.
Race, Jewish blood, and National Socialism, was only avenues by which Hitler’s spiritual hatred could be expressed in the physical realm. When we understand the full spiritual concept of what a Jew is, and what the Jew represents, it is only then we can begin to see the full concept of what antisemitism actually is. Without using the Bible as a spiritual guide, antisemitism is just another form of racism.
Any form of expression that seeks to separate the Jew from the covenant by which the God of Israel has appointed them is in reality antisemitic! Therefore, any attempt to convert the Jew away from his covenant with God (regardless of the honesty and compassion one might have for the Jew while doing so) is still an act of antisemitism against the Jew and the God of Israel.
.
Think of what converting the Jew away form the covenant really is doing. It's converting them away from the very element that made them "Jews" to begin with! In a sense it is spiritually and physically "Gentilizing" them. More importantly, it not only dishonors the Jews themselves but the very covenant God made with them. Seeking Jewish conversion can be an willful or an inadvertently expression of denying God’s covenant with Israel. If Jewish conversion were able to run its full course the way missionaries envision it, the Jews as a people along with the covenant itself would be annihilated. My challenge to any Christian disagreeing with me on this, is to examine and ponder what the results would be if the entire Christian world were to abandoned their Christian heritage and be converted to Islam? The same results that would happen to the Christian world are the results that would happen to the Jewish world if they all converted to Christianity.
.
Islam seeks to destroy the Christian world by converting Christians to Islam and they are doing so at a rapid rate. Islam is the world’s fastest growing religion in the world. The Christian world is becoming well aware of Islam’s threat to Christianity. While the Christian leaders are disgusted with Islam’s goal towards Christianity they forget that the same conversion rule applies to the Christians who fervently seeks Jewish converts. Remember, the Muslims believe they are right in their religion just as much and even probably more so than most Christians believe they are right in their religion. It takes an awful strong faith in Allah to blow oneself into a million pieces in their devotion to him. It’s a strange thing that Islam goes all out to try and convert Christians and Jews, while Christians go all out to and try convert the Muslims and Jews, but the Jews being the tiny minority of the three great monotheistic faiths, don’t attempt to convert either one of them to Judaism. There is a spiritual reason behind this that I will get to.
.
The annihilation of the God of Israel, or the effect of making the God of Israel powerless, (basically making His word return to Him void (see Isaiah 55:11) is the ultimate goal of antisemitism. General God-haters and antisemites alike know that once they can find a way to annihilate the Jews in any form, (either by physical death, religious conversion, and assimilation) they will in effect have killed God (see Psalms 115: 2,3) because the God of Israel is known by His covenant that He has established with the Jews and the nation of Israel (see Jeremiah 31:36). So I would encourage the Gentile Christians of whom many really do have a compassion for Israel and the Jews, not to try and pull the Jews away for what God has already laid down as a requirement for them which is their Torah (see Deuteronomy 4:2). If nothing else, encourage them to be Torah minded and let God deal with Israel as He so chooses.
.
It was never the intention of the All-Mighty that His Jewish nation to become like the other nations (Deuteronomy 7:6 / 14:2). Christianity and Islam are Gentile faiths of those other nations (see Deuteronomy 6:14). Though they use the Jewish scriptures as the foundation to their faith, their faith is Gentile oriented and Gentile maintained. Paul's conversion to Christianity caused his name to be changed from a Hebrew name of Saul to a Greco-Roman name of Paul (Acts 13:9). The name "Paul" remains a popular name among Gentiles while the name "Saul" (Solomon / Shlomo) remains popular among the Jews. I love to ask Messianic (Jew-want-to-be) Christians why that is. Paul, being the main author of the New Testament, traveled all over the Gentile world taking his message to them (see Romans 15:16) while Islam rejects God's covenant with Israel via Isaac (see Psalms 105:9,10) in order to accept their Gentle version of the Abrahamic covenant through the Gentile Ishmael (see Sura 37: 101-113). Christianity spread to the Gentile West via Rome while Islam spread throughout the Gentile Middle East via Mecca. But between both of these two massive bodies of land lies a very small strip of land that connects and a particular people with a eternal covenant. As with the onslaught of conversion efforts, isn't it spiritually strange that the Jews historically have received great persecutions in the form of physical attacks from both of the Christian and Islam nations (about 54% combined) while at the same time seeking the total conversion of the tiny Jewish nation, but you never hear or read about the Jewish people attacking either of them on the basis of their religion nor seeking their conversion to their faith?
.
Here are some amazing facts:
- The two great world faiths of Christianity and Islam that makes up more than half of the world’s population (54% combined) seeks the total conversion of the tiny Jewish nation (0.22% of the world’s population) to their religion and belief system. To really get a good mental picture of just how offset Judaism is in population compared to the top two major religions of the world (which just happen to be the only two rivals of Judaism) take a look at the graph at the top of this article and notice the big green and red areas representing Christianity and Islam world populations. Then compared those areas to the tiny (hard to see) thin blue line representing Jews in Judaism between the colored areas of Buddhism and the other minority religions.
- Evangelicals spend approximately 250 million dollars every year on Jewish evangelism including missions to Israel for the sole purpose of converting the Jew, while the Jews spend about 250 millions dollars less then the evangelicals in Gentile proselytizing. How about that for one-sided spending figures? Muslims countries spend billions per year on weapons and political methods intended for the killing off the Jews who will not convert to Islam. Any Jew who converts to Islam can become worry free of any terrorist attacks, just as any Jew who converts to Christianity no longer has to put up with eager missionaries looking for that Jew-feather to put in their Christian hat.
- It is possible for a Gentile to be righteous outside of Judaism, but in the eyes of both Christianity and Islam, a Jew cannot be righteous hanging onto Law of Moses while converting to Christianity or Islam. This fact has made Judaism the most tolerant of the three monotheistic religions towards those outside their faith. A good question to ponder: During the Crusades when the forces of Christian Europe were fighting the Islamic empire from which both sides included the killing of Jews, who during this time were the Jews striking up a war with?
- Both Christianity and Islam have made their boasts throughout their history that they, and only they are the new chosen people and are the spiritual replacement of the physical seed of Israel while the nation of Israel bends over backwards to downplay their being chosen of God.
“God's Only 'Chosen Person' is Jesus Christ, and those in Him” - The Preterist Archive -
web-site / Dennis Todd
“The people who are really chosen by God are the Muslims community which has gathered under God’s banner without regard to differences of races, nations, colors, and countries.”
- Sayid Qutb, Milestones along the Road, p. 238
According to the ancient Talmudic traditions, Israel was the very last (far from the first choice) that God picked to be His chosen people. According to the tradition, it was only because Israel accepted the covenant at Mt. Sinai after all the other nations refused it was how Israel came to become God’s chosen people. - Islam and Christianity which together makes up more than half of the world’s population have their foundations based on Judaism. Muslims will not recognized the New Testament as being from God, nor will the Christians recognize the Koran being from God, yet both Christianity and Islam recognize the Torah being from God. This fact is even more amazing when one considers the Jews were not liked and appreciated in both Christendom and Islamic worlds, yet their Torah was.
- Christianity and Islam are both based only upon religious creeds while Judaism is based on faith and a nation of people. If a Christian stops believing in Jesus he is no longer a Christian. If a Muslim stops believing in Muhammad he is no longer a Muslim. A Jew however, can stop believing in the Torah but he will still remain a Jew - an apostate Jew.
- Looking at the three great monotheistic religions from the outside, it is impossible for Judaism to be wrong in foundation while the other two monotheistic religions are right in their foundation. This is because without the Torah the New Testament and the Koran has no foundation thereby voiding any claim as the true religion. Therefore, is possible for Judaism to be right in its foundation and the other two be wrong because the Torah is not dependent on either the New Testament or the Koran in establishing its foundation as a true religion. Likewise, If you were to ask a Muslim that if he found out that Islam’s foundation was indeed proven to be false, what religion would he perceive as the next obvious choice as the correct religion? He would more than likely choose either Christianity or Judaism as the correct true religion. If you then were to ask a Christian the exact same question about Christianity, he would pick Judaism as the obvious correct religion. But if you would asked an observant Jew the same exact question regarding Judaism, there is no religion outside of Paganism that he could point to as the next best, obvious choice. There is a spiritual reason for this that goes beyond the time-line as to when each religion began. At the End of Days, when all things then becomes obvious, the world comes seeking the Jews for spiritual guidance.
Thus saith the LORD of hosts; In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that God is with you. - Zechariah 8:23
- Q. If all of Israel would have become Christianized in the first century would there be a modern Israel today?
A. Christian teaching in all of the New Testament reserves no special physical place on earth for the Christian believer, not even the physical land of Israel. The teaching of Jewish Zionism is nowhere found in the New Testament, only the doctrines of “spiritual Jerusalem” and of the spiritual “Israel of God” are taught. If all the Jews converted to Christianity in the first century there would be no peoples of the earth to embrace the spiritual concept of living in the promised land God gave to the ancient Israelites, for there would be no spiritual significant reason to do so. See: Romans 2:28, Romans 9, Galatians 4:26, Galatians 6:15,16 , Revelations 21:2 - Q. If all of Israel would have become Christianized in the first century would there be a people identifying themselves as descendants from Jacob (Israel) today?
A. The New Testament teaches that true Jews are the ones who become Christians and that the physical seed of Jacob has been replaced by a spiritual seed of faith to the believer. Therefore, had all of Israel converted to Christianity in the first century there would be no peoples of the earth identified as the descendants of Jacob for there would be no spiritual significant reason to keep track or a remembrance of that physical seed. It is also note worthy that the apostle Paul (the main author of the New Testament) did not have any physical seed of his own and instructed others to follow him in a vow of abstinence if they were spiritually able to do so (I Corinthians 7:8). While this type of vow may not be harmful to a “spiritual seed” doctrine, it can only deplete the physical seed of Israel while directly avoiding the promise that the physical seed of Israel will as numerous as the stars heaven and as the sands of the sea. Therefore this type of revelation also undermines any promises concerning the land of Israel, being that this physical land, spiritually and eternally belongs to a very physical people.
See St. John 4:20-23, Galatians 4:25,26, Acts 15:14-17 (the temple in Jerusalem) - Q. If all of Israel would have become Christianized in the first century, would the Law of Moses (by which Jews have remained Jews) be observed by any people on the earth today?
A. The New Testament teaches that the Law of Moses has been fulfilled and is no longer valid to the Christian believer. Paul’s letter to the Galatians clearly confirms this many times over. Therefore, had all of Israel converted to Christianity in the first century there would be no people remaining on the earth today recognizing themselves to be under the Law of Moses. This would also cause there to be no religion in the earth that is totally based on the Law of Moses - which is exactly how Jews are known as Jews today! Therefore, had all of Israel converted to Christianity in the first century there would be no people on the earth whose spiritual foundation is the Law of Moses, because there would be no spiritual significant reason to keep the Law of Moses. This would result in there being no Torah-believing Jews (therefore no Jews) on the earth - only complete Christian assimilation. See Acts 10:13-16 (symbolic) Romans 3:20, Romans 7:4-6, Romans 10:4, Galatians 2:16,21, Galatians 3:13, Galatians 5:2-3,6.
It is an absolute fact that the total conversion of today’s Jewish people (which again, is the aim of every evangelical missionary Christian) would wipe out the Jewish nation from the earth. There would be no more physical seed (a.k.a. chosen people) identified as physical Jews on the face of the earth. I know this sounds mean but it’s the truth in principle, that today's evangelicals are no different (other than not being violent) than Hamas or any other terrorist group that seeks to destroy God’s covenant with the Jews of which the Law of Moses is connected! They just simply use different techniques and methods from those who use terrorism tactics, but which this wasn't always the case. Crusade Christianity and Inquisition Christianity were as every bit evil in terrorizing to Jews as today's Islamic terrorists. Hamas tries to murder the Jews away from their covenant while evangelicals try to covert the Jews away from their covenant. One of their biggest techniques is trying to convince the Jew that the Law of Moses is no longer in effect. There is an onslaught by both the Arabs and the Christians (the basic whole of the Gentile world) to takeover Jewish Israel. The Arabs want to make Israel an assimilated Muslim nation like all the other Muslim nations under the name of Palestine, while the Christians wish to make Israel an assimilated Christians nation like all the other Christian nations, and it’s sad that the secular Israeli government is at fault for allowing both fronts to continue as well as to grow.
I can understand a caring Christian’s true desire for a spiritual revival among the Jewish nation with the belief that only through the Jewish conversion to Christianity can a such a revival occur. However, Christians, and especially the evangelical missionaries, must realize that is wasn’t through the conversion to Christianity that the nation of Israel has been preserved and still survives to this day after three thousand years of persecutions. On the contrary, the fact remains that it was the Jewish people’s dedication to the Torah and the Talmud that has kept the Jewish nation intact as a people and as a nation throughout their tough history. It was not through the conversion to Christianity that brought about the modern phenomenon of the in-gathering of Jews back to Israel during this last century. If the Jews hadn’t been Torah minded during the past two thousand years, there never would have been a physical Jewish people for God to gather back into Israel in the first place. Therefore the great spiritual phenomenon of Jews living once again in their ancient biblical homeland is directly based both spiritually and physically to the Law of Moses and not to any forms of Christianity or Jewish conversion into it. The ingathering of Jews back into their homeland is based on God’s promise through Israelite prophets who just so happened to believe in keeping the Torah of Moses at the time.
If God was wanting all the Jews to become Christians instead of remaining as Jews, He wouldn’t have allowed the Holocaust to happen. Why would He, when in the eyes of the Christian world, the Jews of Germany were supposedly turning their hearts towards Jesus in massive numbers? It is important to understand as well as it speaks volumes, that the two greatest times of mass Jewish conversion to Christianity (as well as mass assimilation) was just before the destruction of the second temple in Israel and just before the Holocaust in Germany! Isn’t that strange? Christian missionaries should realize that God has a special and unique way of doing things when it comes to the Jewish people. He always deals with Israel as a nation, not by a conversion here and a conversion there. It would be in the best interest for the Jews if the evangelicals would stop trying to convert the Jews and interfere with what God has planned for them according to His word that He has specifically spelled out by the Hebrew prophets..
But this shall be the covenant that I will cut with the house of Israel: After those days, says the LORD, I will put My law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. And they shall no more teach each man his neighbor and each man his brother, saying, Know the LORD; for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest of them, says the LORD. For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sins no more. - Jeremiah 31:33,34
9,629 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 9601 – 9629 of 9629A person typed online today
"𝐕𝐃𝐇: 𝐂𝐀𝐌𝐏𝐔𝐒 𝐋𝐄𝐅𝐓’𝐒 𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐓𝐎 𝟏,𝟐𝟎𝟎 𝐒𝐋𝐀𝐔𝐆𝐇𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐄𝐃 𝐉𝐄𝐖𝐒 𝐖𝐀𝐒 𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐄𝐅, 𝐍𝐎𝐓 𝐇𝐎𝐑𝐑𝐎𝐑
Historian Victor Davis Hanson described watching a switch flip inside elite university culture the moment October 7 news broke — not horror, relief.
“𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘸𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘯: 1,200 𝘑𝘦𝘸𝘴 𝘣𝘶𝘵𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥, 𝘳∗𝘱𝘦𝘥, 𝘮𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥, 𝘣𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘶𝘱, 𝘣𝘦𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘥, 4,000 𝘰𝘳 5,000 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘴𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘥, 5,000 𝘏∗𝘮𝘢𝘴 𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘯 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘬𝘪𝘣𝘣𝘶𝘵𝘻.”
Then he described the campus response to that news, word for word:
“𝘌𝘹𝘤𝘦𝘱𝘵 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵, 𝘢 𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘸𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘧𝘧. 𝘖𝘩 𝘮𝘺 𝘨𝘰𝘴𝘩, 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘴𝘰 𝘸𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘶𝘭. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺’𝘳𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘬!𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘑𝘦𝘸𝘴, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺’𝘳𝘦 𝘬!𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢 𝘭𝘰𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘐 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘣𝘳𝘢𝘨 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘪𝘵. 𝘞𝘦 𝘣𝘳𝘰𝘬𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘤𝘦. 𝘍𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘰𝘯, 𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘰𝘬𝘢𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘑𝘦𝘸𝘴, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘤𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘣𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘪𝘵.”
Hanson said that wasn’t a fringe reaction — it’s exactly what he watched happen in real time on campus, a mainstream shift in what elite students felt safe saying out loud.
The timeline backs him up. Within 48 hours of the massacre — before Israel had responded at all — student coalitions at Harvard, Columbia, and NYU were already organizing rallies blaming Israel for the attack that k!lled 𝟏,𝟐𝟎𝟎 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 and took 𝟐𝟓𝟏 𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐬 (Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs). Harvard’s own student groups signed a letter holding Israel “entirely responsible” the same week victims were still being identified.
𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐦𝐚𝐬𝐤 𝐝𝐢𝐝𝐧’𝐭 𝐬𝐥𝐢𝐩. 𝐈𝐭 𝐜𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐨𝐟𝐟."
Some people typed in reply
"I absolutely do NOT understand how people can blame Israel for the attack Hamas launched on them. These are college/university students at some of the most prestigious schools being fine with blaming Israel. What's wrong? Is it the student? Is it the college/university? Is it both? How do the same people who demand humanitarian efforts for hamas so easily reject humanitarian for the Jews? The word "humanitarian" is an adjective of "human." If not equally applied, it is meaningless."
"I remember seeing these demonstrations in real time on behalf of Hamas, etc.immediately following October 7th"
"I said Hamas are terrorists after 10/7 and that got me into LinkedIn Jail for 30 days."
"I am not surprised by the Positive reaction that was exhibited by students at these liberal universities, because the US government’s position since Nixon is that Israel can do more to appease the militant Muslims. From elementary school onward students are told that fighting is bad. That all differences can be negotiated away. That fighting is not tolerated. And peace is the only virtue between nations, Then they teach the basic history lesson: White men are oppressors of POC. For hundreds of years, whites enslaved POC. Therefore whites are bad. Looking at Israel, White Jewish men are oppressing the Arab Muslim Palestinians who are POC. The Jews are the oppressors, and the Palestinians are the oppressed. The Muslims who are oppressed have the right to resist their Jewish oppressors from Genocide and Apartheid in all ways. Those concepts are repeated everywhere. By the time they get to the university, these students are ready for more sophisticated antisemitisms turned into antizionism."
&
" It is, unfortunately, decades of indoctrination disguised as education. Indoctrination from so-called higher learning organizations like Harvard, in the news and even in TV a movies. I started noticing them being very heavy handed in their social messages, non-stop, all the way back to the 80s at the very least."
"Evil wears many faces. Never in my life would I have expected to see this level of open and blatant racism being embraced and endorsed in the United States."
"Courtesy of Qatar"
"They couldn't have done it without the help of the many millions of Antisemites throughout the world, who were just waiting for the chance to rip off their masks of "peace and compassion for all" and reveal their true identities! 🥺"
"Sad commentary regarding our youth"
" Worse than sad and a very telling comment about what they are being taught in schools."
" the Nazi generation; similar to 1930s Germany."
"Why are these universities getting taxpayer dollars? They should get NOTHING!"
"I was dumbfounded and heartbroken by the way my fellow citizens embraced this enormous Evil."
"Beyond belief! My parents were right! We are victims of this craziness yet again!"
"There's another thing no one is talking about. On October 6, Students for justice on Palestine posted on social media "WE'RE BACK!"
this was BEFORE the attacks. They KNEW! It needs to be investigated who knew what and failed to alert authorities and how involved they were. How far before the attacks did campus organizations know to be prepared to protest?"
"We all saw the presidents of MIT, Harvard, and Penn subsequently embarrass themselves in front of Congress. The Penn president did the honorable thing and resigned immediately, the Harvard president was soon exposed as a lying, plagiarizing, DEI-hire fraud and was forced to resign, but the DEI MIT president remains, resisting the Trump administration's effort to bring back integrity and ideological freedom to academia."
"Democrats- the party of Hamas"
"yes and sadly"
"What is so shocking to me is that an academic institution, an Ivy league academic institution at that, not only allowed their disgraceful behavior, it taught them the hate they were acting out and gave them security to behave in such despicable ways. I expected academic institutions to educate people, to teach them history and ethics, which they obviously gave up on years ago, and to be less barbaric and reject the ignorance displayed by the protesters who obviously were uneducated, amoral, and had not learned a single thing."
Another person typed online today
"Report: Jews Once Again Caught Existing
Authorities confirmed Wednesday that the Jewish people have once again been caught existing.
The discovery has alarmed activists, academics, diplomats, and several people on the internet with Palestinian flags in their bios and no visible understanding of Ottoman land law.
“This is obviously concerning,” said Professor Dalton Beige, Chair of Postcolonial Vibes at a university whose endowment could purchase three small nations and still have money left for a faculty antisemitism workshop. “Most ancient peoples had the decency to disappear into museums. But Jews keep showing up. They pray. They build. They invent medicine. They argue over bagels and falafel. Frankly, it raises questions.”
The questions are serious.
Why do Jews keep contributing to science, law, literature, philosophy, civil rights, comedy, technology, and every deli within a respectable driving distance?
Why do they insist on teaching their children to read ancient texts, ask annoying questions, remember dead relatives, feed strangers, honor education, call their mothers, and survive things that were absolutely supposed to finish them?
And perhaps most troubling of all, why did they return to their ancestral homeland and build a country instead of remaining permanently available as a convenient moral lesson for everyone else?
Investigators say the answer may involve Zionism, the dangerous belief that Jews, like nearly every other people on earth, are allowed self-determination.
“When Irish people want Ireland, that’s liberation,” Professor Beige explained. “When Greeks want Greece, that’s heritage. When Armenians want Armenia, that’s survival. But when Jews want Israel, suddenly everyone needs a panel discussion, a glossary, and a panic attack.”
At press time, several experts warned that Zionism relies heavily on history, archaeology, Hebrew, continuous Jewish presence, ancient texts, modern law, prayer, memory, and the basic ability to read.
“This is why we prefer slogans,” said campus organizer Skylar, who requested anonymity because accountability is colonial. “History creates confusion. Slogans create community.”
&
continues
"Skylar later clarified that she does not hate Jews, only Jews who believe Jews should not be defenseless.
“That’s antizionism,” she said. “Totally different.”
Meanwhile, Jewish communities have responded to rising hostility in their usual suspicious manner: lighting candles, gathering for Shabbat, raising money for victims, singing ancient songs, feeding people, defending themselves, and refusing to apologize for being alive.
“This is classic Jewish behavior,” warned a spokesperson for the International Committee Against Context. “First they survive. Then they remember. Then they rebuild. Then they open a hospital where everyone gets treated, including people who hate them. It’s manipulative compassion.”
Israel has faced particular scrutiny for its disturbing habit of preventing missiles from landing on children.
“The Iron Dome creates an unfair imbalance,” said U.N. Deputy Assistant Undersecretary for Symmetrical Suffering Martin Flimsy. “When fewer Jews die, it becomes more difficult to condemn them proportionally.”
Asked whether Israel should simply allow rockets to hit its cities, Flimsy frowned.
“Nobody is saying that,” he said. “We are simply saying Israel should defend itself in a way that satisfies people who do not believe it should exist.”
This position has gained support among those who believe every nation has a right to self-defense, except the Jewish one, which must first defend its right to defend itself.
At a recent protest, demonstrators demanded peace by calling for the elimination of the world’s only Jewish state.
“We want coexistence,” shouted one protester, “from the river to the sea, but with no Jews having sovereignty anywhere between the river and the sea.”
Asked where the Jews should go, the protester suggested Poland, Germany, Iraq, Yemen, Morocco, Russia, Spain, or “wherever they originally came from.”
When informed Jews had been expelled, persecuted, or murdered in many of those places, the protester paused thoughtfully.
“Well,” he said, “they probably caused that too.”
Jewish leaders responded by sighing in 4,000 years of fluent exhaustion.
“Every generation gets its remix,” said Rabbi Miriam Cohen. “Once we poisoned wells. Then we controlled banks. Now we are white European colonizers indigenous to nowhere despite praying toward Jerusalem before most modern nations had vowels.”
She paused.
“Nu, at least the conspiracy theories are getting lazier.”
Despite the accusations, Jews continue behaving suspiciously. They plant trees. They start companies. They write books. They win Nobel Prizes at a statistically annoying rate. They send rescue teams after earthquakes. They argue with God. They argue with each other. They make jokes during funerals and food during crises.
Worst of all, they keep choosing life."
&
"This has baffled their enemies for centuries.
Pharaoh tried slavery. Failed.
Haman tried genocide. Failed.
Rome tried exile. Failed.
Spain tried expulsion. Failed.
The Nazis tried industrialized murder. Failed.
Terrorists tried slaughter. Failed.
College sophomores tried Instagram infographics.
Results pending.
Through it all, Jews kept saying the same outrageous thing.
Am Yisrael Chai.
The people of Israel live.
Not because life has been easy.
Because surrender was never part of the covenant.
And that may be the real scandal.
The Jews are not insidious because they want power. They are “insidious” because they refuse powerlessness.
They are not dangerous because they want war. They are dangerous to lies because they want peace without suicide.
They are not immoral because they defend sovereignty. They are intolerable to hypocrites because they insist Jewish blood is not the entrance fee to global sympathy.
The world has always preferred its Jews quiet, grateful, nervous, and dependent.
Zionism replied: no, thank you.
A Jew with a suitcase is tragic.
A Jew with a passport is complicated.
A Jew with an army is apparently a global emergency.
So yes, beware the insidious Jews.
They may cure your disease.
They may write your favorite movie.
They may argue your case before the court.
They may make you laugh so hard you forget you were supposed to hate them.
They may invite you to dinner, overfeed you, and send you home with leftovers in containers they absolutely expect back.
And if you try to kill them, they may do the most unforgivable thing in Jewish history.
They may live."
A Newspaper is shown
Saying
"THE DAILY OUTRAGE
All the news that fits our narrative
REPORT:
JEWS ONCE AGAIN CAUGHT EXISTING
Authorities confirm ancient people
still refuse to vanish after 3,000 years of trying
By I.P. Freely
July 24, 2026
Some people typed in reply
" piss off the haters and keep on existing"
"I say Shalom Motherfuckers!"
"The name of the article's author is an an alias of Bart Simpson in one of his crank calls to Moe's Tavern."
"hysterical and unfortunately biting truth"
&
"Read a similar article by Jack Meoff."
"great minds"
"Glad to see people out there finally addressing the problem."
"Beware of the Jews. They are so good it’s addictive."
"That’s right we bad!"
"How dare we!"
"I want to laugh hysterically, but the bit about the world trying to destroy them is too true.
Bravo sir!"
"🇮🇱❤️🇮🇱"
"Zionism is the belief in the Jewish people’s right to self-determination in our ancestral homeland of Israel. It affirms that Jews, like all peoples, have the right to live in safety, dignity, and sovereignty in a nation of their own.
Antizionists incessantly repeat 3 core libels: Colonizer, Apartheid, Genocide to construct Israel and Jews as evil demons that need to be purged or murdered."
Another person typed online today
"The entire antizionist explosion since October 7 has been an attempt to invert and conceal support for these barbaric acts."
In reply to a person posting
"Having seen the infamous 47-minute compilation of the 7 Oct atrocities with my own eyes (not publicly available), I can attest that the Silenced No More report, which is freely available online, is even worse. It's just words on a page, but it leaves enough to the imagination to be even more horrific than the video. At least for me.
In the 47-minute compilation, there is some evidence of sexual sadism, but not much. Probably for two reasons: proud though Hamas was of massacring Jews, they were less keen on broadcasting scenes of sexual depravity. And the Israeli government likely declined to include the most horrific footage out of respect for the victims.
The report is exhaustively documented, horror story after horror story. I've read it only once, and I won't do so again. Especially the sections about the Nova festival are extremely disturbing. So I asked Claude to summarize the documented patterns in the report:
- Rape and gang rape, with victims passed between attackers in sequence, witnesses describing laughter throughout
- Targeted gunshots to groin, abdomen, buttocks and face; genital mutilation of both women and men
- Rape followed by execution—victims shot or stabbed immediately afterward, some shot in the head during the assault
- Rape continuing after victims were dead
- Sexual mutilation—breasts severed, genitals cut off or shot
- Burning, including deliberate burning of the groin; bodies set alight with accelerants
- - Hands bound behind backs; bodies tied to trees and poles along the road
- Sharp objects inserted into victims' genitals
- Women raped in view of their desperate partners, who were then killed
- Male victims gang-raped, beaten, and threatened with castration
- Dismemberment and decapitation
These findings of systematic sexual violence and torture are corroborated by the UN Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict (2024) and the UN Commission of Inquiry (2024).
Just one quote from a survivor:
"I heard one rape where they were passing her around. She was probably injured, judging by her screams—screams you have never heard anywhere. It's between silence and screams, between pain and wanting to die. These are screams... it's something I have never heard in my life, and I have no way to explain to you what it sounds like. But it's screams. It's screams. It was simply horrific. And after one finished, he told another to go up 'Ta'al' [in Arabic], like to the next one. And apparently there was a round... And after they finished, they shot her." She continued: "You hear the screams, and then you hear silence. You hear a bang—and silence. And then there's a kind of calm. And then you say: okay, it's over at least. She's done with it. And like that with each person they abused—you heard. The moment they were killed, I said, 'Oh my God, finally, it's over.'"
You privileged Westerners have no idea how you would react if this happened to you and your loved ones—if a group committed these atrocities, vowed to repeat them again and again, and openly declared that it would not stop until your country no longer existed. You have no idea."
The New York Post nypost.com has an article
"Mayor Mamdani’s constant anti-Israel obsessions endanger NYC’s Jews"
By Post Editorial Board
Published July 24, 2026
pasadenanow.com has an article
"Community Mural Created in Response to Antisemitism Defaced at Pasadena Synagogue"
Published on Friday, July 24, 2026
Also from the New York Post
nypost.com an article
"Mamdani pushes the Jewish hate that leads to ‘Allahu Akbar’ stabbing"
By Liel Leibovitz
Published July 24, 2026
A person typed online today
"Post by ------- (prior to the stabbings) has an especially good discussion about the genocide libel the Mayor is perpetuating and repeated in his statement. Of all the libels: IMO this one is the most likely culprit/precursor to violence.
“Yesterday, the mayor of NYC released a video explaining why he cannot arrest the prime minister of Israel if he comes to New York. Hardly a shocking conclusion. But the video itself is grotesque and disturbing, and within twenty-four hours, it has been viewed by more than 88M people – about six times the entire Jewish population of the world.
Professionals whose purview is to refute the video's claims have already done so. What compels me to write instead is how profoundly personal this is.
Mamdani's opening sentence is: "Benjamin Netanyahu is a war criminal, the architect of a horrific genocide against the Palestinian people."
I ask you to think carefully about what he is saying.
A genocide is not committed by one individual. To call someone "the architect of a genocide" is necessarily to accuse many other people of carrying it out. Netanyahu is merely the effigy that Mamdani would like to parade through the streets and hang on a noose. The accusation extends to the Israeli army – a citizen army made up of ordinary Israelis like my husband, and my nephew, and my brother-in-law, and my cousin – who all serve alongside their fellow citizens since Israel has mandatory military service, and do so proudly to defend their country that is under constant attack and the constant threat of annihilation. The accusation extends to Israeli society, which has differing opinions on Netanyahu and the war, and which constitutes a democratic country with checks and balances, and whose government derives its authority from the people.
In other words, the mayor you voted for has accused my husband and his family and my family, and their whole nation.
I have a real problem with that, and I have a real problem that you voted for someone who would abuse his office to such a great extent as to spread the libel that my family are guilty of the most evil crime imaginable (of which they happen to have been victims).
"Genocide" is not simply another word for "devastation" or "war with lots of casualties."
There are countless facts that dispute the obscene accusation that Israel's objective is the extermination of the Palestinian people, a goal Israel patently possesses the military capability to pursue from the air alone if it so desired. Yet more than 1,000 Israeli soldiers – including my brother-in-law's nephew – have been killed in ground operations. I ask you to consider: why would that be? If the goal were simply to kill all the Palestinians and Israel could achieve that without losing a single Israeli life, why have over 1,000 Israeli soldiers been killed? Why is there no equivalent devastation in Judea and Samaria (what many of you know as the 'West Bank')? Why are 2 million Arab-Israelis, many of whom identify as Palestinian, perfectly safe in Israel?"
& continues
"In an actual genocide, like the Holocaust, which killed half of my husband's family, it did not matter if you were a Jew in Germany, a Jew in Poland, a Jew in Greece...it did not matter whether you were on the Right or the Left, whether you were assimilated or not, whether you were a Zionist or not, whether you had protested the government or not...the goal was the elimination of the Jewish people. The result was six million murders – 35% of the entire worldwide Jewish population – and a global population that is still smaller than it was before said genocide occurred 80 years prior.
Reasonable people can disagree about politicians, strategy, goals, and governments; but to accuse Israel – the Israeli people – of genocide is something dangerously different, and we have spent the past two and half years watching in despair the consequences of that accusation for Israelis and Jews around the world. I am devastated that this rhetoric has come to NY, the city in which my great-grandparents found refuge from the pogroms of Eastern Europe a century ago, which, remarkably enough, were violent attacks caused by extremist rhetoric and libels, including from powerful local politicians.
Despite the prominence given to a relatively small number of anti-Zionist Jewish public figures and whatever a severely biased media may report about what "polls" show about the TikTok generation, as of this moment, most of world Jewry and even most of American Jewry are Zionists – and Mamdani has just put a target on all of our backs.
If you don't understand why so many Jews have reacted to this video with fear rather than merely political disagreement, I sincerely hope you'll ask.
Because Netanyahu is merely the effigy."
Another person typed online today
"You know what antisemitic propaganda never made sense to me? The whole category of money and Jews tropes.
Everyone likes money. Everyone wants money. But the whole banker idea, Jewish businessmen giving each other the best deals, etc…isn’t that something you would want your own community(religious/ethnic/whatever) to emulate? Helping each other out, giving each other a leg up? You haven’t tried to make something work for a friend or family member before?
If anything, I’d be disgusted if my own community isn’t doing it. Honestly, the trope is just a projection of jealousy that your own community doesn't help each other out."
Some people typed in reply
"The one about Jews being cheap never made sense because I’ve never met a Jew who wasn’t extremely generous to people who treat them well."
"Jews are the largest donators to many causes that aren’t even Jewish"
"It's amazing how many core tenets of The Protocols of The Elders of Zion survive to poison and influence modern Jew-hatred. Of course, many of them were not novel at the time of the writing."
"Asian and African culture is very big on wealth and prosperity and no one bats an eye."
"My Jewish freinds must not have gotten the memo that they control the world. Im also still waiting for my paycheck from George Soros"
"dude me too! Let me know when you get it so I can call payroll."
"I WISH some of these theories were true ....it's so nice of the gentiles to think that we ALL GET ON SO WELL to the point where we are secretly sharing money ......cuz if that's the case my ass would be off grid permanently"
"Tell me what you accuse the Jew of and I’ll tell you what you are guilty of"
"Somebody said, "we like our minorities until they become successful."
"If there's some global conspiracy to steal all the world's wealth, there must be some Jew out here with two shares, because I'm working my ass off out here!"
Harlan Ellison
A person typed online today
"Pay close attention because you don’t have to be too intelligent to get this.
You don’t have to be a mathematician to make sense of it.
You say Israel dropped 200,000 bombs on Gaza and you use that as proof of genocide.
So far so good? Great.
You also say that Israel killed over 70,000 innocent Gazans.
Correct? Ok.
Do I have to spell it out for you?
If Israel was trying to commit genocide, please explain to me how, according to YOUR numbers, 200,000 bombs only killed 70,000.
I’m gonna wait and let you think about that for a second.
Unless you think that each one of those bombs dropped by Israel didn’t have the ability to kill at least one person, and unless you agree that Israel did more than any army in history to minimize civilian death, how do 200,000 bombs equal 70,000 dead?
Let’s just say that each one of those bombs killed only five people. That’s a million dead Gazans.
Even you don’t think Israel killed a million Gazans.
So make it make sense.
As the cool kids say, “The math ain’t mathin.”
While we’re on the topic of illogical things that antisemites believe about Israel, tell me this.
If Israel is so terrible to its neighbors, if Israel is such an evil apartheid state, kindly explain to me why the people who call themselves Palestinians, hundreds of thousands of them, apply for job permits in Israel on a regular basis.
If Israel is so terrible, why do they want to come into Israel?
Should we continue? Let’s continue. This is fun.
If Israel is a colonialist state looking to steal land, why is Israel still smaller than New Jersey?"
& continues
"Ok, now let’s kick it up a notch here.
Tell me, what do the following names have in common?
* Samer Haj Yehia: Former chairman of the board of Bank Leumi.
* The Dabbah Family: Owners of one of Israel’s largest meat production, import, and retail distribution enterprises.
* Julia Zahar: Founder and owner of the prominent tahini brand Al-Arz, widely stocked across national supermarket chains.
* Lucy Aharish: Award-winning journalist and news anchor on mainstream Hebrew-language television in Israel.
* Makram Khoury: Celebrated stage and film actor who won the prestigious Israel Prize for his contributions to theater.
* Hiam Abbass: Internationally acclaimed actress and director known for major roles in both Israeli cinema and global productions like Succession.
* Mansour Abbas: Leader of the United Arab List (Ra'am) party in the Israeli parliament.
* Mohammed Kana’an: Founder and CEO of the logistics company A. Kanaan Group.
* Ahmad Tibi: Veteran Knesset member known for his parliamentary speeches and medical background.
* Prof. Salman Zarka: Director of Ziv Medical Center and former COVID-19 coordinator for Israel.
* Nasrin Kadri: One of Israel’s most successful singers, performing primarily in Hebrew.
* Rana Raslan: Former Miss Israel and one of the country’s best-known Arab public figures.
Want to guess? I’ll give you a minute.
Those people are Arabs in Israel holding prominent positions they’d never have in any Arab state, but in Israel, they thrive.
How exactly does that fit into your narrative about Israel being a racist apartheid state?
Speaking of apartheid, and now you are going to need to do some math, please spend a few minutes calculating the total number of Jews in Arab states.
Here, I’ll help you out because I’m nice like that.
How many Jews live in Algeria, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Somalia, Mauritania, Djibouti, and Comoros, Iraq, Egypt, and Lebanon cumulatively?
Need a second? It’s complicated math, I know.
The answer is a whopping 0. That’s a zero.
Zero Jews live in all of these Arab countries.
Zero. Not one.
Want to know something even crazier than that?"
&
"In 1948, the main Arab countries + Iran held roughly 850,000 to 1 million Jews.
Now, tell me again who is guilty of ethnic cleansing: Israel, where millions of Arabs live with total freedom and achieve high levels of success, or the Arab world that has actively kicked all Jews out of their countries?
What would happen if I walked into an Arab town, city, or country as a Jew who doesn’t hide his identity?
What would happen to me if I entered a mall in Ramallah and walked around just like Muslims walk around freely in Israeli malls?
Would I be welcome there? Would you?
So now that we’ve established that there’s no genocide, no apartheid, no colonialism, and no ethnic cleansing, let’s debunk another one of the ridiculous accusations against Israel.
Israel steals American money by taking billions of foreign aid from the American taxpayer?
Wow, billions of dollars? That sounds like so much money…
And now let’s put that in perspective, shall we?
First of all, 92% of the U.S. Foreign Military Financing (FMF) provided to Israel must be spent in the United States on American products and services.
Did you catch that? 92% of the aid that goes to Israel is then put back into the American economy.
But that’s not even the best part.
Approximately 0.2% of the U.S. GDP is spent on foreign aid. That is about two-tenths of one percent.
In dollar terms, that’s roughly $60 billion to $70 billion per year in recent years, while U.S. GDP is about $30 trillion.
Ok, but how much of that $60 billion to $70 billion goes to Israel? Probably all of it, right?
You’re cute.
Well, if I was judging by the amount of pushback that aid to Israel gets, I’d assume it was 100% of it or close.
So I get where you’re coming from…
So get this. Out of the $60 billion to $70 billion in U.S. foreign aid, $3.3 billion went to Israel last year.
So Israel received about 5% to 6% of U.S. foreign aid.
So again, 0.2% of America’s GDP goes to foreign aid, and out of that, approximately 5% goes to Israel, and 92% of that aid is then poured back into the American economy.
Compare that to Ukraine, for example.
In fiscal year 2025, the United States disbursed approximately $6.7 billion in foreign assistance for Ukraine.
That’s about double the amount sent to Israel.
Remind me again how many bills were passed in Congress to try and stop funding to Ukraine?
Remind me how many organizations have tried to force America to stop sending foreign aid to any country besides Israel?
Now why would there be so much noise surrounding American foreign aid to Israel and absolutely zero noise about foreign aid to any other country?
“Yea, but AIPAC pays off politicians. That is a foreign government controlling U.S. politics!!”
&
"Oh really now…
Let’s start with the fact that AIPAC is an American lobby. Like any other American lobby, AIPAC lobbies to maintain the strong U.S.-Israel relationship.
Repeat after me: AIPAC is American. American!
“But they’re lobbying for a foreign group, not for Americans!”
Fair point.
Are there any other lobbies that do the same, or is it just AIPAC? Well, let’s see.
* NAACP: Lobbies for African Americans.
* National Urban League: Ditto. African Americans.
* LULAC: Lobbies for Hispanics and Latinos.
* Asian Americans Advancing Justice: The name speaks for itself.
* National Congress of American Indians: Lobbies for Native Americans.
* Arab American Institute
* Armenian National Committee of America
* Council on American-Islamic Relations
Should I continue?
“Yes, but they are so powerful and so big. No other lobby is that powerful!”
Is that so…?
If we’re comparing federal lobbying expenditures (the money organizations report spending to lobby Congress and the executive branch), AIPAC is nowhere near the top 10.
AIPAC reported about $3.3 million in federal lobbying expenditures in 2024 (the most recent finalized OpenSecrets figure), placing it around 191st among lobbying organizations.
Recent estimates put its annual lobbying in roughly the $3 million to $4.5 million range.
Let’s look at some lobbyists and how they compare to AIPAC, shall we?
* U.S. Chamber of Commerce: $72 million, which is approximately 22 times the size of AIPAC.
* National Association of Realtors: $54 million, 16 times AIPAC.
* PhRMA (pharmaceutical industry): $38.2 million, 12 times AIPAC.
* American Hospital Association: $30 million, 9 times AIPAC.
* Blue Cross Blue Shield Association: $29 million, 9 times AIPAC.
* American Medical Association: $27 million, 8 times AIPAC.
* Meta (lobbying for the company): $25 million, 7 times AIPAC.
* Amazon: $25 million, 7 times AIPAC.
Oh, and it’s not only those kinds of lobbies that are bigger than AIPAC.
There are many political ones, too.
Here are some examples:
* NRA
* EMILY's List
* Planned Parenthood
* League of Conservation Voters
* Club for Growth
* Americans for Prosperity
* American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO)
In other words, AIPAC is NOT run by a foreign government, nor is it the largest—or even close to the largest—lobby in America.
Listen, I can go on for hours debunking the lies being told about Israel, but by now, you should have gotten the point.
What’s the point?
Good question, thought you’d never ask.
The point is, you’ve been duped!
Israel is literally none of the things you’ve been told:
* Israel didn’t commit anything remotely resembling a genocide.
* Israel is the opposite of apartheid.
* Israel colonized no one and nothing.
* Israel ethnically cleansed no one. Jews, on the other hand, were ethnically cleansed by Arab states.
* American aid to Israel is not what you think it is.
* AIPAC is not even close to as big and powerful as people pretend it is.
So, the next time someone tells you some blood libel about the only Jewish state—a country smaller than New Jersey and the only free democracy in the Middle East—you might want to question it."
&
"You really don’t have to invest too much time. Use your favorite AI agent and ask if what you were just told is true or false.
Don’t like AI? Go old school and ask Google.
Unless, of course, you don’t care about the truth and you are more concerned with vilifying the Jews than you are about being accurate and trustworthy.
The truth?
The truth is Israel is a beacon of light in a very dark world.
The truth is that Israel enhanced your life significantly.
Israel built the chip of the device you are currently looking at.
The truth is that Israel leads the world in cancer research and is first on the scene when there’s a natural disaster anywhere in the world, including in countries that are hostile towards Israel.
The truth is that Jews make up 0.2% of the global population and have been awarded over 20% of Nobel Prizes.
The truth is Israel wants peace. Peace is all Israel ever wanted.
The truth is Israel has proven time and time again that it’s willing to pay a very steep price to achieve peace.
The truth is that Israel leads the world in innovation across all sectors.
The truth is Israel is a breathtakingly beautiful country. No, literally—it’ll take your breath away.
The truth is that Israelis are some of the happiest people on earth.
The truth is that if you’ve spent the better part of your adult life trashing Israel and the Jews and you finally saw the light, Israel would welcome you with open arms to experience the modern-day miracle that is the State of Israel.
The truth is, if all that doesn’t convince you, then consider this:
Throughout generations, throughout history, endless empires—world-leading empires—came after the Jews.
Without exception, every single one of them went extinct.
They went extinct while this tiny little nation called the Jews is here, thriving, flourishing, and showing no signs of slowing down.
So if you don’t side with the Jews because of morality, side with the Jews because we are the winning team, and let’s be honest, no one likes to be a loser.
And to you people out there who hate the Jews no matter what, I have five words for you:
Am Yisrael Chai, you fool!
The nation of Israel lives, and you, sir/ma’am, will end up a footnote in a history book where you’ll join the esteemed group of members that includes the empires of ancient Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome, Spain, Soviet, and Germany, to name a few.
Your move."
Some people typed in reply
"I love seeing the truth and even better backed up by facts. Unfortunately as you said the people who need to read it and see it won't believe it. They are just too brainwashed, or are Jew haters. Stop the hate. Stop the propaganda. Stop the lies. Stop the antisemitism. Stop inciting violence. 😡😡"
"Power to truth. Sadly so many people will refuse to accept this information because they are so invested in Jews been the aggressors and a genocidal people.
I am truly astonished at how so many useful idiots just lap up the Muslim propaganda"
"Unfortunately, there are none so deaf as those who will not listen."
"They will continue to be deceived because they didn’t want to know the truth in the first place. Can never understand how people prefer lies to the truths. They actually choose the lies every time. To be against Israel is to be against God. 🇮🇱"
"Facts are not of interest to the Jew haters.
They can't do anything with facts so they use emotion and lies."
"I'm in Florida saying pretty much the same thing you’re saying here.
People are just so ignorant because instead of using their God-given brains, they parrot what they have heard with itching ears."
A website posted online today
"Where does the whole “baby killers” thing come from?
A basic concept in marketing is that you don’t need to reinvent the wheel. You just need to rebrand it.
In medieval Europe, whenever a child went missing, people would often make up false stories claiming it was the Jews who kidnapped the child, killed them, and, hold on tight… used their blood to bake matzah for Passover.
This accusation was completely false and made no sense whatsoever. In Judaism, blood is not kosher and must be completely removed from food. I’m no expert on European cuisine, but to the best of my knowledge, it’s Europeans themselves who have traditionally eaten blood in certain dishes. In Judaism, it is strictly forbidden. Especially human blood, which is unthinkable and would be regarded as an extreme violation of Jewish law.
Those false allegations led mobs to carry out pogroms against Jews. They murdered many of them, expelled entire communities, and tortured innocent people before the accusations were eventually disproved. Then the next blood libel would come along, and the cycle would repeat.
Some of the most famous blood libel cases include:
👉 William of Norwich (1144): After a young boy was found dead in Norwich, Jews were falsely accused of murdering him as part of a religious ritual. This became the first major blood libel in England and helped spread the myth across Europe.
👉 Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln (1255): When an eight-year-old boy was found dead, Jews were falsely blamed for his murder. Around 90 Jews were arrested, and 18 were executed.
👉 Simon of Trent (1475): After the disappearance of a two-year-old boy, Jews in Trent were falsely accused of ritual murder. Many were executed.
The propaganda machine in Gaza understood that much of its audience already associated Jews with killing children because of centuries of antisemitic myths. So why not harness that same narrative in their eternal war against Zionism?
It’s not like Israel has killed more civilians than the Allies did in Iraq and Afghanistan. Quite the contrary. Not to mention Germany and Japan during World War II. But meh, they’re allowed to kill civilians as a byproduct of their war against terrorism.
The Jews, however… they’ve been killing kids for millennia already.
So the next time you hear the “baby killers” accusation, you’ll know the centuries-old context.
Image credit: “Burning of the Jews,” woodcut from the Nuremberg Chronicle (Liber Chronicarum), 1493. Woodcut by Michael Wolgemut and Wilhelm Pleydenwurff (workshop attribution). Public domain. "
A person typed online today
"After acknowledging that New York City has no independent legal authority to execute the International Criminal Court’s arrest warrant of Bibi, Mamdani chose to transform that legal reality into a televised political spectacle.
His address made no mention of Arab Hamas or the October 7 massacre of innocent civilians. Instead, he delivered a sweeping moral indictment of Israel while erasing the terrorist atrocities that ignited the war."
A person typed in reply
"A Jewish man walked out of Mincha on the Upper West Side this afternoon. A stranger drove a screwdriver into his chest. The fast is not over yet.
The sun has not set. Mouths are dry. Kitchens stay quiet. In shuls the low chairs are gone, but the day has not released us.
This afternoon he prayed Mincha at the Jewish Center on West 86th Street—the great pale-stone building raised more than a century ago by Jews who intended to remain. They built a sanctuary, classrooms, a library, a gym, even a pool. A declaration in stone: We are here. We belong here. He stood with the minyan. He bowed at Modim. He heard the words said only on a fast day: Answer us, Hashem, answer us on the day of our fast, for we are in great distress.
Then he walked outside into the bright July afternoon.
A few minutes later a stranger stabbed him in the chest with a screwdriver. Witnesses said the attacker shouted “Allahu Akbar.”
The injured man pulled the screwdriver out of his own body. He was afraid that if he fell, the weight of his body would drive it deeper.
Read that again.
A few moments earlier his hand had rested against his heart during the Amidah. Now it held the instrument meant to kill him.
Nava Silton, the youth director who had just spoken with him, ran downstairs and found that the victim was the man she had been talking to. A witness on the steps of a nearby church heard the shout and saw the stabbing. The attacker then walked past and remarked that someone should call 911—as if he had merely discovered the violence rather than caused it.
A few blocks away a 57-year-old Asian man was stabbed in the back. The two victims did not know each other. Neither appears to have known the attacker.
Police arrested 51-year-old Raul Morales. Both men were taken to Mount Sinai Morningside and are expected to survive. The NYPD is investigating the assaults as possible hate crimes. Victims and witnesses reported the same declaration during both attacks.
Those are the known facts as of this evening.
Here is another: It is still Tisha B’Av.
Already the machinery of qualification has begun. Wait for the motive. Do not draw conclusions. Perhaps the kippah was incidental. Perhaps the location was incidental. Perhaps the shouted words were incidental. Perhaps everything is incidental except the blood.
Enough.
We can wait for investigators without surrendering our capacity to see what is in front of us. A visibly Jewish man left a synagogue on Tisha B’Av and was stabbed in the chest by an attacker reportedly invoking God. Jewish fear in New York is not paranoia.
It is observation.
There is a strange burden placed on Jews whenever Jewish blood is spilled. Before we know whether the victim will live, we are summoned to prove that our grief is responsible. We must speak carefully. We must reassure everyone. We must mourn in a manner that causes no inconvenience.
Not tonight."
& continues
"Tonight a Jewish man is in the hospital because someone drove a metal tool into his chest after he walked out of shul. Our first obligation is not to manage the sensitivities of people who find Jewish alarm embarrassing. Our obligation is to tell the truth without trembling.
Visible Jews in this city have learned to perform calculations other New Yorkers rarely make. Which subway is safest? Should I cover my kippah? Should my son tuck in his tzitzis? Is the man behind me merely walking in the same direction?
Fear does not always arrive screaming. Sometimes it is a hand reaching automatically toward the top of the head. This is how a free Jewish life contracts: one small calculation at a time.
For months the boundary between political protest and open menace has collapsed. Synagogues have become demonstration sites. Jewish students have been surrounded. “Zionist” is increasingly used not to describe an opinion but to revoke a person’s moral standing. The Jew is told that none of this is about him.
But it is. Gone are the days where we didn’t have to scan the crowds around us."
A person also typed online today
"Arab men slaughtered three generations of the Bibas family. They strangled little Jewish babies, Ariel and Kfir.
And virtually the entire world sided not with the Jewish victims but with the Arab murderers.
Where half the adults in the world hate the Jew, this is to be expected.
Hatred of the Jew is so embedded in their DNA for thousands of years that the just can’t stomach the fighting Jew.
The only difference between the pogrom of October 2023 and thousands of other pogroms by Muslims and Christians against the Jew, for millennia, is now the Jewish nation has a brilliant army and can fight back.
Thank goodness for this miraculous and brilliant nation.
It’s the Jews only hope in this savage world."
&
"In three years since the Arab pogrom against the Jew, Israel has delivered justice to about two percent of the Arabs in Gaza, almost all of whom were Arab Hamas terrorists.
That’s some genocide!!!
If Israel wanted genocide, it could have turned Gaza into a parking lot on October 8.
It didn’t.
If Israel wanted genocide, it could have eliminated two million Arab Israeli citizens.
It didn’t.
Every person who blood-libels the Jewish nation with “genocide” is a filthy Jew-hater."
A person typed online today
"Democracy and Freedom of Expression, 1986-2026
Democracy 40 years ago:
Freedom of expression should respect Judeo-Christian sensitivities.
Democracy 20 years ago:
Freedom of expression is absolute and need not respect Judeo-Christian sensitivities. Nevertheless, a nasty remark or unwelcome joke may instantly trigger a ruinous lawsuit.
Democracy in 2026:
Freedom of expression is absolutely absolute—except that you must never, ever be offensive, hurtful, or critical toward any minority deemed oppressed. Doing so may lead to boycotts, vandalism, dogpiling, cancellation, mobbing, and dismissal from schools, universities, corporations, and the worlds of art, film, and publishing.
How does one qualify as a victim of oppression?
According to two very simple and transparent criteria:
1) Reflectance spectrophotometry certifying that you and your ethnic community have an average Melanin Index (MI) of at least 130.
2) Agreement among the editors of the BBC, CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, The Huffington Post, and The Guardian that your community’s loyalty to progressive causes and/or its socioeconomic failures entitle you to fight and despise its oppressors.
How does one qualify as an oppressor?
According to two equally simple and transparent criteria:
1) Reflectance spectrophotometry certifying that you and your community have an average Melanin Index below 100.
2) Succeeding socioeconomically and/or regarding the editors of BBC, CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, The Huffington Post, and The Guardian as fools, frauds, and racists themselves, because they judge human beings and their problems chiefly by the findings of reflectance spectrophotometry rather than by character or behavior.
P.S. Note that members of oppressed minorities who side with the oppressor are especially reviled and victimized. They are denounced as Oreos, Coconuts, traitors, and collaborationists. In more polite circles, their views are attributed to a Gramscian false consciousness. This is why a great Black intellectual such as Thomas Sowell is ignored and remains largely unknown, whereas dishonest nitwits such as Ibram X. Kendi and Claudine Gay were celebrated and elevated to the highest levels"
&
"Antizionists who respect Jews are just like all those millions of people who respect Italians, while despising pizza, pasta, cappuccino, Verdi, Versace & Sophia Loren."
&
"Antisemitism has changed in one big way: A century ago the most antisemitic nations were those most different from Jews. Nowadays, the opposite is the case."
A person typed online today
"The Jew most likely to be called “difficult” today is often simply the one who refuses to be managed.
He will not shrink his identity to fit someone else’s politics or distance himself from Israel to earn temporary approval from people whose tolerance lasts only as long as Jews remain quiet, grateful, and defenseless.
We do not need permission to care about Israel, defend Jewish self-determination, or reject the demand that Jews prove their moral worth by sacrificing their own safety.
Jewish identity is not something to be diluted until it becomes palatable to fashionable opinion. It carries history, memory, responsibility, and the hard-earned lessons of survival, passed down through generations who refused to disappear, even when that was precisely what the world expected of them.
There is no virtue in apologizing for your existence, and no courage in abandoning your people to win the approval of those who would never demand the same of anyone else.
There is always applause for the Jew who apologizes and distances himself from his own people: the one who condemns Israel before being asked and reassures the room that he is not like the others. He is praised as reasonable and enlightened.
The Jew who says no is treated as the problem. He refuses to bend or trade solidarity for social comfort. He knows that his dignity is worth more than a thousand invitations into rooms where acceptance depends on self-abasement.
So be it.
Our identity is not up for public consultation. Israel is not a bargaining chip, and Jewish self-defense is not a moral embarrassment.
Intimidation, whether dressed up as activism, sophistication, or moral outrage, will not define us, silence us, or dictate our loyalties.
A Jew who refuses to bow is not difficult.
He is free."
Some people typed in reply
"I will never apologize to anyone for what I believe is right and wrong. I do that in a millisecond upon my death…"
"You know what this reminds me of? A relationship between a healthy person and a sadistic, manipulative, narcissistic person with his flying monkeys. The only way to keep your dignity, self-respect, sanity, safety, security, and health is when you set clear boundaries and when you are independent. Worth the freedom."
A person typed online today
"Mamdani is far more accountable as a citizen of Uganda than I am as an American Jew for the actions of the Israeli government.
But far worse, Mamdani openly supported Ugandans who were all about making being gay a capital offense.
He claims he didn’t understand that at the time.
Okay, fine. But how about now?
Israel isn’t the only nation coming to NYC for the UN meeting. Why is he not calling for the arrest of the leader of Uganda for his crimes against humanity, let alone using city resources to “find out” if he can arrest the sitting leader of a foreign nation, even though it was a foregone conclusion?
Watch. He won’t say anything against the leadership of Uganda for their crimes against humanity.
The man is an antisemitic farce. It’s terrifying how many people still haven’t figured this out."
In reply to Another person posting
"The Human Rights Test Mayor Mamdani Cannot Escape: - When New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani publicly described Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as “a war criminal” and “the architect of a horrific genocide against the Palestinian people,” he did far more than voice criticism of a foreign government. From one of the world’s most visible public offices, he presented one of the gravest accusations in international law as settled fact, notwithstanding that allegations of genocide remain fiercely disputed and have not been adjudicated by a competent international court. In doing so, he employed language with profound legal, political, and social consequences, language that carries particular weight in a city home to the largest Jewish population outside Israel.
For the purposes of this discussion, however, I will put aside the incendiary allegations in the Mayor’s choice of words.
Let us assume that a mayor may invoke the language of universal human rights and international justice when speaking about foreign leaders. If that is the standard Mayor Mamdani wishes to embrace, then the public has the right to universality and consistency.
The moment a public official chooses to wield the language of universal justice against one foreign leader, he invites an equally legitimate question:
Will he apply those same principles consistently?
Just days after Mayor Mamdani’s latest denunciation of Israel, a man allegedly shouting “Allahu Akbar” stabbed two people on Manhattan’s Upper West Side, including a visibly Jewish New Yorker. Investigators will determine motive. It would be irresponsible to claim that the Mayor’s remarks caused this horrific attack. And it would be equally irresponsible to pretend that words spoken by political leaders exist in a vacuum."
&
"Public officials shape public discourse. They influence the moral atmosphere of a city. They determine who is portrayed as victim, who is portrayed as villain, and which communities feel increasingly isolated or singled out. In a city home to the largest Jewish population outside Israel, that responsibility carries extraordinary weight.
Because while Mayor Mamdani has shown no hesitation in condemning the government of Israel, there is another government, one to which he has a far closer personal connection, about which his silence has become impossible to ignore.
Uganda.
Mayor Mamdani is a citizen of Uganda.
He has celebrated family milestones there, including his own lavish wedding in July 2025. Not so long ago! He has publicly appeared alongside Rebecca Kadaga, one of the principal architects of Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Act, otherwise known as “The Kill the Gays Bill”. When questions were raised about that appearance, he explained that he had not understood Kadaga’s role. Many accepted that explanation at face value. I did not. My numerous articles speak to that – if you would like to take a peek.
But today there is no ambiguity. He now knows.
He knows that Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Act imposes life imprisonment and, in certain circumstances, the death penalty for consensual same-sex relationships. He knows it has fueled violence, arbitrary arrests, blackmail, forced displacement, family rejection, and exile with dangerous pathways, causing loss of life. He knows that thousands of LGBTQI Ugandans have fled their homes seeking refuge from a law that has become synonymous with state-sanctioned persecution. He knows a good number of these asylees and refugees are now in New York City.
For more than fifteen years, I have documented these abuses. As Executive Director of the African Human Rights Coalition, I have worked directly with LGBTQ Ugandans forced to flee their country. I have authored expert reports for courts across the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Europe. I have witnessed this crisis unfold not through headlines or political debate, but through the lived experiences of survivors.
As I write these words, hundreds remain in hiding—living in constant fear, hunted because of who they are, reminiscent of the hidden lives Anne Frank so tragically came to symbolize. Many struggle simply to find food, secure shelter, and escape to safety. Others remain stranded in neighboring African countries that refuse to recognize their refugee claims because those governments, too, criminalize homosexuality and view them not as refugees, but as criminals."
&
"When President Yoweri Museveni signed Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Act into law in 2023, he called upon African leaders to “save the world from homosexuality.” Many have answered that call through similar legislation or increasingly hostile policies. The impact of Uganda’s campaign against LGBTQ people has extended far beyond its borders, helping fuel one of the most significant human rights crises facing LGBTQ Africans today.
I have also publicly called upon Mayor Mamdani to condemn Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Act and to call for its repeal. He has remained silent.
That silence is no longer merely disappointing; it is deeply troubling. When a public official so readily invokes the language of international justice to condemn one foreign leader, yet refuses to speak against one of the world’s most notorious campaigns of state-sponsored persecution carried out by the government of the country of which he is a citizen, the silence inevitably raises difficult questions. It projects a selective moral outrage that risks appearing as indifference toward the suffering of LGBTQ Ugandans.
Nor is this solely about the persecution of LGBTQ people. Uganda’s broader human rights record has long been condemned for the suppression of political opposition, arbitrary detention, torture, restrictions on freedom of expression and assembly, and other serious abuses. These are not allegations confined to advocacy organizations; they have been documented repeatedly by governments, including the United States, and by international human rights bodies. Yet Mayor Mamdani has remained publicly silent about this broader pattern of repression as well.
Uganda’s persecution of LGBTQ people is not an abstract geopolitical dispute unfolding thousands of miles away. It is one of the most severe and enduring human rights crises in the world today. It is also a crisis directly connected to the country of which Mayor Mamdani remains a citizen.
If there is one foreign government over which Mayor Mamdani possesses unique moral credibility, and, arguably, a unique moral responsibility, it is not Israel.
It is Uganda.
Yet while he readily labels Israel’s leaders as international criminals, he has not summoned that same moral clarity for President Yoweri Museveni’s government.
Where is the condemnation of a regime that has criminalized love?
Where is the demand that Uganda repeal the Anti-Homosexuality Act?
Where is the outrage over the imprisonment, torture, disappearances, and persecution that continue under Museveni’s rule?
Where is the solidarity with the thousands of LGBTQ refugees scattered across Africa because returning home could cost them their freedom, or their lives?
These are not rhetorical questions. And they reside in the context of Mamdani claiming love and support for THE GAYS in new York City through a myriad of measures. That does not alter or cure his silence – rather it exacerbates it!
These questions go to the heart of whether human rights are truly universal, or merely political.
Soon, representatives of President Museveni’s government will once again arrive in New York for the United Nations General Assembly. Mayor Mamdani has argued that New York should not provide impunity to foreign leaders accused of grave human rights abuses. If that principle is genuine, then surely it cannot stop at Israel’s borders.
Will he publicly condemn Museveni’s government? Will he call for repeal of Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Act? Will he stand with the LGBTQI Ugandans forced into exile by policies enacted by officials whose government he has never publicly challenged?"
&
"Or does his commitment to international justice extend only to governments that fit a particular political narrative or serve an agenda that is becoming increasingly more obvious?
This is not a demand that Mayor Mamdani change his views on Israel – we know that is a fruitless endeavor. We know he thinks Israel should not exist as the home of the Jewish people. It is a demand that he apply the same moral standards everywhere. Universal human rights cannot survive selective outrage.
When political leaders elevate one set of victims while ignoring another, they transform human rights from universal principles into ideological instruments. The victims become secondary to the politics. To me , that is insidious and the opposite of justice. When we witness such selectivity, we are of right to invoke motive, and to tout it as fact, beyond assumption!
Mayor Mamdani often speaks of creating a city where every community feels safe and valued. I believe that aspiration should include Jewish New Yorkers, LGBTQI Ugandans, political prisoners, and every victim of state persecution, without regard to whether their suffering advances a preferred political cause.
The true measure of human rights advocacy is not how passionately one condemns distant governments. It is whether one possesses the moral courage to confront injustice even when it is politically inconvenient, financially inconvenient, and especially when it is committed by one’s own country of citizenship.
So now that Mayor Mamdani has flagrantly shown us that he is willing to judge foreign leaders through the lens of international human rights, it is time to ask him to do the same with Uganda.
Until he does, his vision of universal justice will remain incomplete, not because he spoke about Israel, but because he chose silence where his own voice could matter most. Until he applies the same standards to Uganda, his selective outrage can only deepen suspicion that his invocation of human rights serves less as a universal principle than as a vehicle for a singular political campaign against Israel.
Author’s Note:
If this selective application of human rights concerns you, I invite you to add your voice to ours by signing my public petition calling upon Mayor Zohran Mamdani to unequivocally condemn Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Act and publicly call for its repeal, while also addressing the broader human rights abuses committed under President Yoweri Museveni’s government.
The petition began during Mayor Mamdani’s campaign and has now garnered more than 6,500 signatures. In the coming week, it will be formally delivered to Mayor Mamdani at New York City Hall. His press office has already been notified of our concerns and given the opportunity to respond. To date, we have received no response.
Silence is a choice. If you believe that human rights should be defended consistently, regardless of politics, geography, or ideology, I hope you will stand with us."
jewishjournal.com has an article
"What Will It Take?"
by
Thane Rosenbaum
July 26, 2026
The stupid Evil Ugly Retarded
"actor" Mark Ruffalo is discussed in this article
Mark Ruffalo is definitely a Monster
A two-legged cockroach
When Ruffalo ultimately passes away
He will Suffer
Eternal Conscious Torment
Eternal Damnation in Hell &
The Lake of Fire for the
Hideous Unforgivable
SIN of Anti-Semitism
Jew-hatred, Anti-Israel Hatred
Ruffalo and all others like him are
Forever Doomed the instant they
Ultimately pass away ,
Ruffalo never had any talent
a dog turd left on a sidewalk has more intelligence and talent than Ruffalo
In Fact many decent people have more love and respect for a dog turd on a sidewalk than we do for Ruffalo , a dog turd can be used as fertilizer
unlike the two-legged POS Ruffalo who is completely useless and worthless
If only Ruffalo had been an Abortion
If only ,
Since Ruffalo was sadly born
If only Ruffalo had been a SIDS baby
Wikipedia says about SIDS
"Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), sometimes known as cot death or crib death, is the sudden, unexplained death of a child of less than one year of age. "
Boycott Ruffalo and all other
Degenerate Filth like him
Get them banned from Hollywood
Mark Ruffalo can take his
Gentile Privilege and shove it up his ass
If only he was a SIDS baby , that would have been so Fucking cool , a Blessing ,
a Blessing that would bring
Glory to God !!!
God Hates Anti-Semitism
The Jerusalem Post jpost.com has an article
"Beyond outrage: Building communities that can fight antisemitism"
By AARON HERMAN
JULY 27, 2026
combatantisemitism.org has an article
"Op-Ed: If Pride Is For Everyone, It Can’t Exclude Jews"
July 27, 2026
allisraelnews.com has an article
"Father of murdered Israeli diplomat Yaron Lischinsky urges Jews & Christians to fight ‘monster of antisemitism’ "
by
All Israel News Staff
Published: July 24, 2026
jns.org has an article
"America’s upper-middle class antisemitism"
by
Benjamin Kerstein
July 27, 2026
Also from the Jerusalem Post
jpost.com has an article
"What I carried home from the Haifa conference on antisemitism"
By MALKA SHAW
JULY 27, 2026
jns.org has an article
"The most dangerous antisemitism is the kind Jews believe"
by
Raphael Shore
July 27, 2026
torontosun.com has an article
"KINSELLA: Toronto is the worst place for antisemitic hate crime"
by
Warren Kinsella
Published Jul 27, 2026
freebeacon.com has an article
"Ruth Was Right"
by
Tal Fortgang
July 26, 2026
Post a Comment