or modern." - President John Adams - His 1808 response letter criticizing the depiction of Jews by the French Enlightenment philosopher Voltaire.

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Antisemitism Among the Three Great Monotheistic Faiths

I believe its possible for a person to have genuine affection for the Jewish people and still produce antisemitic expressions and not realize it. I know that sounds strange and maybe even impossible, but one has to view the core root of antisemitism to get an idea of what I’m talking about. Antisemitism goes much deeper than any racial or national issues. Its base is a spiritual one. Adolph Hitler’s hatred for the Jew was not a physical based ideology but rather a spiritual based ideology. Hitler himself is reported to having told his associate, Hermann Rauschning: “I know perfectly well that in the scientific sense there is no such thing as a race. As a politician I need a conception which enables the order which has hitherto existed on a historic basis to be abolished and an entirely new order enforced and given an intellectual basis. And for this purpose the conception of race serves me well.”
.
Race, Jewish blood, and National Socialism, was only avenues by which Hitler’s spiritual hatred could be expressed in the physical realm. When we understand the full spiritual concept of what a Jew is, and what the Jew represents, it is only then we can begin to see the full concept of what antisemitism actually is. Without using the Bible as a spiritual guide, antisemitism is just another form of racism.

Any form of expression that seeks to separate the Jew from the covenant by which the God of Israel has appointed them is in reality antisemitic! Therefore, any attempt to convert the Jew away from his covenant with God (regardless of the honesty and compassion one might have for the Jew while doing so) is still an act of antisemitism against the Jew and the God of Israel.
.
Think of what converting the Jew away form the covenant really is doing. It's converting them away from the very element that made them "Jews" to begin with! In a sense it is spiritually and physically "Gentilizing" them. More importantly, it not only dishonors the Jews themselves but the very covenant God made with them. Seeking Jewish conversion can be an willful or an inadvertently expression of denying God’s covenant with Israel. If Jewish conversion were able to run its full course the way missionaries envision it, the Jews as a people along with the covenant itself would be annihilated. My challenge to any Christian disagreeing with me on this, is to examine and ponder what the results would be if the entire Christian world were to abandoned their Christian heritage and be converted to Islam? The same results that would happen to the Christian world are the results that would happen to the Jewish world if they all converted to Christianity.
.
Islam seeks to destroy the Christian world by converting Christians to Islam and they are doing so at a rapid rate. Islam is the world’s fastest growing religion in the world. The Christian world is becoming well aware of Islam’s threat to Christianity. While the Christian leaders are disgusted with Islam’s goal towards Christianity they forget that the same conversion rule applies to the Christians who fervently seeks Jewish converts. Remember, the Muslims believe they are right in their religion just as much and even probably more so than most Christians believe they are right in their religion. It takes an awful strong faith in Allah to blow oneself into a million pieces in their devotion to him. It’s a strange thing that Islam goes all out to try and convert Christians and Jews, while Christians go all out to and try convert the Muslims and Jews, but the Jews being the tiny minority of the three great monotheistic faiths, don’t attempt to convert either one of them to Judaism. There is a spiritual reason behind this that I will get to.
.
The annihilation of the God of Israel, or the effect of making the God of Israel powerless, (basically making His word return to Him void (see Isaiah 55:11) is the ultimate goal of antisemitism. General God-haters and antisemites alike know that once they can find a way to annihilate the Jews in any form, (either by physical death, religious conversion, and assimilation) they will in effect have killed God (see Psalms 115: 2,3) because the God of Israel is known by His covenant that He has established with the Jews and the nation of Israel (see Jeremiah 31:36). So I would encourage the Gentile Christians of whom many really do have a compassion for Israel and the Jews, not to try and pull the Jews away for what God has already laid down as a requirement for them which is their Torah (see Deuteronomy 4:2). If nothing else, encourage them to be Torah minded and let God deal with Israel as He so chooses.
.
It was never the intention of the All-Mighty that His Jewish nation to become like the other nations (Deuteronomy 7:6 / 14:2). Christianity and Islam are Gentile faiths of those other nations (see Deuteronomy 6:14). Though they use the Jewish scriptures as the foundation to their faith, their faith is Gentile oriented and Gentile maintained. Paul's conversion to Christianity caused his name to be changed from a Hebrew name of Saul to a Greco-Roman name of Paul (Acts 13:9). The name "Paul" remains a popular name among Gentiles while the name "Saul" (Solomon / Shlomo) remains popular among the Jews. I love to ask Messianic (Jew-want-to-be) Christians why that is. Paul, being the main author of the New Testament, traveled all over the Gentile world taking his message to them (see Romans 15:16) while Islam rejects God's covenant with Israel via Isaac (see Psalms 105:9,10) in order to accept their Gentle version of the Abrahamic covenant through the Gentile Ishmael (see Sura 37: 101-113). Christianity spread to the Gentile West via Rome while Islam spread throughout the Gentile Middle East via Mecca. But between both of these two massive bodies of land lies a very small strip of land that connects and a particular people with a eternal covenant. As with the onslaught of conversion efforts, isn't it spiritually strange that the Jews historically have received great persecutions in the form of physical attacks from both of the Christian and Islam nations (about 54% combined) while at the same time seeking the total conversion of the tiny Jewish nation, but you never hear or read about the Jewish people attacking either of them on the basis of their religion nor seeking their conversion to their faith?
.
Here are some amazing facts:

  • The two great world faiths of Christianity and Islam that makes up more than half of the world’s population (54% combined) seeks the total conversion of the tiny Jewish nation (0.22% of the world’s population) to their religion and belief system. To really get a good mental picture of just how offset Judaism is in population compared to the top two major religions of the world (which just happen to be the only two rivals of Judaism) take a look at the graph at the top of this article and notice the big green and red areas representing Christianity and Islam world populations. Then compared those areas to the tiny (hard to see) thin blue line representing Jews in Judaism between the colored areas of Buddhism and the other minority religions.

  • Evangelicals spend approximately 250 million dollars every year on Jewish evangelism including missions to Israel for the sole purpose of converting the Jew, while the Jews spend about 250 millions dollars less then the evangelicals in Gentile proselytizing. How about that for one-sided spending figures? Muslims countries spend billions per year on weapons and political methods intended for the killing off the Jews who will not convert to Islam. Any Jew who converts to Islam can become worry free of any terrorist attacks, just as any Jew who converts to Christianity no longer has to put up with eager missionaries looking for that Jew-feather to put in their Christian hat.

  • It is possible for a Gentile to be righteous outside of Judaism, but in the eyes of both Christianity and Islam, a Jew cannot be righteous hanging onto Law of Moses while converting to Christianity or Islam. This fact has made Judaism the most tolerant of the three monotheistic religions towards those outside their faith. A good question to ponder: During the Crusades when the forces of Christian Europe were fighting the Islamic empire from which both sides included the killing of Jews, who during this time were the Jews striking up a war with?

  • Both Christianity and Islam have made their boasts throughout their history that they, and only they are the new chosen people and are the spiritual replacement of the physical seed of Israel while the nation of Israel bends over backwards to downplay their being chosen of God.
    “God's Only 'Chosen Person' is Jesus Christ, and those in Him” - The Preterist Archive -
    web-site / Dennis Todd
    “The people who are really chosen by God are the Muslims community which has gathered under God’s banner without regard to differences of races, nations, colors, and countries.”
    - Sayid Qutb, Milestones along the Road, p. 238
    According to the ancient Talmudic traditions, Israel was the very last (far from the first choice) that God picked to be His chosen people. According to the tradition, it was only because Israel accepted the covenant at Mt. Sinai after all the other nations refused it was how Israel came to become God’s chosen people.

  • Islam and Christianity which together makes up more than half of the world’s population have their foundations based on Judaism. Muslims will not recognized the New Testament as being from God, nor will the Christians recognize the Koran being from God, yet both Christianity and Islam recognize the Torah being from God. This fact is even more amazing when one considers the Jews were not liked and appreciated in both Christendom and Islamic worlds, yet their Torah was.

  • Christianity and Islam are both based only upon religious creeds while Judaism is based on faith and a nation of people. If a Christian stops believing in Jesus he is no longer a Christian. If a Muslim stops believing in Muhammad he is no longer a Muslim. A Jew however, can stop believing in the Torah but he will still remain a Jew - an apostate Jew.

  • Looking at the three great monotheistic religions from the outside, it is impossible for Judaism to be wrong in foundation while the other two monotheistic religions are right in their foundation. This is because without the Torah the New Testament and the Koran has no foundation thereby voiding any claim as the true religion. Therefore, is possible for Judaism to be right in its foundation and the other two be wrong because the Torah is not dependent on either the New Testament or the Koran in establishing its foundation as a true religion. Likewise, If you were to ask a Muslim that if he found out that Islam’s foundation was indeed proven to be false, what religion would he perceive as the next obvious choice as the correct religion? He would more than likely choose either Christianity or Judaism as the correct true religion. If you then were to ask a Christian the exact same question about Christianity, he would pick Judaism as the obvious correct religion. But if you would asked an observant Jew the same exact question regarding Judaism, there is no religion outside of Paganism that he could point to as the next best, obvious choice. There is a spiritual reason for this that goes beyond the time-line as to when each religion began. At the End of Days, when all things then becomes obvious, the world comes seeking the Jews for spiritual guidance.
    Thus saith the LORD of hosts; In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that God is with you. - Zechariah 8:23
To the evangelicals, conversion takes top priority over everything else concerning the Jews, even if it meant great hardships and even death for the Jews. The evangelicals would no doubt argue that it is through their Christian love that they labor to see the Nation of Israel converted to Christianity. However, this “top priority” and so-called Christian love actually undermines everything unique about the Jewish nation that sets Israel apart from the rest of the nations. It is the evangelicals’ goal to make the Jewish nation the same as all the other Christian nations on the earth through conversion. If the Christian world’s desire for the Jewish people’s conversion were made reality it would totally destroy the identity of the Nation of Israel as a people of Jews. I know there are going to be people who will not believe this statement because it paints their conversion desire for all Jews in a negative light, so I’ll pose these three questions along with the obvious answers:

  • Q. If all of Israel would have become Christianized in the first century would there be a modern Israel today?
    A. Christian teaching in all of the New Testament reserves no special physical place on earth for the Christian believer, not even the physical land of Israel. The teaching of Jewish Zionism is nowhere found in the New Testament, only the doctrines of “spiritual Jerusalem” and of the spiritual “Israel of God” are taught. If all the Jews converted to Christianity in the first century there would be no peoples of the earth to embrace the spiritual concept of living in the promised land God gave to the ancient Israelites, for there would be no spiritual significant reason to do so. See: Romans 2:28, Romans 9, Galatians 4:26, Galatians 6:15,16 , Revelations 21:2

  • Q. If all of Israel would have become Christianized in the first century would there be a people identifying themselves as descendants from Jacob (Israel) today?
    A. The New Testament teaches that true Jews are the ones who become Christians and that the physical seed of Jacob has been replaced by a spiritual seed of faith to the believer. Therefore, had all of Israel converted to Christianity in the first century there would be no peoples of the earth identified as the descendants of Jacob for there would be no spiritual significant reason to keep track or a remembrance of that physical seed. It is also note worthy that the apostle Paul (the main author of the New Testament) did not have any physical seed of his own and instructed others to follow him in a vow of abstinence if they were spiritually able to do so (I Corinthians 7:8). While this type of vow may not be harmful to a “spiritual seed” doctrine, it can only deplete the physical seed of Israel while directly avoiding the promise that the physical seed of Israel will as numerous as the stars heaven and as the sands of the sea. Therefore this type of revelation also undermines any promises concerning the land of Israel, being that this physical land, spiritually and eternally belongs to a very physical people.
    See St. John 4:20-23, Galatians 4:25,26, Acts 15:14-17 (the temple in Jerusalem)

  • Q. If all of Israel would have become Christianized in the first century, would the Law of Moses (by which Jews have remained Jews) be observed by any people on the earth today?
    A. The New Testament teaches that the Law of Moses has been fulfilled and is no longer valid to the Christian believer. Paul’s letter to the Galatians clearly confirms this many times over. Therefore, had all of Israel converted to Christianity in the first century there would be no people remaining on the earth today recognizing themselves to be under the Law of Moses. This would also cause there to be no religion in the earth that is totally based on the Law of Moses - which is exactly how Jews are known as Jews today! Therefore, had all of Israel converted to Christianity in the first century there would be no people on the earth whose spiritual foundation is the Law of Moses, because there would be no spiritual significant reason to keep the Law of Moses. This would result in there being no Torah-believing Jews (therefore no Jews) on the earth - only complete Christian assimilation.
    See Acts 10:13-16 (symbolic) Romans 3:20, Romans 7:4-6, Romans 10:4, Galatians 2:16,21, Galatians 3:13, Galatians 5:2-3,6.

It is an absolute fact that the total conversion of today’s Jewish people (which again, is the aim of every evangelical missionary Christian) would wipe out the Jewish nation from the earth. There would be no more physical seed (a.k.a. chosen people) identified as physical Jews on the face of the earth. I know this sounds mean but it’s the truth in principle, that today's evangelicals are no different (other than not being violent) than Hamas or any other terrorist group that seeks to destroy God’s covenant with the Jews of which the Law of Moses is connected! They just simply use different techniques and methods from those who use terrorism tactics, but which this wasn't always the case. Crusade Christianity and Inquisition Christianity were as every bit evil in terrorizing to Jews as today's Islamic terrorists. Hamas tries to murder the Jews away from their covenant while evangelicals try to covert the Jews away from their covenant. One of their biggest techniques is trying to convince the Jew that the Law of Moses is no longer in effect. There is an onslaught by both the Arabs and the Christians (the basic whole of the Gentile world) to takeover Jewish Israel. The Arabs want to make Israel an assimilated Muslim nation like all the other Muslim nations under the name of Palestine, while the Christians wish to make Israel an assimilated Christians nation like all the other Christian nations, and it’s sad that the secular Israeli government is at fault for allowing both fronts to continue as well as to grow.

I can understand a caring Christian’s true desire for a spiritual revival among the Jewish nation with the belief that only through the Jewish conversion to Christianity can a such a revival occur. However, Christians, and especially the evangelical missionaries, must realize that is wasn’t through the conversion to Christianity that the nation of Israel has been preserved and still survives to this day after three thousand years of persecutions. On the contrary, the fact remains that it was the Jewish people’s dedication to the Torah and the Talmud that has kept the Jewish nation intact as a people and as a nation throughout their tough history. It was not through the conversion to Christianity that brought about the modern phenomenon of the in-gathering of Jews back to Israel during this last century. If the Jews hadn’t been Torah minded during the past two thousand years, there never would have been a physical Jewish people for God to gather back into Israel in the first place. Therefore the great spiritual phenomenon of Jews living once again in their ancient biblical homeland is directly based both spiritually and physically to the Law of Moses and not to any forms of Christianity or Jewish conversion into it. The ingathering of Jews back into their homeland is based on God’s promise through Israelite prophets who just so happened to believe in keeping the Torah of Moses at the time.

If God was wanting all the Jews to become Christians instead of remaining as Jews, He wouldn’t have allowed the Holocaust to happen. Why would He, when in the eyes of the Christian world, the Jews of Germany were supposedly turning their hearts towards Jesus in massive numbers? It is important to understand as well as it speaks volumes, that the two greatest times of mass Jewish conversion to Christianity (as well as mass assimilation) was just before the destruction of the second temple in Israel and just before the Holocaust in Germany! Isn’t that strange? Christian missionaries should realize that God has a special and unique way of doing things when it comes to the Jewish people. He always deals with Israel as a nation, not by a conversion here and a conversion there. It would be in the best interest for the Jews if the evangelicals would stop trying to convert the Jews and interfere with what God has planned for them according to His word that He has specifically spelled out by the Hebrew prophets.
.
But this shall be the covenant that I will cut with the house of Israel: After those days, says the LORD, I will put My law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. And they shall no more teach each man his neighbor and each man his brother, saying, Know the LORD; for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest of them, says the LORD. For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sins no more. - Jeremiah 31:33,34

7,214 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   7201 – 7214 of 7214
Anonymous said...

dailywire.com has an article
"Pastor John Hagee Draws The Line: Christians, Jews Must Stand Together Against Antisemitism"
By Hank Berrien
Dec 12, 2025

blogs.timesofisrael.com has an article
by
Benjamin Adam Saidel
"Tucker Carlson’s Christmas Tale: Fake Persecution, Real Antisemitism"
Dec 13, 2025

Don't be a Sucker
Boycott Tucker
Tucker is a Fraud & Charlatan

Anonymous said...

A person typed online today
"The Good Western Antisemite (GWAS) doesn't hate Jews, he only hates Israel. In fact, he has Jewish friends and finds the Holocaust very unpleasant.
The GWAS greatly appreciates Zweig and Walter Benjamin and also Jon Stewart. The GWAS is very sensitive to 20th-century European culture, and although he has trouble pronouncing the word "Ashkenazi," he likes to talk about Ashkenazim a lot as long as they know their place, and laughs a lot at the neuroses of Woody Allen, his main touchstone for Jewish culture which he thinks defines the New York Jew very well. Better than Seinfeld who is a Syrian Jew and who always had something wrong with him... And Jerry Seinfeld has also taken political stances that the GWAS doesn't find very correct.
And God forbid the GWAS should not allow others to speak freely. Free speech is very important. But there are things that the GWAS finds annoying. Because, although the GWAS doesn't like what Hamas did on October 7th—and it must be admitted that they exaggerated—he also doesn't agree with the fact Israel must defend itself against it- even though he might acknowledge that nobody else is going to take responsibility for dismantling Hamas, that’s not his problem. He also feels uncomfortable with the fact that Hamas agrees with some of the ways he treats Israel. But he knows that criticizing Netanyahu isn't antisemitic. Indeed, criticizing all Israeli governments isn't antisemitic. Criticizing Israel isn’t antisemitic. How could a lover of Woody Allen be antisemitic?
The GWAS criticizes Israel not because he despises Jews, but because he finds it intolerable that Jews haven't learned from history.
As a matter of fact, the GWAS is smarter than those who believed Hamas attacked Israel in such a way. It attacked, it did, but it never decapitated 40 babies. And it's not antisemitic to point that out because it was an opinion piece he once read in Haaretz, an Israeli newspaper. In fact, to the GWAS, Haaretz seems like a reference newspaper. It's not that he reads everything; he doesn't understand it 100%, because it's sometimes in Hebrew. He only pays attention to the articles highlighted by journalists and influencers on their social media, which are quite critical of Israel. Because you can criticize Israel without being antisemitic. Especially if you like Woody Allen."

Anonymous said...

The comment continues
"Indeed, when the GWAS criticizes Israel, he does so not because he despises Jews, but because he finds it intolerable that Jews haven't learned from history. Because it's not as if the Jews invaded the Germans, or kidnapped hundreds, or tortured, raped, and murdered civilians, but what they're doing now is exactly the same, exactly like Auschwitz. And if it's not exactly the same, it's still close to it, because there are so many dead. And remember that, having liked Woody Allen, the GWAS knows what he's talking about.
Because the GWAS is a great defender of human rights. Of all human rights. Well, except if the person in question voted for Likud. Or if he's an IDF reservist. Or if he lives in Tel Aviv and didn't condemn the settlements strongly enough. Or if...
And what's crucial to understand is that the GWAS isn't an antisemite but a moral pedagogue. He doesn't hate Jews; he's disappointed in them. He observes them like one observes a wayward son. And that's why he lectures them in opinion pieces and Twitter threads with more quotes than syntax.
The GWAS community, of course, condemns the October 7th attacks. Of course. It condemns all attacks. But sometimes it understands the context. Hamas, for example, seems like a reaction, not an action. They have no real agency in their decisions or their fate. And it's not even worth mentioning that, despite being an offshoot of a movement born in the 1920s, it must be Netanyahu's invention. He's not sure whether they raped or didn't rape, whether they beheaded or not, but he's certain the response to it isn't right. He doesn't know how he would respond; he leaves that to others, but he certainly would never respond the way Israel responds. A Western democracy defending itself with bombs isn't okay. Unless it's the other democracies. France, the United Kingdom, the United States, or Ukraine. But not Israel.
The GWAS doesn’t want to speak ill of the oppressed. Only of those who defend themselves. Even if those who defend themselves are those who started the war and want to exterminate all Jews.
No, the GWAS people aren't antisemites. They're better than that. They're conscious. Decolonized. Intersectional. Informed. In fact, they feel called by Providence to redeem Jews from their moral decadence. And that's why they compare them to Nazis. Not out of hatred. Out of didacticism. So they'll learn. Because if Jews don't learn from their history, who will? Certainly not them, the heirs of colonial societies who need an other on which to project their self-disgust."

Anonymous said...

& continues
"The GWAS doesn't believe in borders, except those demanded of Israel. They don't believe in armies, unless they're fighting against Israel. They don’t believe in conspiracy theories, unless they are about Israel. They believe in indigenous rights, unless they are Jews (who can never be indigenous) and rejects Blood and Soil unless they are Arabs (who are always indigenous). They are for decolonialization except if it is Jewish, and reject colonialism except if it is Arab. They don't believe in nationalism, except for the Palestinian nationalism, which is pure and eternal and must be very ancient and has no flaws. And if it does, they shouldn’t be addressed publicly. Because the GWAS doesn't want to speak ill of the oppressed. Only of those who defend themselves. Even if those who defend themselves are the ones who started the war and want to exterminate the Jews.
That's true: the GWAS allows themselves criticism. Always. On Twitter, in discussion groups, in reading group meetings. They criticize Israel vehemently, but with tenderness. With that tone one uses when someone doesn't live up to their civilization. Because they expected more from the Jews. They expected them to be victims forever. And it bothers them that they've become actors in history.
The only problem with the Good Western Antisemite is that there is a Bad Western Antisemite. That is, the one who says exactly the same thing, but without having watched Woody Allen."
Some people typed in reply
"The people who need to read this the most will be the people who react most defensively. They will scoff or write it off with a dismissive insult, or a sense of injury so personal that it will be reflected back at the person who shared it with full transference and reversal of transgressor status.

I wish I could envision the right people reacting to this with “whoops, I kinda fucked up” but the last two years of social media has rather brutally taught me that when it comes to this particular issue, such reflection is as rare and endangered as the white rhino"
"they'd probably focus on referencing Woody Allen, because no serious person under the age of 50, or maybe 60, cites Woody Allen as a touchstone for anything, and use their dislike of him to ignore every other spot on point."
"The people massacred on Oct 7th were mostly progressives who'd spent their entire lives trying to close the gap between Jew and Arab. Didn't matter to the murderers. Not one bit."
"The GWAS does not lend any credence to the testimonies of Mizrahim. The Jews of Iran, Morocco, and Egypt aren’t “real” representatives of the region…or better yet, maybe they’re not “real Jews.” (Woody Allen, of course, is a real Jew.) In fact, they are merely Arabs. Yes, that’s what they are. What they say about their lived experience doesn’t count. Their rejection of Arab identity is self-defeating orientalism. The GWAS knows this because he has read Edward Said. And no one knows more about the topic than Edward Said; except, of course, for the GWAS, who knows Mizrahim, and all Jews, better than they know themselves."
"the Mizrahi vote is what elected Netanyahu. A bit of 'context' for all the virtue-signaling intersectionalists."

Anonymous said...

Another person typed in reply
"They are also so tenderhearted they won't let their children play with toy guns. Well, except maybe if the children are playing Freedom Fighters vs Zios."

While a Non-Jewish Supporter of Israel
Typed online today
"You don't have to be Jewish to be grateful that Israel exists. You just have to appreciate democracy, human rights, and the right of people to live on their ancestors' native land."
Some people typed in reply
"And… who are
trying to live in peace with all and offer equal rights to people of every religion, race, creed, gender, orientation, etc."
"Exactly. Not seeing too many pro-Hamas supporters giving up their land/homes and donating it to the various Indigenous territories in Canada or the US upon which they are built. What's good for the goose is good for the gander, right? Hypocrites."

Anonymous said...

Another person typed online today
"Meet Hassan Shabat, the most recently unalived “JOURNALIST” in Gaza. If you were a journalist & a terrorist, you were a terrorist.

It’s no wonder Antizionists refuse to stop obsessively targeting, abusing & scapegoating Zionists over this propaganda they got lost in. The alternative would be to look at who an Antizionist is, & what an Antizionist represents….

I’d avoid those truths like the plague of historically genocidal racist Jew hate they were if I had your sick & evil lost soul too!"
A Photo is shown of the
"Journalist" a person typed in reply
"I can see the bloodthirsty psychotic look in his eyes."

Another person typed online today
"Memo to the 200 celebrities who called for the release of Marwan Barghouti: Barghouti is a convicted murderer serving 5 consecutive life sentences for slaughtering civilians. He is not a peacemaker and has no plans for dialogue - that is precisely why he is popular with the highly radicalized Palestinian society. Any celebrity advocating for his release is a celebrity for murderers."

Another person typed online today
"Nothing about the post-October 7th student Antisemitism movement is rational. It's a frenzy. A foaming at the mouth frenzy. But it didn't happen by accident. It has been engineered for decades by the Muslim Brotherhood and Qatar."— ISGAP - Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy, Dr. Charles Asher Small "

Anonymous said...

A person typed online today about Tucker Carlson
"š—§š—Øš—–š—žš—˜š—„ š—–š—”š—„š—Ÿš—¦š—¢š—” š—–š—Ÿš—”š—œš— š—¦ š—–š—›š—„š—œš—¦š—§š—œš—”š—”š—¦ š—›š—”š—©š—˜ š—œš—§ š—•š—˜š—§š—§š—˜š—„ š—œš—” š—¤š—”š—§š—”š—„ š—§š—›š—”š—” š—œš—¦š—„š—”š—˜š—Ÿ — š—›š—˜š—„š—˜’š—¦ š—Ŗš—›š—”š—§ š—›š—˜ š—Ÿš—˜š—™š—§ š—¢š—Øš—§
⁠⁣⁠⁣⁠⁣
Let’s get the š—³š—®š—°š˜š˜€ straight.
⁠⁣⁠⁣⁠⁣
Yes — Qatar has ~šŸ°šŸ¬šŸ¬š—ž Christians.
Israel has ~šŸ­šŸ“šŸ“š—ž.
⁠⁣⁠⁣⁠⁣
But here’s the part Tucker didn’t bother to explain:
⁠⁣⁠⁣⁠⁣
š—”š—¹š—ŗš—¼š˜€š˜ š—®š—¹š—¹ š—¼š—³ š—¤š—®š˜š—®š—æ’š˜€ š—–š—µš—æš—¶š˜€š˜š—¶š—®š—»š˜€ š—®š—æš—² š—ŗš—¶š—“š—æš—®š—»š˜ š˜„š—¼š—æš—øš—²š—æš˜€.
They are not citizens.
They do not vote.
They do not serve in government.
⁠⁣⁠⁣⁠⁣
Despite claims about š˜šš˜° š˜®š˜¢š˜Æš˜ŗ š˜Šš˜©š˜³š˜Ŗš˜“š˜µš˜Ŗš˜¢š˜Æ š˜¤š˜©š˜¶š˜³š˜¤š˜©š˜¦š˜“ š˜Ŗš˜Æ š˜˜š˜¢š˜µš˜¢š˜³, there are š—¦š—œš—«.
Total.
For šŸ°šŸ¬šŸ¬š—ž people.
⁠⁣⁠⁣⁠⁣
Israel?
š—›š˜‚š—»š—±š—æš—²š—±š˜€ š—¼š—³ š—°š—µš˜‚š—æš—°š—µš—²š˜€.
There are šŸ­šŸ³ Baptist churches alone — more than the entire number of churches in Qatar.
⁠⁣⁠⁣⁠⁣
Now the part that really matters:
⁠⁣⁠⁣⁠⁣
š—œš˜€š—æš—®š—²š—¹’š˜€ š—–š—µš—æš—¶š˜€š˜š—¶š—®š—»š˜€ š—®š—æš—² š—°š—¶š˜š—¶š˜‡š—²š—»š˜€.
They vote.
They serve in the IDF.
They hold elected office in the š—žš—»š—²š˜€š˜€š—²š˜.
⁠⁣⁠⁣⁠⁣
Qatar?
⁠⁣⁠⁣⁠⁣
š—¢š—³š—³š—¶š—°š—¶š—®š—¹š—¹š˜† š—­š—˜š—„š—¢ š—–š—µš—æš—¶š˜€š˜š—¶š—®š—» š—°š—¶š˜š—¶š˜‡š—²š—»š˜€.
Why?
Because š—¶š˜ š—¶š˜€ š—¶š—¹š—¹š—²š—“š—®š—¹ š˜š—¼ š—°š—¼š—»š˜ƒš—²š—æš˜ š—³š—æš—¼š—ŗ š—œš˜€š—¹š—®š—ŗ.
⁠⁣⁠⁣⁠⁣
That’s why every church in Qatar is:
⁠⁣⁠⁣⁠⁣
• Forced into one designated zone
• Monitored by the state
• ID checks required just to attend
⁠⁣⁠⁣⁠⁣
That’s not religious freedom.
That’s š—°š—¼š—»š˜š—®š—¶š—»š—ŗš—²š—»š˜.
⁠⁣⁠⁣⁠⁣
And we’re not even touching the š—®š—Æš˜‚š˜€š—¶š˜ƒš—² š—¹š—®š—Æš—¼š—æ š˜€š˜†š˜€š˜š—²š—ŗ many have compared to modern-day slavery — which is where most of those Christians actually live.
⁠⁣⁠⁣⁠⁣
So let’s recap what Tucker did:
⁠⁣⁠⁣⁠⁣
He cherry-picked:
• Raw headcount
• Permission to attend church
⁠⁣⁠⁣⁠⁣
And š—¶š—“š—»š—¼š—æš—²š—±:
• Citizenship
• Voting rights
• Legal equality
• Church access
• Conversion laws
• State surveillance
• Worker exploitation
⁠⁣⁠⁣⁠⁣
That’s not analysis.
That’s š—¼š—Æš˜ƒš—¶š—¼š˜‚š˜€ š˜€š—µš—¶š—¹š—¹š—¶š—»š—“.
⁠⁣⁠⁣⁠⁣
Even most paid propagandists would hesitate.
⁠⁣⁠⁣⁠⁣
But not Tucker.
⁠⁣⁠⁣⁠⁣
Why? "

Anonymous said...

A person typed online
December 11, 2025
"Eurovision: A Tale of Courage vs Cowardice

Seven months ago, Yuval Raphael stood alone on the St. Jakobshalle stage in Basel, Switzerland and sang her heart out with a level of courage rarely seen. This was no ordinary performance. She was representing Israel in a hostile environment, protected around the clock from those who openly wanted to harm her. The danger was not theoretical. During the grand final, two activists attempted to storm the stage and throw red paint on her.

But Yuval sang on, powered by her people and by an uncanny bravery forged in the ashes of October 7. She had survived the massacre by hiding for eight hours in a bomb shelter, surrounded by bodies and terrorists just metres away. The slightest sound could have meant her death.

To live through that horror and then step onto a world stage is remarkable.

But last week, at a meeting in Switzerland of the European Broadcasting Union (EBU)—the body that oversees Eurovision — we witnessed the opposite of that courage: cowardice.

The broadcasters of Spain, Ireland, the Netherlands, and Slovenia led a desperate campaign to ban Israel from the 2026 contest. When they failed, they did what cowards do when they don’t get their way: they threw a hissy fit and boycotted the competition instead. Iceland later joined them too. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro SĆ”nchez reacted by saying that if Russia was exiled from the competition, then so should Israel too. Irish Prime Minister MicheĆ”l Martin described the decision as an “act of solidarity.”

This sudden act of ‘principle’ means they will not participate next year — a great loss for anyone hoping to see yet another sub-par, devil-worshipping Irish performance — the kind that traumatises children for years.

No doubt, they’ll claim their boycott is grounded in moral principles. After all, their governments have taken politically hostile actions including varying degrees of boycotts or embargoes against Israel, spearheaded by what they call “principles”. This included “recognising” a non-existent Palestinian state — a symbolic gesture that has done nothing to advance peace, only push it further away by reinforcing the idea that a state can be achieved not through negotiation, but through rejection and violence.

But these arguments on principle are as farcical as Ireland’s 2008 Eurovision performance when they sent Dustin the Turkey, a puppet, as their entry.

Even as governments and broadcasters lead boycotting campaigns, reality tells a different story.

The Netherlands deploys Israeli Mobileye systems in its transport fleets, uses Netafim drip-irrigation, and relies on Given Imaging’s PillCam in its hospitals. Spain uses Israeli cybersecurity protocols in its police and security branches, and Spanish banks depend on Israeli identity-protection systems like CyberArk.

Ireland, one of Israel’s loudest critics, runs major parts of its telecom infrastructure using Amdocs — an Israeli company.
Slovenia, though small, still benefits from Israeli med-tech, irrigation systems, fleet-safety tools, and cybersecurity."

Anonymous said...

The comment continues
"And when these same governments need advanced weapons systems or cyber-defence capabilities, as many have used before, rest assured their grand boycott will dissolve faster than a Eurovision costume change. They know, as the rest of Europe does, that in many fields Israel is a world leader in advanced technologies and defence systems.

There also exists an irony that while many leaders posture about Israel, oftentimes their own populations think differently. In the 2025 Eurovision contest, some of Israel’s highest public-vote scores came from these same countries — in stark contrast to their juries.

In many ways, Israel won a moral victory — something intolerable to the boycotting nations. So they protested. And while they failed to get Israel removed, the EBU introduced new rules widely interpreted as targeting Israeli influence - a gesture chillingly reminiscent of darker times in Europe’s treatment of Jews.

Meanwhile, these “principle-driven” governments and broadcasters remain quiet about real genocides occurring in the world — such as the horrors unfolding in Sudan, or as Hamas cold-bloodedly executes its opponents in public squares in Gaza.

This is why Eurovision has long ceased to be a song competition. It has become a virtue-signalling pageant where political grandstanding often counts for more than musical merit.

It is this moral blindness that leads over 200 cultural figures to sign a petition demanding the release of Marwan Barghouti — a convicted murderer — in the delusional belief that freeing a terrorist brings peace.

Yuval Raphael’s performance this year was a testament to strength, integrity, and courage. She represented the best of us.

Spain, Ireland, Slovenia, and the Netherlands’ performance at Eurovision 2026 — which they will boycott — is a display of cowardice, shame, and dishonour. A symbol of the worst in them.

It is, as Shakespeare wrote, a tale “full of sound and fury,” but ultimately, “signifying nothing.”
Some people typed in reply
"Slovenia, Iceland and Spain didn’t qualify to participate anyway, they came last together with San Marino, so that gesture is an empty one."
"Those countries are talentless. Boycotting is an excuse so they don’t have to compete with Israel who outshines them by lightyears. Running away with their tails between their legs. Transparent no talents."
"We should boycott these countries and stop providing them with Israeli services, technology, medicines, the lot. Let’s she how they manage"

Anonymous said...

About the Terrible Horrific Terrorist Attack on Innocent Jews on
Bondi Beach in Sydney, Australia
In which 12 innocent people were murdered on December 14, 2025
A person typed online today
"Today has been a devastating day for the Australian Jewish community. Our people were targeted at a Chanukah event in Bondi, and at this stage, as I write this, there are reports that more than 10 people so far have been murdered, with expectations of more to come.

What words of comfort can we offer? What words of solace can we say?

There aren't any. There is only solidarity. Solidarity with my fellow Jews in Sydney, in Australia, in Israel and in the world.

Because this wasn't just an attack on Australian Jews. This was an attack on all Jews around the world. It was an attack on me, my family, my friends and my people.

Even as I write these words, I won't lie that my eyes are filled with tears right now. Because while the details are still coming in, there are reports of many elderly people who were targeted because they weren't able to run away. They just weren't quick enough.

Can you imagine that? The horror? The fear? Not being able to run away because your body won't let you.

I don't really have enough words or I don't know if I even have the right words, because the truth is that there are so many things that are running through my mind right now that I can't even make sense of it all.

But I will say this... this attack is absolutely personal. I know people who knew the victims, the injured, the murdered. My own parents were there, but had left a short time before the attack happened.

But while I try sort out what to say, I know one thing for sure.

Tonight I will light the first light of Chanukah and I will look at that flame and I will remember all my people and what we have endured through thousands of years. And I will light that candle with pride and with love and with a determination.

A determination that no one on this earth will ever stop me being a proud Jew."
Some people typed in reply
"Let Jewish people live their lives.
Jewish people should be safe. This should not be happening in 2025. Absolutely devastating 😢 my thoughts are with the people that have passed away šŸ’”"
"We lay under the donut stand praying for our lives!
Too horrific for words. The firing carried on for what felt like 20 mins. My heart & prayers with the families who suffered loss & injured.
Am Israel Chai.
My candles are shining extra bright tonight. šŸ•Ž"
"It's very risky to go out and celebrate publicly because that's the moment terrorists take advantage of. It's heartbreaking and infuriating."

Anonymous said...

About Tucker Carlson

blogs.timesofisrael.com has an article
by
Martin Sherman
"Into the Fray: Strange Bedfellows in Hate: From Carlson to the Caucasus"
Dec 12, 2025

Many people have said
Tucker Carlson & Candace Owens are also Very Toxic people because of their
Political Influence
They Spread Hate and Lies
Boycott them Both !!!!
A website also typed online today
"JEXIT condemns , in the strongest possible terms, the terrorist attack targeting the Jewish community in Australia. This was not an isolated incident, nor was it random—it was an act of antisemitic terror aimed at Jews simply for being Jewish.

Let us be absolutely clear:
An attack on Jews anywhere is an attack on Jews everywhere.

The Jewish people have a right to live openly, safely, and without fear—in Australia, in America, in Israel, and across the world. Violence against Jewish communities, institutions, or individuals is terrorism, and it must be named as such without hesitation or euphemism.

We call on Australian leaders, global governments, and civil society to act decisively—not just with statements of concern, but with real consequences for those who incite, enable, or carry out antisemitic violence. Silence and moral ambiguity only embolden hate.

JEXIT stands in unwavering solidarity with the Jewish community of Australia. You are not alone. We stand with you today, and we will continue to stand with you until Jewish safety, dignity, and truth are fully defended.

Am Yisrael Chai."

Anonymous said...

Another person typed online today :
"Australia has failed its Jews time and time again. This latest horror did not appear out of nowhere. It came after two years in which antisemitism surged to levels Jewish Australians have never seen, and too many institutions responded with hesitation, euphemisms, and excuses."
- Zvika Klein, The Jerusalem Post

Starting with the prime minister himself, but it's not just in Australia. The whole Western world, that's supposed to stand for liberal values, has failed the Jews and continues to fail the Jews."

Another person typed about the
Terrible Horrific Terrorist Attack in
Sydney, Australia
"Beyond devastated ..
They allowed the haters to chant at their famous opera house and then they allowed them to march on their famous bridge, it was only a matter of time before they let them murder Jews at their famous beach."

Anonymous said...

Another person typed online today
"Today’s attack in Sydney only reaffirms the ongoing reality of antizionism as an essentially violent ideology—one that drives out Jewish communities wherever it takes hold, through exclusion, discrimination, and even murder.

This is not about a political opinion that “crosses the line” into antisemitic violence. We are dealing with antizionist violence itself: the targeting of Jews as "Zionists," legitimized by specific antizionist libels.

This pattern is not new.

In Iraq in 1948, Shafiq Ades—a wealthy Jewish businessman who posed no threat to the state—was executed as a “Zionist traitor.” The label alone was enough to mark him for death. Two decades later, in 1969, nine Jews were hanged in Baghdad’s central square, accused of “Zionist” crimes as crowds gathered to celebrate their execution.

Across North Africa, similar patterns unfolded. In Tripoli in 1945, more than 140 Jews were murdered in a three-day pogrom sparked by rumors that local Jews supported "Zionist" aims in Palestine. In Oujda and Jerada (Morocco) in 1948, riots on the eve of Israeli independence killed dozens and triggered a mass exodus. In each case, accusations of “Zionist disloyalty” were enough to unleash violence against entire Jewish communities.

In Mandatory Palestine, the Mufti of Jerusalem incited mass violence by spreading libels that Jews were plotting to seize the Al-Aqsa Mosque—libels that helped ignite the major anti-Jewish massacres of 1920, 1921, 1929, and 1936, and that would later form part of the theological basis of Hamas’s genocide of October 7.

Under the Soviet antizionist campaign, the basic ideological architecture of antizionism was crystallized. The USSR canonized the core libels—“Zionism is racism” and “Zionism is Nazism”—and fixed Israel as the symbolic enemy of humanity. These same slurs now circulate every day, used to harass Jews online, mark them as enemies, and legitimate their social shunning and professional discrimination. The racialized figure of the "Zionist” forged in Soviet propaganda is the same target animating antizionist movements in the West today.

Since October 7, antizionism has entered the mainstream—but it is increasingly misrecognized in two ways: either collapsed into classical antisemitism, or legitimized as a neutral “political opinion.” In this environment, the genocide libel—a false, defamatory, and endlessly-repeated claim—functions as the primary mechanism for targeting “Zionists”—casting Israel as the embodiment of absolute evil, and anyone associated with it as a legitimate target.

Until we confront antizionism itself—as a distinct ideological formation with its own pattern of violence, its own trail of harm, and its own constitutive libels—we will remain unable to protect Jewish communities in the West.

What is at stake is not a “conflation” between Jews and Zionists, but the power of anti-Israel hatred itself, which produces the category of “the Zionist” and uses it to justify discrimination, exclusion, and violence wherever antizionism takes hold."

Anonymous said...

Another person typed online today
"THE TERRORIST ATTACK ON CHABAD’S HANUKAH EVENT AT BONDI BEACH, SYDNEY AUSTRALIA, IS NOT WITHOUT ITS CAUSES.

I consider the Prime Minister of Australia, Anthony Albanese, at least partially responsible for taking positions that pandered to the antisemites and Muslim extremists.

And now, people are dead, many critically injured.

Clearly an anti-Jewish attack

By Arab-Muslims, one named Naveed Akhram.

Who also placed several IED. (Explosive bombs that fortunately did not explode before being found)

Why terrorism in peaceful Australia that banned guns and made use of guns severely punished?

Easy answer. A Government, under Anthony Albanese, which put emphasis on getting Muslim votes, and that rushed to condemn Israel for defending itself and recognized a fictional Palestine State, and failed to respond to the warnings of its own security people."

«Oldest ‹Older   7201 – 7214 of 7214   Newer› Newest»