The Miracle of Zionism

"Israel is the only nation in the world that is governing itself in the same territory, under the same name, and with the same religion and same language as it did 3,000 years ago." - Historian Barbara Tuchman

"Israel is the only nation on the face of the earth that was created by a sovereign act of God" - Pastor John Hagee

"All things are mortal but the Jew; all other forces pass, but he remains. What is the secret of his immortality?" - Author / Atheist, Mark Twain (long before the Holocaust and Israeli-Jewish statehood)

"They are the most glorious nation that ever inhabited this Earth. The Romans and their Empire were but a Bauble in comparison of the Jews. They have given religion to three quarters of the Globe and have influenced the affairs of Mankind more, and more happily, than any other Nation ancient or modern." - President John Adams - His 1808 response letter criticizing the depiction of Jews by the French Enlightenment philosopher Voltaire.

Saturday, August 11, 2007

Letter to Hank Hanegraaff

CRI International
P.O. Box 8500
Charlotte, NC 28271-8500

Mr. Hanegraaff,
What is it with you Replacement Theologists? Are the Jews that are living in Israel, and most especially Jerusalem threatening your “replacement-doctrine”? Have they so much threatened your doctrine that you have resorted to favoring and even spiritually supporting the Hamas-electing (Nazi) Palestinians when it comes to the status of Jerusalem? To me, such favoritism for such an anti-Semite, devil-possessed people, can only come from a anti-Semite source itself! Your doctrine speaks louder than any formal denial of anti-Semitism Mr. Hanegraaff.

Your hypocrisy as a Christian over the status of Jerusalem is quite overwhelming when one considers the fact that the Palestinians are the keepers of the Muslim shrine that now sits upon Solomon’s temple mount bearing Koranic verses in Arabic, proclaiming to all Christendom that God has no son and that the sonship of Jesus and the Trinity are false, while the Israeli Jews are allowing a huge multi-million dollar Christian Heritage Center to be built within their Jewish country. This is something that would never occur in any Muslim country, and it most certainly would never happen in your sought after Palestinian state. Based upon your replacement-doctrine, you had rather see the terrorist Palestinians rule Jerusalem (who jumped for joy at the news of 9/11) than to see God fulfill His convent to the Jews!

On August 3rd. of this year I heard you instruct a caller named Martha that Jesus was now the "land of Israel" thereby causing the Jews to no longer have any biblical ties to the land or most importantly, over Jerusalem. You even went as far as using Joshua 21:43 as your proof-text to back up your Israel-is-only-history claim. Are you really that naïve towards the Jewish scriptures Mr. Hanegraaff, or do you simply hate God’s eternal covenant with the Jewish people?

O seed of Abraham His servant, You children of Jacob, His chosen ones! He is YHVH our God; His judgments are in all the earth. He remembers His covenant forever, The word which He commanded, for a thousand generations, The covenant which He made with Abraham, And His oath to Isaac, and confirmed it to Jacob for a statute, To Israel as an everlasting covenant, Saying, "To you I will give the land of Canaan As the allotment of your inheritance," - Psalms 105:6-11

Thus says YHVH, Who gives the sun for a light by day, The ordinances of the moon and the stars for a light by night, Who disturbs the sea, And its waves roar (YHVH of hosts is His name): "If those ordinances depart From before Me, says YHVH, Then the seed of Israel shall also cease From being a nation before Me forever." Thus says YHVH: "If heaven above can be measured, And the foundations of the earth searched out beneath, I will also cast off all the seed of Israel For all that they have done, says YHVH. - Jeremiah 31: 35-37

Did you notice the words, "for all that they have done" in that last verse? That means the same ones that did the sinning to begin with is who this promise is to, and not some future sinful "spiritual Israel" that consist of gentiles!
.
Let me ask you Mr. Hanegraaff, which of the two nations did you come out of when you became a believer in Christ? What, you don’t understand this question? It is a trick question. However, since you insist on spiritualizing and replacing all of the physical promises to Israel as promises to the Church, the question shouldn’t be too difficult for you to answer for a Bible reader and Bible answer person like yourself, that is if you can bring yourself to account for all the holy printed words of Ezekiel 37:21-28. This holy text from the prophet Ezekiel just so happens to be written long after your proof text of Joshua 21:43 or any other proof text you might wish to use such as Joshua 21:43-45, 1 Kings 4:21, 1 Kings 8:56, 2 Chronicles 9:26, and Nehemiah 9:7-8, 24.

The prophecies contained within the book of Ezekiel that pertain to the physical Jewish nation are prophesied not only for a later time than those scriptures that you might try to use to show no further prophecy for Israel, but are to be fulfilled only during the messianic age to come, that never ends! That, my Replacement Theologist, rules out (without a doubt) the prophecies in Ezekiel being fulfilled during the Babylonian return!

The question for Replacement Theologist like yourself and your spiritual partner Colin Chapman is whether the subject of Ezekiel 37:21-28 is spiritual, physical, are both? If Ezekiel 37:21-28 has even the smallest element of relating to anything physical, then it would be quite ignorant on your part not to be a pro-active Christian Zionist. If your claim is that Ezekiel 37:21-28 only consist in a spiritual form for the believer in Christ, then my question again is: From which of the two nations (Israel or Judah) did you come out of, to be joined into one stick (as a believer) whereby you will never be part of one of two nations anymore? Isn't that what the Word of God text directly states? Therefore, I would like to know the answer to that question based upon the word of God, that in your mind has switched from being totally physical (pertaining to Israel) to totally spiritual (pertaining to you, the believer).

A more to the point question is: Can you honestly read Ezekiel 37:21-28 that was written by exiled Hebrew prophet, in the Hebrew language, for the exiled Hebrew people to read, and still claim that the promises that are contained therein have nothing whatsoever to do with the physical exiled Hebrew people? Can you honestly do that Mr. Henegraaff without even a pause of thought that what you are doing by injecting such a replacement-doctrine into a given context of scripture is indeed altering the meaning of God's holy words from their original context of the anointed Hebrew Prophet Ezekiel while willfully disregarding God's direct promises to His chosen people that is contained within the anointed heaven-breathed text?

.
Allow me to dissect Ezekiel 37:21-28 verse by verse for you from just what is written therein and how it relates to physical Israel’s history. As I do this, it will become very evident that by trying to paint a “spiritual-only” scene from such a clear text is to make the Hebrew prophet Ezekiel a lair and a false prophet to his Hebrew people to whom he wrote and preached to in his day, and for Hebrew generations that were to follow.

V. 21 And say unto them, Thus saith YHVH GOD; Behold, I will take the children of Israel from among the heathen, whither they be gone, and will gather them on every side, and bring them into their own land:
From the first four words on this verse it is evident that God has commanded Ezekiel to say something to someone but just who is that someone he is to speak to? To answer that question we need only to go up three verses to verse 18 where God tells Ezekiel “And when the children of thy people shall speak unto thee, saying, Wilt thou not shew us what thou meanest by these? Say unto them.. Therefore, it is clear that Ezekiel’s message is directed at “the children of his people So we must then ask ourselves: “Are these “children of his people” whom he spoke to, spiritual or physical Israel?” The answer to this question really lays the whole foundation as to whether or not the entire following context of prophecy should be applied to physical Israel (the children of Ezekiel's people) or some "spiritual Israel" that would included people from every nation that are not children of Ezekiel's people.
.
Since the physical children of Israel, (including Ezekiel himself) was placed into exile “among the heathen” when Ezekiel wrote this verse, (21) does this verse have anything at all to do with physical Israel being gathered? Can one "connect the dots" (as in 2 plus 2 equals 4) and plainly see that Ezekiel wanted the children of his present exiled people to know that a "gathering" for a return to the land from where they were presently exiled from would in their physical future? Isn't that a real simple Bible question?

And what is this “into their own land” business doing in this verse? Was God referring to the land of Canaan as belonging to physical Israel as He was saying “into their own land” to His prophet Ezekiel? Wasn’t God concerned about the Palestinians and their claim to the land as you and your good
spiritual buddy Colin Chapman are? In other words, Mr. Hanegraaff, is it possible to obtain from this one verse (21) that the God who made the statement “in their own land” was in fact decreeing that the land of Canaan belongs to the same ones who are gathered from the heathens (in the text) and not some squatting, Jew-hating Palestinians who, by the way, claim that they are now God’s chosen “replacement” people, according to sura 3:110 of their Koran? I mean, isn't that amazing how you and the Palestinians that you support claim to be the "replacement people"? You use your New Testament and your terrorist so-called Palestinians use their Koran for the same Jew Chosen People denial doctrine and goal!

V.22 And I will make them one nation in the land upon the mountains of Israel; and one king shall be king to them all: and they shall be no more two nations, neither shall they be divided into two kingdoms any more at all:
Why doesn’t this verse it say “ the land upon the mountains of Palestine”? Since physical Israel’s history contains an ancient past from the time this verse was written of having two kingdoms, each one having their own king, is there any chance at all that this verse is talking about physical Israel? Any chance at all? Remember your claim of total spiritual Israel when answering this question. You cannot pick and choose physical and spiritual when you wish and still attempt to stay credible even in your own mind. If one part of these verses in the context of Ezekiel 37:21-28 is physical Israel, then the entire context is then physical Israel!

V.23 Neither shall they defile themselves any more with their idols, nor with their detestable things, nor with any of their transgressions: but I will save them out of all their dwelling places, wherein they have sinned, and will cleanse them: so shall they be My people, and I will be their God.
In following the context of the prior verses, it becomes very clear to see that the subjects (they, their, and them) are the same physical Israel that are gathered "into 'their' own land" in verses 21 and 22. Therefore, is it too far of a stretch to conclude that the Hebrew prophet Ezekiel was prophesying that his people “physical Israel” (verse 18) that will be cleansed (as a people still under a forever-covenant) from their sins as a physical nation, while being in their own physical land and pleasing their God?

This would be a good place to stop and reflect, and to make sure that I haven’t
missed some “spiritual-Israel” meaning here that the prophet Ezekiel was meaning to convey to whomever read his written words of this text? Nope, I don’t see anything yet, so let me continue.

V.24 And David my servant shall be king over them; and they all shall have one shepherd: they shall also walk in my judgments, and observe my statutes, and do them.
Since the subjects (them / they) haven’t changed in the context but continues from verses 21 and 22, I don’t think that I’m going out on a limb to say that David (referring to a physical Jew) will be over “physical” Israel. Also, in following the context from verse 21, we can see that the same ones who are gathered "into their 'own' land" will be "gathered" into their own land at the time of this Davidic messiah.

That's right, no prophecy being fulfilled during the Babylonial return here! Physical history, as well as New Testament scriptures show that there was no great in-gathering of physical Israel “from among the heathen” and "into their own land" during the time that Jesus was upon the earth (see St. John 7:35, Acts 24:5). Neither did physical Israel have a Davidic messiah to rule over them as a prince “forever” (see verse 25) when only 5% of the Babylonian exiles returned to the land, as you Replacement Theologists love to claim when cornered.

There certainly would not be such a thing called the “Babylonian Talmud” today if the majority of physical Israel would have returned according to greatness of this "return" promise that Ezekiel is conveying in this text.
Therefore, call me a Zionist if you must, (and you must) but seemingly this verse leaves us with only one way to interpret its prophecy, by which one must say, "future physical tense"!

V.25 And they shall dwell in the land that I have given unto Jacob my servant, wherein your fathers have dwelt; and they shall dwell therein, even they, and their children, and their children's children for ever: and My servant David shall be their prince for ever.
Is the land that is being described in this verse, as the land that God gave Jacob (Israel) physical or spiritual? In other words, can one find this very land that God gave Jacob and that Ezekiel is referring to in this text on a physical (non-spiritual) map? Who is it that is being referred to in this verse when the prophet Ezekiel uses the word “your” as he uses the term “your fathers”?

Again, I want to make sure I’m not missing anything with a “spiritual-Israel-only” element here in regarding this holy prophecy. Ezekiel, being the Hebrew prophet that he was, wouldn’t he be directing his statement towards his own physical Hebrew people (in correlation with verse 18)? Again, this is a very simple Bible question. Is there any chance at all, and by any stretch of the
imagination that Ezekiel might have been talking to the Palestinians and about their Palestinian fathers who have dwelt in the land, or maybe some spiritual believers in Jesus whose spiritual fathers dwelt in some spiritual land? Come on now, let's not avoid that question but answer it head-on and directly. Here's the question again Mr. Bible Answer Man:

Q. Is the anointed Hebrew prophet Ezekiel talking about future Arab-based so-called Palestinians or Spiritual Israel Gentile Christians when he writes he holy inspired script-text: "And they shall dwell in the land that I have given unto Jacob my servant, wherein your fathers have dwelt; and they shall dwell therein, even they, and their children, and their children's children for ever"?
.
Let me ask it in the form of a multiple choice question just so we can be really clear on this. In staying with the flow of the context from verse 21, are the children from the ones who are gathered from among the heathen into their own physical land that God gave Jacob (v.25), of whom is Ezekiel most directing his statements towards in this prophecy text:
A. The future Gentile spiritual followers of Jesus.
B. The Palestinians (to whom the Quartet wants a state within the land mentioned).
C. The physical seed of Jacob and their physical generations.

The same question applies to the children’s children as well (meaning for all future generations of these gathered ones)? It should be plain to you Mr. Hanegraaff, that since the land that God gave Jacob, where the ancient Jewish “fathers dwelt” is undeniably very physical, and that no Christian doctrine has ever claimed that based upon this prophecy in Ezekiel, that all Christendom should be gathered from among the heathen into the physical land God gave to Jacob, nor has all of Christendom ever done so since the Christian era began. Furthermore, I don’t recall seeing any Palestinians in the movie “The Passion” did you? I wonder why not? Maybe the replacement-theology believing, anti-Semitic, Mel Gibson forgot to put them in his movie?

V.26 Moreover I will make a covenant of peace with them; it shall be an everlasting covenant with them: and I will place them, and multiply them, and will set my sanctuary in the midst of them for evermore.
Again, in following the context from verses 21 and 22, the “them” can only be physical Israel, who will be multiplied with a forever sanctuary in their midst. And since it’s a physical Israel who is gathered from the physical heathens into their own physical land, where their physical fathers dwelt, in the same physical land that God gave physical Jacob, where their physical children and physical children’s children will be forever, then there is no reason to think that there won’t be a physical sanctuary in their physical midst forever. Especially since there is a physical temple described in great detail by the same prophet Ezekiel (who served as a priest in the old physical temple) starting just three chapters later in chapters 40-48.

That’s right, as a Christian Mr. Henegraaff, you should be grateful that the physical temple that is promised to be among physical Israel in the near future will cause
the Muslim shrine that is devoted to the terrorist-god Allah, and that bears the Koranic verse of sura 17:111 declaring “God has No Son” will have to go by-by! Doesn’t that make you put on a big Christian smile on your replacement-theology face?

V.27 My tabernacle also shall be with them: yea, I will be their God, and they shall be my people.
The phrase, “I will be their God, and they shall be my people” concerning the physical nation of Israel is repeated several times by the prophets Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Zechariah (see Jer. 7:22,23, Jer. 11:4, Jer. 24:5-7, Jer. 30: 18-22, *Jer. 31:1,33,* Jer. 32:37,38, Ezk.11:20, Ezk. 14:11, Ezk. 36:28, Zech. 8:8) and their is absolutely no reason to think that the meaning of this phrase is any different in this prophecy of Ezekiel 37 than of all the times spoken.

One thing that all these scriptures containing this phrase have in common is the fact that the phrase is always used in the context of physical Israel returning to the physical land of their forefathers! The prophet Ezekiel while directing his message to an exiled nation, expresses this God-spoken phrase three times in chapter 37 alone and once in the prior chapter. From the whole of the Hebrew scriptures, there should be no need to explain to whom God continually throughout calls “His people”. Neither should there be any effort to spiritualize God’s word away from its original meaning by injecting some supposedly hidden-spiritual meaning into these holy words that are so clearly written “in your Gentile face” each time you read it!


V. 28 And the heathen shall know that I YHVH do sanctify Israel, when my sanctuary shall be in the midst of them for evermore.
Who is the “heathen” and who is the “Israel” and the “them” in this verse? If we follow the context from verses 21 and 22 all the way through to verse 28, it becomes quite easy to see that the “Israel” and the “them” are none other than physical Israel, the seed of Jacob to whom God gave the land to, as He gathers them from among the heathens "into their own land" "where their fathers had once dwelt", and where their children, and where their children‘s children will please and obey God under the prince Davidic messiah forever.

I don’t think I just said anything in the last sentence that might be considered injecting something into this prophecy that might be adding or taking something away from the original context and the intent of the prophet Ezekiel as he wrote down this holy scripture. Can you say that when reading this holy text of Ezekiel 37:21-28 Mr. Hanegraaff? Knowing that a word is a thought expressed, does your spiritual-Israel doctrine fit perfectly into the mindset of the prophet Ezekiel as he was expressing his thoughts from God in word form that we now see as this holy text?

In other words, If someone were to ask Ezekiel immediately after he finished writing this text about the concept of replacing physical Israel that he was apart of, with a spiritual (goyim populated) Israel, would he inform you that indeed that was the his main theme of why he wrote the inspired text, or would he curse you for being so spiritually and willfully stupid against God revealed plan for His chosen people?

.
Continuing on, who is the heathen” that is mentioned in this verse 28? Is this verse talking about you Mr. Henegraaff? Are you the Replacement-Theologist heathen along with others like you that will know at the time when this prophecy is being fulfilled that God does sanctify Israel (something you now deny, which is exactly what the verse implies that the heathen will do up until the time this promise is fulfilled)?

However, on the other hand, if you are the “spiritual Israel” that you claim you are, and this scripture reading from Ezekiel 37 is the new way to correctly read this text, and therefore I’m the non-believing heathen in this verse; then Ezekiel would have to had lied, because the prophecy stated that the heathen will know (meaning without any doubt whatsoever) that Israel (be it you or the Jewish people) is sanctified by their God.

All that I have to do is read this prophecy in its original context without any deviation, while knowing who wrote it, who it was written to, and the background as to why it was written, and I will have obtained enough of information and reason to doubt that God has sanctified you as spiritual Israel, (according to the very wording of the text) and by a simple reading of the text can verify that your “spiritual-Israel” and replacement-theology didn't come from the same God that inspire Ezekiel to write what he wrote and in the context that he wrote it in!
How about that?
.
However, if physical Israel, (the ones that have re-entered the land of Canaan after two thousand years, and have established Jerusalem as their sovereign capital, while being the only ones to do so since the time of King David) are in anyway connected to this Ezekiel prophecy, then you Mr. Answer Man, are in-line for a rude spiritual awakening that will cause you to have to give another type of an answer, an answer according to the scripture that assures that heathens like yourself will definitely know the truth about Israel and the God who sanctifies her.

Knowing your status as the heathen, it is no wonder why you side with the Hamas-electing (Nazi) Palestinians over the status of Jerusalem even while knowing that they are in indeed Hamas-electing religious-Nazis! Then you have the audacity to vilify the physical nation of Israel as you try and take from her, her personal prophecy in order to magnify your own man-made “spiritual” doctrine! I’ll end this letter with another "physical Israel" scripture that is very comparable to the Ezekiel 28:21-28 scripture, and which should be considered in light of this prophecy.


And what one nation in the earth is like thy people, even like Israel, whom God went to redeem for a people to himself, and to make him a name, and to do for you great things and terrible, for thy land, before thy people, which thou redeemedst to thee from Egypt, from the nations and their gods? For thou hast confirmed to thyself thy people Israel to be a people unto thee for ever: and thou, YHVH, art become their God. - II Samuel 7:23,24

Wishing you a pro-Israel / pro-Zionist day,
- Joe Whitehead

PS. I'm sorry, but I won't be donating to your ministry anytime in the near or distant future.

222 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 222 of 222
Anonymous said...

blogs.timesofisrael.com has an article
by
Destiny Joy Lugo
"The Deception of Replacement Theology"
April 1, 2026

washingtontimes.com has an article
"Wrong, Tucker, evangelicals have not turned against Israel"
By Motti Inbari and Kirill Bumin
Wednesday, April 1, 2026

Tucker Carlson is a Clown and
Pathological Liar

Fuck You Tucker
Fuck You Tucker
Fuck You Tucker
Fuck You Tucker
Fuck You Tucker
Fuck You Tucker

Anonymous said...

camera.org has an article
"The Daily Wire’s Matt Fradd Distorts Christian Zionism and Catholic Teaching on Israel"
By: David Orenstein, PhD
April 10, 2026

Anonymous said...

A Gentile Christian typed online today his opinion
"Is the modern state of Israel the true chosen people of God?
Let me be clear from the start: I’m not antisemitic, nor do I believe in replacement theology. I fully affirm the deep and significant role Israel played in God’s redemptive story — and continues to play in His plans. I also do not deny that the modern state of Israel is indeed descended from the Old Testament nation of Israel, ethnically and historically. That connection is real and meaningful.

However, it’s important to recognize that Israel’s modern return to the land is not a fulfillment of prophecy apart from Christ, but an act of God's divine mercy — not because of their righteousness or spiritual merit, but so that they might be brought to repentance and come to believe in the true Messiah, Jesus Christ. God, in His sovereign grace, may be positioning them once again in the land of their fathers to prepare hearts for the gospel, not to validate a nationalistic or merely ethnic claim to divine favor.

I hold to what’s often called fulfillment theology — the view that Jesus Christ is the fulfillment of all the promises and prophecies of the Old Covenant, not the replacement of them. He didn't set aside what God had spoken through the Law and the Prophets — He brought it all to completion.

After Christ's death and resurrection, the focus of God's redemptive work shifted from one ethnic group or nation to a global body of believers — men and women from every tribe, tongue, and nation who have turned from their sin and placed their faith in Jesus. This diverse, Spirit-born people are what the New Testament calls the Church — the Ekklēsia — God’s chosen people, His holy nation, His royal priesthood (1 Peter 2:9–10).

The true Israel of God is not a matter of physical descent or outward religion, but of inward transformation — those circumcised in heart by the Spirit, not merely by the letter of the law. As Paul writes in Romans 2:9, “There will be tribulation and distress for every human being who does evil, the Jew first and also the Greek,” and continues in verses 28–29: “For no one is a Jew who is merely one outwardly, nor is circumcision outward and physical. But a Jew is one inwardly, and circumcision is a matter of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter.” This applies to all who are in Christ, whether Jew or Gentile.

And as Paul argues in Romans 9, not all who are descended from Israel belong to the Israel of God. God's chosen people have always been a remnant — those who are justified by faith, like Abraham, to whom righteousness was credited because of his belief. God's promises have never been about ethnic lineage alone, but about faith and covenant relationship with Him."

Anonymous said...

The comment continues
"In Ephesians 2, Paul powerfully describes how the dividing wall of hostility between Jew and Gentile has been torn down through the cross of Christ. He writes:

> “For He Himself is our peace, who made both groups into one and broke down the barrier of the dividing wall... so that in Himself He might make the two into one new man, thus establishing peace.” (Ephesians 2:14–15)

In Christ, there’s no longer a distinction between Jew and Gentile — we are one new humanity. As Galatians says:

> “There is neither Jew nor Greek... for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Galatians 3:28–29)

This means it’s no longer about one nation, one land, or one physical temple. The Church — the people of God — are now His temple. We are being built together into a dwelling place for God by the Spirit (Ephesians 2:21–22). God’s presence no longer resides in a building made with hands, but in the hearts of His people, scattered throughout the world.

And because this gospel is for all people, our prayers and our mission shouldn’t be focused on just one group — not only for Israel, but for all nations. Yes, we should pray for the Jewish people — that their eyes would be opened to their Messiah — but we must equally pray for every nation and people group to come to saving faith in Christ. No ethnicity has a privileged path to salvation.

There is one gospel, one Savior, and one way of salvation: repentance from sin and faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. As Peter declared in Acts 4:12, “There is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.”

When the Jewish nation rejected Jesus as Messiah, they weren’t just turning away from Him — they were also rejecting the Law, the Prophets, Moses, and Abraham — all of whom pointed to Christ. Jesus said it plainly in John 5:46: “If you believed Moses, you would believe Me, for he wrote about Me.”

And to the religious leaders who refused to believe, Jesus said in John 8:44:

> “You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father’s desires.”

These are strong words, not based on ethnicity but on spiritual condition — a refusal to believe the truth when it stood before them.

Still, I agree with Paul in Romans 11 — God is not finished with Israel. There remains a partial hardening, but also a future hope. I believe that in God’s sovereign timing, events yet to come will lead many within Israel to repentance and faith in Jesus. And perhaps even now, God has shown mercy by returning them to the land — not as an end in itself, but as part of His gracious invitation to return to Him through the gospel. Their salvation, like ours, will only come through the cross — not heritage, not the law, not a nation, and not a temple.

So in Christ, we are all invited into the promises of God — not by bloodline, but by the blood of the Lamb."

We don't agree completely with what this person said , his interpretation of
Romans 2:28-29 , Romans 9
& 1 Peter 2: 9-10

Still he made some good points

Anonymous said...

chick.com has an article
"Supporting Israel, Standing on Scripture"
By David W. Daniels
April/May 2026

Also from chick.com an article
"God Still Fights For Israel"
July/August 2018

israeltoday.co.il has an article
"Seven Scriptures That Make Supersessionists Squirm"
by Dan Juster
Jan 16, 2023

See Also the Bible verses
Ezra 3:11 & Obadiah verse 15

Anonymous said...

YouTube has a video
"The Truth About the Jews & Tucker Carlson |
Jonathan Cahn Prophetic"
August 19, 2025
by
Jonathan Cahn Official

The video is 33 minutes and 25 seconds long
33:25 good video


Don't be a Sucker
Boycott Tucker
Boycott Tucker, Candace Owens and all other
Worthless Loser hatemongers

Anonymous said...

firstthings.com had an article
"SINGLING OUT ISRAEL ISN’T CHRISTIAN"
Oct 26, 2010
by William Doino Jr.
This article says:

"Several days ago, an article from the Associated Press appeared, with the provocative headline, “Vatican Meeting of Mideast Bishops Demands Israel End Occupation of Palestinian Lands.” Concerned that headline might be a little-one-sided, I read on, only to find this:

In a final joint communiqué, the bishops also told Israel it shouldn’t use the Bible to justify ‘injustices’ against the Palestinians . . . . While the bishops condemned terrorism and anti-Semitism, they laid much of the blame for the conflict squarely on Israel. They listed the ‘occupation’ of Palestinian lands, Israel’s separation barrier with the West Bank, its military checkpoints, political prisoners, demolition of homes and disturbance of Palestinians’ socio-economic lives as factors that have made life increasingly difficult for Palestinians.
Still alarmed, and unsatisfied, I read the Synod’s full statement but, alas, the AP story accurately summarized it. Although there are many fine Christian affirmations in it, the statement is damaged by an undue animus against Israel. No other country comes in for the kind of blame dished out against its policies. The bishops raise concerns about Iraq and Lebanon, but only in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian dispute, for which, they suggest, Israel bears almost sole responsibility.

Like many who proclaim the need for peace, the bishops naively believe that once the Palestinians have a homeland, Israel “will be able to enjoy peace and security” too, and many other conflicts in the region will disappear. In part, the statement reads like a utopian projection”its boundless faith in the United Nations being just one example. The statement does condemn fanaticism and intolerance, but in a generalized, politically-correct way:

We condemn violence and terrorism from wherever it may proceed as well as all religious extremism. We condemn all forms of racism, anti-Semitism, anti-Christianism and Islamophobia and we call upon the religions to assume their responsibility to promote dialogue between cultures and civilizations in our region and in the entire world.
Note that these condemnations do not specify exactly who might be guilty of these evils, and to what degree. Note also the moral equivalence. Is “Islamophobia,” for example, anywhere near as dangerous or intense as anti-Semitism, not to mention anti-Christianism, in the Middle East, and “the entire world”?

And if Israel should be criticized by name, for its failures and abuses, why not countries with far more horrendous records, like Iran and Syria? Why not organizations like the PLO and Hezbollah?

And have the bishops forgotten about al Qaeda? In a recent commentary on al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, Thomas Joscelyn noted that “the ideology that fuels al Qaeda’s hate . . . relies on a paranoid and delusional view of the world in which an imaginary ‘Zionist-Crusader’ conspiracy seeks to impose its will on Muslims.” In this, he continues, “al Qaeda’s paranoia is not all that different from the insanity of Nazism or the anti-capitalist ranting of Communists. In each case, the ideologues pretend that a dastardly cabal threatens humanity and they are the last hope for redemption.”

Anonymous said...

the article continues
"Are the bishops aware of just how entrenched this poisonous world view is among Israel’s opponents (and actually part of indoctrination programs for the young); and if so, why were they not more explicit in describing and condemning it, and assigning specific blame to those who promote it?

If it is argued that the bishops, representing an endangered Christian minority in the Middle East, have to be very careful about what they say against extremist governments and movements, lest more Christians become targets themselves, fair enough. But isn’t the reverse also true: don’t the bishops need to be extremely careful about what they say about Israel, lest more Jews become targets?

Israel’s deadly enemies will surely exploit the Synod’s final declaration, using it as a propaganda weapon, giving it the widest possible publicity”which is not to say that’s what the bishops intended, at all. On the contrary, and to their credit, they cited Vatican II’s Nostra aetate , on the non-Christian religions, stressing Christianity’s bond with Judaism, and its abhorrence of religious prejudice. But the bishops should realize the power of words, and unintended consequences, especially in that part of the world.

It is right and proper for the Middle East’s bishops to stand on the side of those who are suffering”often desperately so”and it is natural that they would be particularly anxious about the quality of life for Christians in the Middle East. The Catholic Church is right not to be uncritical of everything Israel does in the name of security, any more than it should be about America’s war on terror.

But fair’s fair. Why has Israel applied some (admittedly debatable) security measures? Because Israelis have been under attack”fierce and fanatical attack”for years and years and years. Do the bishops have a better strategy which can guarantee peace and security for all, and if so, what is it? The Synod’s final declaration addresses these concerns only sparingly, and with idealistic platitudes”not with anything approaching a healthy Christian realism.

Ironically, the very fact the bishops are making these “bold” statements is a testament to Israel’s essential decency and humanity”the bishops know there will be no serious consequences or massive reprisals against Christians in Israel for “speaking out,” whereas any similar Christian criticism”or even questioning”of an Arab government in the region, or Islamic extremism, would”well, we all saw what happened after Regensburg.

In a statement meant to be fully and intensely Christian, Israel was singled out for blame and criticism. That’s not fair, much less Christian. "

William Doino Jr. is a contributor to Inside the Vatican magazine , among many other publications, and writes often about religion, history and politics. His annotated bibliography on Pius XII appears in The Pius War: Responses to the Critics of Pius XII (Lexington Books, 2004). His most recent articles for “On the Square” were Pius XII and the Distorting Ellipsis and Pope Benedict Confounds His Critics

Anonymous said...

More about Pope Leo
The Bible & War
The New York Post nypost.com has an article
"Pope Leo needs to brush up his Bible — and its lessons on war and peace"
By Rich Lowry
Published April 14, 2026

Anonymous said...

mycharisma.com has an article
"Are Jews Still God’s Chosen People? What the Bible Really Says About Israel Today"
By James Lasher April 15, 2026

Anonymous said...

allisraelnews.com has an article
"Home at last: The first Christian Zionist to visit the modern Jewish state"
by
O. S. Hawkins April 12, 2026

oneforisrael.org has an article
"Replacement Theology Undone by One Greek Word in Galatians 6:16"

eitan.bar has an article
"What Is Replacement Theology, And How To Debunk It?"
by Dr. Eitan Bar
July 19, 2023

freerepublic.com has an article
"12 Reasons Why Supersessionism/Replacement Theology Is Not A Biblical Doctrine"
by
Michael Vlach
Posted on 4/30/2012

wayoflife.org has an article
"A Refutation of Replacement Theology"
May 11, 2022
by
David Cloud

kesherjournal.com has an article
"Toward Paul’s Ephesians 2 Vision of the One New Man: Navigating Around Hebrew Roots and Replacement Theologies"
By David Rudolph
August 17, 2022

wayoflife.org has an article
"Proof Texts of Replacement Theology"
December 11, 2017
by
David Cloud

joestrumpet.com has an article
"Debunking Replacement Theology’s Top Five
Favorite Proof Texts "
by
Joel Richardson

icejusa.org has an article
"Replacement Theology: What It Is and Why It Matters for Christians"
September 5, 2024

Anonymous said...

blogs.timesofisrael.com has an article by
Mike Evans
"Tucker Carlson, Welcome to the Bible Land"
Feb 18, 2026

ffoz.org has an article
"Dismantling Replacement Theology"
by
D. Thomas Lancaster
14 May 2025

Anonymous said...

spiritandtruth.org has an article
"Q42 : Romans 9:6 - For they are not all Israel who are of Israel"

Anonymous said...

israelmyglory.org has an article
"The Israel to Come"
May/June 2009 Tom Simcox
This article says
"The world has a plan for Israel. It thinks it knows how to bring peace to this tortured land. Yet all its attempts—the Camp David Accords, Oslo, Wye River, and the Road Map to peace—have only led to more terrorist attacks and suicide bombers. The current “two-state solution” to create a Palestinian state alongside Israel will fare no better.

As the world slices and dices the land God promised to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob into indefensible, noncontiguous entities, Scripture presents a different peace plan––one that is forever settled in the heavens because it was decreed by the Lord of heaven and earth.

Some of Israel’s God-ordained boundaries are difficult to pinpoint on a modern map. A number of scholars have gone so far as to say Israel will extend from Egypt as far north as Turkey and as far east as Babylon. Others disagree. We can see from Scripture, however, that Israel will one day encompass the hotly disputed areas of Gaza, the West Bank, and the Golan Heights, as well as a large portion of Lebanon and a small part of Syria.

The first mention of the land grant is in Genesis 15:18–21:

The Lᴏʀᴅ made a covenant with Abram, saying: “To your descendants I have given this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the River Euphrates—the Kenites, the Kenezzites, the Kadmonites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Rephaim, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Girgashites, and the Jebusites” (Gen. 15:18–21).

The borders of this land mass appear in Numbers, Ezekiel, and Obadiah. The southern and western borders are the easiest to ascertain. Although the River of Egypt may refer to the Nile, many evangelical scholars believe, as stated by Walter Kaiser, that “it is more accurately placed at the Wadi el-‘Arish which reaches the Mediterranean Sea at the town of El-‘Arish, some ninety miles east of the Suez Canal and almost fifty miles southwest of Gaza.”1

The southern border can easily be traced around the Dead (“Salt”) Sea (Num. 34:3–5) to Kadesh Barnea to the River of Egypt (the Wadi) and out to the Mediterranean Sea, which is the western border: “The south side, toward the South, shall be from Tamar to the waters of Meribah by Kadesh, along the brook [the Wadi, also called the Brook of Egypt; v. 5] to the Great Sea [Mediterranean]” (Ezek. 47:19).

The northern border is more difficult to place. Because God gave Israel the land of the Hittites, and Hittites appear to have occupied Turkey, some scholars say Israel eventually will occupy Turkey as well. However, that seems doubtful. Also, some of the cities used as markers do not exist today. What is clear is that the border comes extremely close to Damascus, Syria, which some commentators include as part of future Israel.

This shall be the border of the land on the north: from the Great Sea [Mediterranean], by the road to Hethlon, as one goes to Zedad, Hamath, Berothah, Sibraim (which is between the border of Damascus and the border of Hamath), to Hazar Hatticon….Thus the boundary shall be from the Sea to Hazar Enan, the border of Damascus; and as for the north, northward, it is the border of Hamath. This is the north side (Ezek. 47:15–17).

Charles Dyer identified Zedad “with the town of Sadad about 25 miles north of Damascus.”2 Charles Ryrie, however, said it is “possibly a town about 65 miles NE. of Damascus.”3 Either way gives Israel land that is now part of Syria.

From there the boundary descends to include the highly disputed Golan Heights. It travels “from between Hauran and Damascus, and between Gilead and the land of Israel, along the Jordan, and along the eastern side of the sea [Dead Sea]” (v. 18)."

Anonymous said...

The article continues
"When Israel entered the Promised Land, God told the Israelites they would not get Edom, Moab, or Ammon (Dt. 2:4–5, 8–9, 18–19), all of which today are in Jordan. However, some interpret Obadiah 19 to mean that Israel will possess some of that land in the Millennium. Wrote Ryrie:

[Israel] shall possess the Negev, that is, Mount Esau, etc. In other words, the boundaries of the Davidic kingdom will include the territory formerly occupied by Edom in the south, the inhabitants of the Philistine lowland (Gath, Ekron, Ashdod, Ashkelon, Gaza), the territory of Ephraim and Samaria, Gilead across the Jordan River, and as far north as Zarephath (between Tyre and Sidon).4

Zarephath is in Lebanon.

Even though some of the biblical landmarks are difficult to pinpoint today, the Bible still provides enough information to allow a glimpse of the breadth and scope of the wonderful inheritance that awaits the Jewish people in the Millennium.

Wrote commentator Allen P. Ross: “Israel has never possessed this land in its entirety, but she will when Christ returns to reign as Messiah.”5

What a day it will be when Israel will finally possess all God has given it. King Messiah will reign on the throne of David for 1,000 years, “and the kingdom [the entire Earth] shall be the Lᴏʀᴅ’s” (Obad. 21)."

firmisrael.org has an article
"8 Biblical Reasons to Stand with Israel Today"
By Jack Hayford
Posted November 15th 2023

blogs.timesofisrael.com
has an article
by
Harold L. Katz
"Not Improbable, Impossible"
April 23, 2026

Anonymous said...

Ron Cantor
@RonSCantor posted on X
"Few verses in Paul’s letters get hijacked more often than Romans 9:6: “For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel.”

Replacement theologians love this one. To them, it's the smoking gun — proof that Paul quietly redefined “Israel” to mean the Church. The Jewish people, they argue, forfeited their place; the “New Israel” is now anyone who believes in Yeshua, regardless of bloodline. Case closed.

The most sophisticated version of the argument comes from N.T. Wright, who has spent thousands of pages — most fully in Paul and the Faithfulness of God — insisting that Paul has “redefined” Israel “around the Messiah.” On Wright’s reading, the true Israel is now the Messianic family of Jew and Gentile together, while ethnic Israel, apart from faith, no longer carries the covenantal weight it once did. Wright resists the label “replacement theology,” and to his credit he is more careful than most. But the destination is functionally the same: Israel as a people, in any meaningful covenantal sense, has been absorbed.

It’s a clean argument. It’s also wrong.

Let me show you why — and to do that, we just need to do something that’s apparently radical in certain theological circles: read the chapter Paul actually wrote.
Start where Paul starts

You cannot understand Romans 9:6 without Romans 9:1-5. And what does Paul say there? He tells us he has “great sorrow and unceasing anguish” in his heart. For whom? For his “kinsmen according to the flesh” — Israel. He is so grieved over their unbelief that he says he could wish himself “accursed and cut off from Messiah” for their sake.

Then he lists what still belongs to them: “the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the Law, the worship, and the promises… the patriarchs, and from them, according to the flesh, is the Messiah.”

Stop and think about that for a second. If Paul believed ethnic Israel had been replaced by the Church:

Why is he weeping?
Why the anguish?
Why list — in the present tense, “to them belong,” not belonged— covenants and promises that supposedly no longer belong to them?

You don't grieve over a people God has cast off. You grieve over a people God still loves.

WHAT 9:6 ACTUALLY SAYS!

Now we are ready for verse 6: “For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel, and not all are children because they are Abraham’s offspring.”

Paul is making a distinction within the Jewish people, not replacing them with someone else. He is saying what every Hebrew prophet said before him: physical descent from Abraham does not automatically make you faithful. Throughout the Tanakh (the Hebrew Bible), God always preserved a believing remnant inside the larger nation — Elijah’s seven thousand who had not bowed to Baal, Isaiah’s faithful few. Paul is standing squarely in that prophetic tradition.

There is “Israel” — the entire physical nation descended from Jacob. And there is the believing remnant within Israel — Jews who trust the God of their fathers. Both are Israel. The remnant does not replace the rest; it lives inside the rest as a sign of God’s continued faithfulness to His covenant people. In fact, Romans 11 suggests that the faithful remnant intercedes for the unfaithful whole. (see Romans 11:5-6, 16)."

Anonymous said...

& continues
"Now notice what Paul does not say. He does not say, “And so the Gentiles are now the true Israel.” He does not even hint at it here. That reading has to be smuggled into the text from outside, which is why it was over 100 years before anyone began to preach such a thing.

PINEAPPLE

If I fly to Hawaii, eat a pineapple, and taste flavors I have never experienced in any pineapple anywhere else, I might turn to my wife and say, “I don't think I have ever had pineapple before!” Of course, I have had pineapple. Plenty of times. Nobody listening would accuse me of lying. They would hear the rhetoric. What I am actually saying is: yes, I have had pineapple, but the pineapple here is so much better that it is as if I have never tasted pineapple in my life.

That is exactly what Paul is doing in Romans 9:6. He is saying that the truest, deepest, most realized sense of belonging to Israel is having a living relationship with the God of Israel through Yeshua. It is a rhetorical move, not a redefinition. Paul is not erasing ethnic Israel; he is emphasizing what covenantal Israel looks like at its fullest.

The trouble is that we tend to flatten the Bible. Taking the biblical narrative literally is good. Treating every single word as literal — and refusing to make room for rhetoric, hyperbole, and literary devices — is not. Everyone uses these tools. Including Yeshua Himself. Do you really think He wants you to poke out your eye? To hate your father and mother? Of course not. That is hyperbole, not instruction. And it is exactly the kind of language Paul is reaching for in Romans 9:6.

ROMANS 11 SLAMS THE DOOR

If there were any lingering doubt, Paul shuts it down two chapters later: “I ask, then, has God rejected His people? By no means!” (Romans 11:1). And then he says it again, just to make sure no one missed it: “God has not rejected His people whom He foreknew” (11:2). This is two chapters after romans 9:6, so either Paul is contradicting himself or those who are using Romans 9:6 to demonize Israel do not understand Paul.

Then comes the olive tree. Gentile believers, Paul says, are wild branches grafted into a cultivated tree whose root is Jewish. The natural branches that were broken off can be — and will be — grafted back in. “And in this way all Israel will be saved” (11:26).

That is not replacement. That is not even within shouting distance of replacement. That is restoration.

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT TODAY?

This is exactly the point R. Kendall Soulen made so forcefully in The God of Israel and Christian Theology. Soulen showed that even Christian theologies that claim to honor Israel often quietly assume God’s covenant with the Jewish people was merely the prologue to a universal Church that would eventually render it obsolete. He gave that quiet assumption a name — “structural supersessionism” — and argued, rightly, that it cannot survive a serious reading of Paul. The election of Israel, for Soulen, is not a discarded first chapter. It is permanent, irrevocable, and the very framework within which the gospel itself unfolds."

Anonymous said...

& lastly says
"Once you see that, the stakes of Romans 9:6 become obvious.

If Romans 9:6 means the Church has replaced Israel, then the modern State of Israel is a theological accident. The return of millions of Jews to the land, the rebirth of Hebrew as a living language, the regathering Ezekiel and Isaiah described in detail — all of it would be meaningless, or worse, a deception. Some replacement theologians have actually said exactly that. They interpret the promises of the restoration of Israel, spiritually, so the actual restoration of Israel was just a massive coincidence that God somehow didn’t notice happening.

To be clear: this is not about the theology itself being argued. Theologians have wrestled with Romans 9 for two thousand years. That is what theologians do, and there is nothing wrong with the academic debate. What changed after October 7 is that this verse stopped being a seminary discussion point and became a slogan in the mouths of people who do not study Paul, do not love the Bible, and do not care what Soulen or Wright or anyone else thinks. They are quoting Romans 9:6 — six words from a Jewish apostle weeping over his own people — as proof that God has finally rejected the Jews, and that whatever happens to them now is therefore justified. They are not making a theological argument. They are using a Bible verse, out of context, to baptize their antisemitism. And that is exactly why this is so important today.

But if Paul means what he says — that God still has a people, that the natural branches will be regrafted, that “all Israel will be saved” — then what we are watching unfold today is precisely what the prophets promised.

The Jewish people are returning.
The land is bearing fruit.
A growing remnant of Israel is recognizing Yeshua as Messiah.

The trajectory is unmistakable to anyone willing to see it.

Romans 9:6 is not the death certificate of the Jewish people. It is a quiet reminder that even in Israel’s deepest unbelief, God has always preserved a remnant — and through that remnant, He is keeping every single promise He ever made, not the least of which is Romans 11:26, “and in this way all Israel should be saved.”

He has not replaced Israel.

He is restoring her.

—Dr. Ron Cantor
Sign up for our emails at http://roncantor.com, and we will send you a free book on Israel and revival."
5:18 AM · May 5, 2026

Anonymous said...

allisraelnews.com has an article
by
Susan Michael | May 10, 2026
"Israel in the New Testament"

theevidence.org.uk has an article
"Regathering and rebirth of the Jewish nation"

Anonymous said...

camera.org has an article
"Sojourners Magazine Opinion Piece Distorts Facts about Christian Zionism"
By: David Orenstein, PhD
May 11, 2026

Anonymous said...

allisraelnews.com has an article
"The historical origins of Christian Zionism"
by Susan Michael
May 19, 2026

Anonymous said...

allisraelnews.com has an article
"From Restorationism to Zionism: The Christian roots of support for Israel"
by
Tuvia Pollack | Published: May 22, 2026

allisraelnews.com has an article
by
Emir Phillips | December 22, 2025
"Jews have come home in unbelief – Exactly as the prophets said"


YouTube has a video
"Why Tucker Carlson Is Dead Wrong About Israel- A Biblical Response to His Ted Cruz Interview"
June 28, 2025
by
Passion For Truth Ministries

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 222 of 222   Newer› Newest»