The Miracle of Zionism

"Israel is the only nation in the world that is governing itself in the same territory, under the same name, and with the same religion and same language as it did 3,000 years ago." - Historian Barbara Tuchman

"Israel is the only nation on the face of the earth that was created by a sovereign act of God" - Pastor John Hagee

"All things are mortal but the Jew; all other forces pass, but he remains. What is the secret of his immortality?" - Author / Atheist, Mark Twain (long before the Holocaust and Israeli-Jewish statehood)

"They are the most glorious nation that ever inhabited this Earth. The Romans and their Empire were but a Bauble in comparison of the Jews. They have given religion to three quarters of the Globe and have influenced the affairs of Mankind more, and more happily, than any other Nation ancient or modern." - President John Adams - His 1808 response letter criticizing the depiction of Jews by the French Enlightenment philosopher Voltaire.

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Jewish Converison and The Messianics

Today in America there is a tremendous pull to separate the Jewish soul from his covenant with the God of Israel through conversion. In June 1996 at the Southern Baptist Convention in New Orleans their 10th resolution on Jewish evangelism was passed. The mandate to this resolution was this: "to develop evangelistic ministries among Jews and start churches in predominantly Jewish communities." Now here is my question for Southern Baptist as well as other denominations who seeks Jewish conversion: Why are the Jews of Judaism who represent one of the tiniest religions in the world are the ones most specially targeted for conversion purposes?

The Southern Baptist is the largest Protestant denomination in the United States with approximately 16 million members. That’s more members in this single Christian denomination in the United States than the entire world-wide Jewish population! Yet, out of all the other religions of the world including Islam (the second largest and fastest growing religion of the world), and a thousand of other Christian denominations to whom the Southern Baptist oppose doctrinally (including the Catholic Church, the most numerous single religious denomination in the world), it is Judaism (one of the smallest religions of the world) that is singled out as “the prize catch” for conversion at these Southern Baptist conventions. Again, my question is, why the Jews?
.
Since 1867 the Southern Baptist (who originally supported black slavery) has passed ten resolutions (averaging about one every fourteen years) urging their organization leaders and members to convert the Jews. Historically, how many resolutions at these conventions do you suppose the Southern Baptist organization has passed concerning conversion of other religions such as Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Catholicism (the “Mother of Harlots” of Revelation 17:5 as believed by Southern Baptist)? Let me give you a hint: Its more than minus-one, but less than one! It is therefore fair to say, that the Southern Baptists seeks out the tiny member Jewish nation for conversion more than ten times the amount as other world religions or non-Southern Baptist. One more time, why the Jews? What is it about these Jews and their covenant that causes this great uncontrollable pulsating urges among the Gentile evangelicals to persistently and methodically seek out Jewish conversion?
.
To understand the evangelical psyche of Jewish favoritism for conversion, one has to realize that what motivates these evangelicals is theological domination rather than a genuine love for the Jewish soul. The evangelicals who target Jewish are really fighting (not even being aware of it subconsciously) for the validity of their Christianity by favoring Jewish conversion over their fellow Gentile conversion. Isn’t a soul a soul and an eternal life an eternal life regardless if that life is a Jew or Gentile? Not from some, (if not most) evangelists viewpoints. I heard of one minister telling a prominent rabbi that he had rather convert one single Jew to Christianity than convert over 50,000 Gentiles! What is the spiritual logic and reasoning to this? What is the over-all motive in such conversion desires coming from Christian leaders?
.
As is was from the beginning of Christianity, modern Christianity hinges on Jewish conversion and without that Jewish conversion Christianity losses its force, (Romans 1:16, 2:9-10) especially just before and at the End of Days that we are now approaching (Romans 11:25-28). It is the "Jew" that lends any spiritual credibility to the Church, not the Gentiles no matter how abundant they may be. This is why we see such a strong push among many of the Gentile churches trying in their minds, to return the church to its “Jewish roots” by incorporating Jewish style rituals into their Christian worship. They are doing whatever they can to incorporate themselves into the covenant that God has with Israel without the proper credentials while seeking to convert every Jew that they can away from of that very covenant! They are making the same spiritual mistake that the Jew-what-to-be Samaritians made when they tried to make Mount Gerizim God's provided place of worship instead of David's Jerusalem as the true place to worship (see St. John 4:20,22).
.
Both Christianity and Islam have used force and intimidation to persuade Jews to convert for centuries, but in societies where the Church don’t have absolute control over secular governments, proselytizing in many different forms and methods have become the norm. For example, never before until now has there been so many evangelical Christians dressing, eating, drinking, talking, and acting like orthodox Jews. They call themselves Messianic Christians, Hebrew Believers, Jews for Jesus, Completed Jews, as well as other names that indicates their mixing of Christianity with traditional Jewish beliefs. Most of their rituals are Jewish biblical rituals, and even including non-biblical Jewish traditions such as wearing yarmulkes, lighting Hanukkah candles, and conducting Seder Passover meals, all the while claiming that they only stick with the scriptures and the Rabinnic Jews whom they imitate to the core, are false.
.
Can you image the Medieval Christians of Europe expressing their Christianity by using Jewish traditions? In many places throughout Christian Europe it was forbidden on pains of death for Christians to have any dealings with the Jews or to even be present at a Jewish service, much less to eat, drink, dress, talk, or act like the hated Jews! So why now in this present day can we find in any big city’s phone book, a yellow-page listing of a messianic synagogue (in the synagogue section) when one was not even heard of before 1970’s?
.
This is a relatively new tactic used by the evangelicals since the old methods failed to yield the desired body-count. I use that term because this “tactic of disguise” is actually a military tactic in which I am surprised it has taken as long as it has for the evangelicals to use it. How many times in history has an army disguise itself to look, act, and talk like their enemy in order to wipe out the ones whom they were dressed and acting like? If true Judaism would ceased to be, it would only be a matter of weeks before the messianic movements would collapse. The reason why: There is no reason to keep working once a job has been completed.
.
Here is what I see the Messianic movement leaders saying to their students (in my own radical way):“If you are going to go out and trick the Jews into Christianity instead of killing them or forcibly converting them, you must be trained in the art of Jewish disguise.”
Rule # 1. “Never expose your true beliefs openly as they are, but make it sound Jewish.”
Rule # 2. “Don’t let him know you mean to wipe out the Jewish nation through conversion to a cult. Rather, make the Jew think that he is staying Jewish when in reality he is like Esau, giving up his birth right.”
Rule #3. “Though you hate the very depths of their souls because they are Jews, show them love-love-love. Ask them about their families, invite them over to your house, see if they need anything, and tell them about how you just love and support the Jewish people and the State of Israel. Now, here is your training card when conversing with a Jew using Biblical issues. Remember, make him think its Jewish!”
.
To see how far the Messianics will go to lure scriptural-ungrounded Jews (or evens Gentiles for that matter), into their cult is really quite amazing. For the sole purpose of converting Jews, they have created what they call a “Complete Jewish Bible” interpolated (not translated) by David H. Stren. Its not called a “Holy Bible” or “Holy Scriptures” but a “Complete Jewish Bible”. Stren just had to make sure he got that keyword “Jewish” on the front cover to create a Jewish lure. What Stren does with his so-called “Jewish” bible is essentially this:
1. He has taken the English language and mixed it with Hebrew sounding names (as do many Messianics with their own personal names) to give it that special Jewish effect.
2. He placed the books of the Old Testament in the same order as found in the Jewish Bible, since the Christian Bible has them in a different order than that of a Jewish Bible. In so doing, Stren sought to carefully eradicate any reminders that might appear to the Jew as being “different” or non-Jewish in the traditional sense.
3. He added Jewish Parashahs (weekly synagogue readings sections), so it will mimic a Jewish Bible used in traditional synagogue services. To stimulate Jewish conversion, the Jew don’t have to give up his Shabbat (Jewish Sabbath) for the Sunday worship anymore. This bible is intended to aid to Jew in continuing with this ancient Jewish Parashah practice.
4. He added the New Testament books (also with Hebrew sounding names) by which no separation distinction is made as it is found in a typical Christian Bible, in order to stress the belief that the New Testament is a continuation of the Jewish Bible instead of an addition. Additions causes questions, especially when the Jews were taught that their Jewish Bible is complete.
5. He added Jewish Bible-like sections to his New Testament so that it will appear similar and in continuance with the Jewish Bible. As the Jewish Bible is broken up into three sections called The Torah, The Prophets, and The Writings, Stren sought to continue that trait by adding sections of his own in the New Testament such as “Sha’ul’s (Paul’s) Letters to Communities” and “Sha’ul’s (Paul’s) Pastoral Letters”.
6. He added his own personal “corrections” in the New Testament which according to the publisher were: “mistranslations that resulted from anti-Jewish theological bias”. Meaning, anything that might offend the Jews as being anti-Jewish had to be removed or retranslated in order to make it easier for Jew to swallow.
.
The whole purpose of Stren’s messianic bible is the same as the whole purpose of the messianic movement in general, and that is to put forth enough Jewish appearance in order to trick and beguile as many people with Jewish backgrounds as possible, away from their covenant into another religion (or in this case a religious cult) as possible! It is kind of funny, but guess what the New Testament book of “Hebrews” is called in Stren’s bible? It’s not “Eve-reem” meaning “Hebrews” in Hebrew, but his book of Hebrews is called: “Messianic Jews”. Go figure.
.
What does this kind of childish-trickery evangelism say about the Jewish-disguised evangelist themselves? It says that they themselves believe their religious doctrine and beliefs must be disguised and sugar coated in order for it to be received by unsuspecting Jews, and without such deception it will surely fail. It also states that they are so fixated on seeing the Jews convert from their ancient heritage belief system that they are willing and able to stoop to whatever lows are necessary to see it accomplished. The New Testament by itself isn’t good enough to do the desired job of Jewish conversion in their minds, so it needs a little deception-help. In their minds and rightfully so, it will take an extraordinary effort to convert the chosen people out of being chosen so their offspring too will cease to be “chosen” - there is a three or four generation rule that whenever a Jew converts form the covenant, within three to four generations his offspring looses all identity as Jews (Exodus 20:5).
.
What does it say about the mainstream church organizations such as the Baptists and Assembly of God, who support the messianic movement efforts but still separate from them doctrinally? It says quite a lot. Such support actually remains me of the principles that the Palestinian suicide bombers use when they dress themselves up in Hasidic Jewish attire in order to blow themselves up from among the Jews. It is prohibited in the Palestinian society for a Palestinian to dress like a Jew unless he is doing it for the Palestinian cause of killing Jews, in which case, will bring him much praise for doing so from among the other Jew-hating Palestinians. Likewise, the mainstream churches are opposed doctrinally of dressing in TziTzis, having worship services on Saturday, and drinking four cups of wine on Passover, but they will give full support and blessings to these Messianics who practice these things for the cause a Jewish conversion into Christianity. They might wish to have them in their traditional church for a denominational feather in the hat, but as long as the Jew separates himself from his God-given covenant for some form a Christianity - well, that’s the main thing! The Jews must be saved at all cost from his covenant that the God of Israel gave them to a Christian covenant using the same logo.
.
Another display of messianic Christianity spiritual motive as well as their uprightness in heart is given in Jackie Mason’s 2006 lawsuit against the group “Jews for Jesus”. Everybody (especially the people in New York) knows Mason is Jewish (in his own words, “as a matzo ball”). What prompted Mason to file the lawsuit was a "Jews for Jesus" tract that featured an image of himself along with the words “Jackie Mason ... A Jew for Jesus!?” This tract was intended to make the unsuspecting Jew to think that Mason being the prominent Jew he is, had became a Christian and joined the Jews for Jesus organization. And if a well prominent Jew like Mason can became a messianic Christian, then surely they being Jewish should see about becoming one as well? At least that was the thinking of the tract creators. Susan Perlman, was the spokeswoman for Jews for Jesus, and said the tract was “good-natured” and “Shame on him (Mason) for getting so upset about this”. The tract was “good-natured”? Since when is a willful outright, deceiving, evil lie about someone “good natured”? Would she be "shamefully" upset if the Jewish organizations in her area printed and passed out pamphlets to messianic Christians that featured an image of her on the front cover that stated “Susan Perlman denounces Jews for Jesus”? Would this kind of pamphlet bearing her image be “good natured” too, or would it be deemed by her and others within the Jews for Jesus camp as: “those bad O Jews are trying to persecute us good O Christians” at that point?
.
What gets me is the lying audacity that groups like "Jews for Jesus" has when it comes to seeking-out Jewish conversion! To them, it is far better to lie in Jesus’s name and convert a Jew, than to be honest and let a unknowing Jew keep his / her faith! And what really gets me is the fact that other Christians will applaud their effects if they are able to pull-off a Jewish conversion, with such lying acceptance as “oh well, God can even use deceit to change a sinner’s heart”. But if the roles were reversed and Christians were giving up their faith to follow Judaism, then it would be high spiritual treason against the church. To me, its utterly disgusting that someone can even believe that God could glory in such a false-base foundation for the belief in Him.

Sunday, December 2, 2007

Gaza, The Jews, and a Palestinian State


Until recently the last massive wave of Jewish expulsions occurred in Europe under Nazi rule before World War II, and from Islamic countries who were protesting Israel becoming a state. The most recent Jewish expulsion has occurred in August, 2005 with more to follow.

Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s decision to uproot Jewish residents from areas of their ancient homeland was greatly influenced by three major political announcements:
1. President Bush’s State of the Union address on June 24, 2002, in which he declared his vision for a Palestinian state.
2. Statement from the Quartet (United Nations, the European Union, Russia and the United States) in New York, on September 17, 2002, regarding the “Three-Phase Plan for Mid-East Peace”.
3. President Bush’s Roadmap to Peace in the Middle East that was unveiled to the world on April 30, 2003.
.
During this time President Bush was placing restrictions on loan guarantees to Israel in order to move Sharon towards his "unilateral" decision . One such pressure came on September 16, 2003 just four months after Bush unveiled his plan.
.
Sharon’s plan of uprooting the Jewish presence from Gaza was designed not only to ensure President Bush and the Quartet that Israel was committed towards their roadmap plan, but by doing so he was foolishly hoping to be able to keep some of the Jewish populated and military strategic areas in the ancient Jewish homeland in a final status agreement of the roadmap plan. Sharon’s plan seemed to have worked at least momentarily, as Bush assured him in a letter dated April 14, 2004:
.
"We welcome the disengagement plan you have prepared, under which Israel would withdraw certain military installations and all settlements from Gaza, and withdraw certain military installations and settlements in the West Bank. These steps described in the plan will mark real progress toward realizing my June 24, 2002 vision…."
.
In verifying that Jewish expulsion in Gaza was part of the United States roadmap plan President Bush seemingly rewarded Sharon by promising him in the same letter that future Jewish expulsions from Judea and Samaria would be averted:
.
"In light of new realities on the ground, including already existing major Israeli population centers, it is unrealistic to expect that the outcome of final status negotiations will be a full and complete return to the armistice lines of 1949..."
.
However, just as soon as the Gaza expulsion was being completed, and in keeping up the United States’ tradition of breaking promises for their own interest, State Department spokesman Sean McCormack made the following statement in a State Department briefing on August 24, 2005:
.
"…with respect to our understanding of the settlements and settlement activity and with respect to our understanding about any changes to the 1949 armistice line, those are issues that must be agreed to by both parties. "
.
In other words, the Bush Administration was basically telling Sharon the following: “Thank you so much for making all of Gaza Judenrein, (a German-Nazi word, meaning, “cleansed of Jews”) and for using our Quartet-sponsored lie to convince the Israeli government and half of its Israeli citizens that Gaza should become Judenrein for the sake of peace of which you will never see. And by the way, unless the Palestinians who want all of Israel Judenrein to begin with, agree to allow Jews to stay in their ancestral land of Judea and Samaria, expect more US pressured / Quartet-sponsored Judenreins to be placed upon those ancient Jewish lands as well - yours truly, President George W. Bush".
.
Questions concerning this purposed Palestinian state:
  • In a free and democratic state of Palestine that implements free elections and full human rights that Bush believes will occur as a result of his roadmap plan, why couldn’t the Jews of Gaza, who have lived there for over 38 years, became citizens of this new Palestinian state in the eyes of any world governments including the United States?
  • Why didn’t any of the major world news medias who had something to report concerning Gaza on a daily basis leading up to the Jewish expulsion, never mentioned the idea of the Jews staying in Gaza under Palestinian rule? Since the Jews were not prisoners of the Israeli government, shouldn’t they have been afforded the opportunity to live where ever they wish to, especially in the same communities and homes that they have lived in most or all of their lives?
  • Is there something ludicrous about the idea of the free minority Jewish community in Gaza wishing to stay in Gaza under a Palestinian government? Why would a Jewish minority in a free and democratic Palestinian state of which all minorities would have full and equal rights, be out of the question?
  • If there is something ludicrous about the idea of the Jews living free and peacefully within a Palestinian state, then what does that say about such a state itself that President Bush is trying so hard to create? I mean, what is there to fear? Since Bush has spent 400 million dollars a year promoting a Palestinian state then surely in his mind he envisions that a Palestine democratic state will end its death threats to Israel and embrace security and equality for its Jewish minority? Yeah, right!
  • Will this new Palestinian democratic state that will supposedly live side by side with Israel in peace allow Jews from anywhere in the world to visit places within Gaza, Judea, and Samaria that holds significant ancient Jewish history, or will such state follow in the same Islamic footsteps with places like Saudi Arabia and not allow Jews to set foot in their land based upon their race and religion?http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/02/28/visa.flap/index.html

In January 2006 the Palestinians made known to all the world what type of government they wanted to represent them by overwhelmingly voting in a Hamas-lead government in their first parliamentary election since the death of Arafat! The Palestinians wasn’t forced to vote for either Fatah or Hamas, they could have so easely opted to simply withheld their vote in protest for either of the two terrorist groups if they were so anti-terrorism minded to do so. The world media portrayed this election to be between only Hamas and Al-Fatah. However, they weren't the only parties available for the Palestinians to hang their spiritual and political values on. The Palestinian people, as a people, gave the “liberal” party "Third Path" (one that at lest gave lip-service of recognizing Israel) a whopping two seats in the elections compared to the seventy-four seats that they as a people gave the terrorists of Hamas. As Hamas leader Khaled Meshal correctly stated just four days after the election, “The Palestinian people have chosen Hamas with its known stances.” Hamas’ covenant is even more explicit concerning the destruction of Israel than the PLO’s covenant ever thought about being. Therefore, what is the Hamas-electing Palestinians main motive for a state? Are their hearts for the most part, set on self-rule, or are their hearts for the most part, set on the destruction of the State of Israel? How a society votes tells an awful lot about the society itself.

Can a society that fully embraces the act of religious suicide for the purpose of murdering multiple Jews, ever love themselves more than they hate the Jews? That is a question to really ponder over concerning the Mid-East conflict as a whole. It was even the "moderate" West-loved, Palestinian poster-boy, President Abbas who referred to suicide murderers as "shahids (martyrs) who have entered the gardens of paradise". And if the Palestinians are incapable of loving themselves more than they hate the Jews, what kind of a state is the Quartet trying to create with these Palestinians?

I maybe a bit radical here, but I believe that the Gentile nations are spiritually not trying to merely create a Palestinian state for the sake of self-rule, but an actual Jew-killing state that will continue the Gentile conceived plan once known to us as the "Final Solution". This would be similar to evil prison guards placing of violent inmate in a cell with another inmate to harm him without the guards themselves being blamed for physically assaulting the inmate. The nations are wanting the Palestinians to do their Finial Solution dirty work for them. When one reads the Hamas Covenant and see just how far the Quartet is willing to go out of its way for the sake of a Hamas-electing Palestinian state, along with their illogical support at every level regardless of their terrorist activity, there is no another way to spiritually view it! The following is just one out of thousands of examples of proof that a real Gentile conspiracy exist. It's part of what I call "The Protocols of the Elders of the Goyim (Gentiles)":
  • On December 17, 2007 ninety Gentile nations (well over half of the entire nations on the globe) pledged 7.4 billion (billion with a "B") to Israel's most vicious and murderous enemy. The US alone (Israel's most trusted ally) pledged 550 million dollars to these Hamas-electing people. With this pledge came a warning from the Gentile world banks - not to the Palestinians on being responsible with such a great donation as to not use the money for the promotion of terrorism, Jew-murder, and the like, but to Israel. That unless Israel loosens their security checkpoints and allows the Palestinian terrorists more mobility, their world pledge amount of 7.4 billion will be a waste of time and money. In other words, it will be Israel's fault for having tight security in the first place against a people whose culture includes suicide bombings rather than a Palestinian fault for not controlling their own people in trying to dismantle suicide bombings that are very much apart of their evil culture! In the world's evil mind, it's the peaceful Israelis who should be pressured to find a way to make peace with the terrorist instead of pressuring the Palestinians into being responsible for their terrorist actions! Therefore, if Israel has the audacity to keep their tight security in place in an attempt to keep their murder rate down from people who wish to murder them, then the Gentile world powers will be watching with money in-hand to blame the Jewish victims of terror instead of the Gentile guilty terrorist themselves.
More Questions concerning Palestinians and statehood:
  • Is it possible for the Palestinians to rid themselves from their anti-Semitism which is in their political DNA and foundation as a people, once they have obtained statehood?
    To answer this question, one can simply look and see if the Gaza Palestinians have become more peaceful or more aggressive with Israel since they were given full control of Gaza in August, 2005. That's right. The Judenrein of Gaza can be a "measuring stick" as what is to come to the West Bank following its Judenrein!
  • Have more rockets than ever before been fired from Gaza or has less rockets been fired from Gaza than ever before?
  • Have terrorist attacks increased dramatically or have terrorist attacks decreased dramatically from out of Gaza?
  • Is stronger terrorist organizations such as Hezbolla and Islamic Army a.k.a. Al-Qudea operating in Gaza or is there less terrorist organization activities in Gaza since the Israeli pullout? Again, these are all tall-tell signs of how the Palestinian mind will change its course towards peace once statehood and further advancement of territories has been accomplished.
  • Is their ancient Jew-hatred that is openly expressed in every facet of life among the overwhelming majority of the Palestinian people (before and after 1948 and 1967) simply due to a lack of statehood? To answer this question, one has to honestly ask themselves what had the Palestinians rather have?
    A. Their own state along side Israel.
    B. Their own state with there being no State of Israel.
    Remember, what they had rather have is exactly what they will ultimately seek with religious fervor.
  • Would a Palestinian state next to Israel cause the Palestinians to decrease, stay the same, or increase their desire to destroy Israel? The Palestinians’ pre-1967 expressed thoughts should help answer this question. Also, when a Palestinian school textbooks recognizes Israel as a legitimate state, and when religious Imams in the Palestinian area stop demonizing Israel and condemn those who do, that’s when we will all know that the Palestinian people are truly seeking a peace with the nation of Israel. But everyone knows (except George W. Bush) that all of Islam will covert to Judaism and become strong world Zionist before that would ever happen!
  • Why didn't we hear anything about a Palestinian state between 1948 and 1967? Was this because of the 1300 years of Islamic hatred for the Jewish people that is embedded in the hearts and minds of the Palestinian people the real driving force for seeking statehood more exposed since 1967? And if so, wouldn’t statehood simply feed that ancient Jew-hatred? A historical view of what befalls innocent Israelis every time “peace” is mentioned by both Israel and the Palestinian leaders should help make a definite answer to this question possible.
  • Will a “State of Palestine” be friendly to America and to Western values after American and UN driving forces see to it that a Palestinian state if formed? A good look at the Palestinians jumping up and down with joyous glee right after 9/11 should guide the unaware soul to truthfully answer this question. However, if that isn’t enough, then the same question concerning Israel can be asked concerning America.
    Would the Palestinians as a whole and who would be living in an American created Palestinian state rather have:
    A. For the USA to contributing to issues in the Middle East including Palestine as it does today.
    B. A completely destroyed America, where all of its towers has fallen by the works of Palestine-sensitive jihadist.

The Jewish residents in Gaza were forced to uproot from their homes and businesses and hand it over to a people who shoot Kassam rockets into their neighborhoods and spray machine gun rounds into their school buses loaded with Jewish children. And for what reasons? There are two main reasons for such Islamic hostilities towards the Jewish people living in the region:
Reason #1. They are Jews.
Reason #2. Their religion is Judaism.

Let me put this into a dramatic perspective that is in tune with a harsh reality: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was brought about mainly to give equal fairness to the black citizens as well as other minorities in the United States concerning employment opportunity. It was enacted so that any portion of the majority that might discriminate against them using race or religion would not do so. Now try to imagine this same United States government that enacted the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 wanting to create a new state, and let’s say they wanted to place it somewhere in the southern portion of the United States. In this new imaginary state, the United States government has plans for it to be inhabited by white people only. Every black persn that is living within the borders of this new state would have to be uprooted along with all their belongings including the bodies of their buried dead loved ones and moved out of the area just so only the white people could have their “black-free state”! Every single home of the black community and their businesses are to handed over to only the white people already living in the area. Now let’s continue to imagine that these white people that are to take the homes and businesses from the black communities within this proposed new state are not your average white Joe. Oh no, these white people are devoted Klu Klux Klan and Aryan Nation members who have elected David Duke (who like the Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas is a Holocaust denier) to be their state governor. The people that are to drive these black people out of their homes and livelihoods are other blacks from surrounding states that have been so pressured by the United States government in order that they comply. Without going any farther with this analogy that sounds racially insane, let me say without any exaggerating whatsoever, that these are exactly the same principles of what was carried out in the ancient homeland of Israel against the Jews of Gaza by the prompting of the United States government along with the aid of the Quartet! Their goal: to create a Jew-free / Jew hating, Palestinian state!

How would the United States and the rest of the world respond if the Israeli government put into action the transfer of all Arabs, and not just some of the more radical Arabs, but every last one of them, not from Gaza or the West Bank, but from out of the borders of Israel proper? I can tell you how the United State would respond. They would stop all Israeli aid including military aid and all loan guarantees while sponsoring economic sanctions by themselves at the UN. The State Department would criticize Israel up one side and down the other while never ruling out military action in the form of a peace keeping force to “solve the crisis”. The cries of Appartite would ring through the House and Senate floors, and the news medias would absolutely go berserk. The world news media would not cease from calling Israel and Zionism racists like Russia did at the UN forum in 1975. Liberal CNN as well as conservative FOX news outlets would order thousands of new cameras for the thousands newly hired cameramen to video each and every Palestinian being force to leave their homes. The UN resolutions against Israel would be so numerous that the UN would have to hire hundreds of more employees to process them all, and the emergency meetings at the UN would be conducted once every week, even during the off season (January - August). The International Court of Justice (so-called), would have a happy field-day condemning Israel with every court session. If a security fence that has proven to reduce the mass murdering of Israeli citizens can draw world condemnation from the world governments (including the US and World Court) and from every media outlet from around the world, I can just imagine what kind of reaction that the world would express at the transferring of every Arab person within Israel’s borders. Yet, when it is concerning "the Jews" who are being evicted from their homes for simply being Jewish, and are forced completely away from an area that they have lived in most or all of their lives, the world governments and news medias then embrace this kind of action hook, line, and sinker, and then they have the cruel audacity to call it a “peace process”.

After all the political debate is said and done the bottom line of why each individual that was forced to leave the Gaza area in August, 2005 was due to their being Jewish and being identified as members of the Judaism religion. Every person in Gaza who started their morning prayers saying: “Allaahu Akbar” (Allah is most great), was permitted to keep their homes and livelihoods without interruption, but every person who began their morning prayer with “Shema Yesroel…” (Hear O Israel…) was automatically placed on the expulsion list, separated from their homes, businesses, communities, and forced to live far away in another part of the country! Even Christians (although greatly persecuted) are allowed to live in Gaza while there is no room at all for Jews, even though Jewish history of Gaza is twice than that of the whole Islamic Arab history! It simply boils down to a matter of political anti-Semitism and religious racism, period! Anyone who doesn’t embrace the Jewish expulsion of Gaza in light of the world’s goal of a Palestinian state is labeled an extremist! If you happen to be Jewish and still living in Gaza, you are not only an extremist but a criminal against a form of international law as well!

All kinds of political points can be made while debating over the Gaza expulsion of Jews. However, in the end, after all is said and done, and after all the political debate has been stated, there are a couple of events in history that will remain in comparison forever.
1. There were Jews who were forced to leave Nazi Germany and Nazi occupied countries simply because they were Jews.
2. There were Jews who were forced to leave Gaza and from the West Bank simply because they were Jews!

All of these anti-Jewish acts by the nations are just foundations of a larger Gentile goal. It is through these anti-Semitic wrongs that Palestinian pure evil can be granted sovereignty over the holy city of Jerusalem and its Temple Mount as a forever denial to the God of Israel and His covenant with the Jews. This is what makes the final status of Jerusalem and the Temple Mount so unique. It brings to head the full evilness of man against the righteousness of God! http://www.aish.com/jewishissues/middleeast/The_Face_of_Evil.asp

As long as Israel is committed to giving up their land to the Arabs instead of “Arab/Muslim transfer” out of the land, they will never have a true peace. It’s simply impossible. The way to true peace is the exact opposite of what happened in Gaza. The key ingredient to having “no-terror” in Israel is having “no-Muslims” in Israel plain and simple. I will go on record and guarantee that if there are no Muslims within Israel’s borders every last one of the suicide bombs will completely cease, all terrorist activity within Israel will halt, all riots will stop, the Security Fence will come down, Christians can come back to their homes in Bethlehem without fearing for their lives, and Israel will become the peaceful nation on earth named after its capital Jerusalem - City of Peace. However, this will never happen without God's intervention. The world is incapable of discerning right from wrong and righteousness from evil. To the nations of the world it is a great sin to transfer a brainwashed terrorist society out of an area where people (we’ll call them Jews) wish to actually live in peace. They can't see that giving the Jews some terror-free space in their own ancient land will benefit even the nations of the world greatly.

I have nothing against an Arab national or any other race of people living in the Israel worshiping the God of Israel (see Isaiah. 56: 6,7) but I have everything against any Muslim (regardless of nationally) living within Israel’s borders while worshiping a demonic god named Allah who vehemently hates the Jews and the God of Israel while seeking the destruction of both! Does this sound too political incorrect? If it does, then please chew on the reality of the following statement for a while:

"We succeeded, with Allah's grace, to raise an ideological generation that loves death like our enemies love life. We will not abandon the way of Jihad and Shahada [Martyrdom] as long as one inch of our holy land is in the hands of the Jews.
- Hamas election video, December, 2005

Oh yes, for the sake of sanity, these people need to be transferred out of land of Israel until the God of Israel deals with them! But like the Philistines during the biblical era, these Palestinians (who not by coincidence carries the same biblical name - see Joel 3:4 KJV) are there in the holyland that God may show His glory to the Gentile nations. Like it or not, because the Quartet is setting up the Palestinians in the area of the temple where the court of the Gentiles was but were not allowed to cross into the Holy of Holies lest they would be put to death, the Palestinians represent the entire Gentile world crossing that forbidden threshold!

According to the Bible, Gaza and all its cities are an inheritance to the tribe of Judah. Gaza has been a place of Jewish residence on and off throughout history since the Jewish conquest by Joshua of the land of Canaan. That means Gaza has had Jews living in it from a time that adds up to being over twice the length of time Islam itself has been in existence!

Also Judah took Gaza with its border, and Askelon with its border, and Ekron with its border.
-Judges 1:18

King Solomon’s empire controlled Gaza and the Maccabees re-took Gaza.
In those days Simon camped against Gaza, and besieged it round about; he made also an engine of war, and set it by the city, and battered a certain tower, and took it. -1 Maccabees 13:43

There actually has been several Jewish expulsions form Gaza with each time the Jews returning back to establish a Jewish presence there. The Jewish expulsions include:
Jews of Gaza being expelled by Roman emperor Gavinius in 61 AD, the Crusaders, Napoleon in 1799, Ottoman Turks, Arab rioters in 1929, and the Egyptian occupation in their War of Annihilation in 1948. Gaza was even the place where the infamous Jew named Sabbatai Zevi proclaimed himself to be the messiah at the persuasion of his right-hand man “Nathan of Gaza” (Nathan Benjamin ben Elisha ha-Levi Ghazzati) in 1665. One has to wonder why this Smyrna-born, deeply devoted Kabbalist Jew would have traveled so far from his home to only be so close to Israel’s ancient homeland to proclaim his messiahship if Gaza wasn’t indeed part of Israel’s ancient land?

Because God has given the land of Gaza to the Jews of the tribe of Judah for an eternal inheritance, there is no doubt in my mind that the Jews will again live in Gaza, but without the political resistance from the present world governments. Who knows, by the world leaders allowing a murderous Islamic system to occupy Judah’s inheritance, the stage maybe being set for God’s judgment to come into motion that will cause the Jews to inherit their land even without even a struggle?

I will gather all the nations and bring them down to the valley of Jehoshaphat, and I will enter into judgment with them there, on account of my people and my heritage Israel, because they have scattered them among the nations, and have divided up my land, -Joel 3:2

COUNTRIES AND COUNTIES FROM WHICH THE JEWS HAVE BEEN EXPELLED SINCE 250 CE:
YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .LOCATION

250 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Carthage
415 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Alexandria
554 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Diocese of Clement (France)
561 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Diocese of Uzzes (France)
612 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Visigoth Spain
642 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Visigoth Empire
855 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Italy
876 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sens
1012 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mainz
1182 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France
1182 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Germany
1276 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Upper Bavaria
1290 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - England
1306 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France
1322 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France (again)
1348 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Switzerland
1349 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hielbronn (Germany)
1349 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Saxony
1349 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hungary
1360 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hungary
1370 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Belgium
1380 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Slovakia
1388 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Strasbourg
1394 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Germany
1394 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France
1420 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lyons
1421 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Austria
1424 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Fribourg
1424 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Zurich
1424 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cologne
1432 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Savoy
1438 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mainz
1439 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Augsburg
1442 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Netherlands
1444 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Netherlands
1446 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bavaria
1453 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France
1453 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Breslau
1454 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Wurzburg
1462 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mainz
1483 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mainz
1484 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Warsaw
1485 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Vincenza (Italy)
1492 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Spain
1492 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Italy
1495 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lithuania
1496 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Naples
1496 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Portugal
1498 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Nuremberg
1498 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Navarre
1510 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Brandenberg
1510 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prussia
1514 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Strasbourg
1515 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Genoa
1519 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Regensburg
1533 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Naples
1541 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Naples
1542 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prague & Bohemia
1550 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Genoa
1551 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bavaria
1555 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pesaro
1557 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prague
1559 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Austria
1561 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prague
1567 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Wurzburg
1569 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Papal States
1571 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Brandenburg
1582 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Netherlands
1582 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hungary
1593 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Brandenburg, Austria
1597 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cremona, Pavia & Lodi
1614 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Frankfort
1615 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Worms
1619 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Kiev
1648 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ukraine
1648 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Poland
1649 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hamburg
1654 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Little Russia (Beylorus)
1656 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lithuania
1669 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Oran (North Africa)
1669 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Vienna
1670 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Vienna
1712 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sandomir
1727 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Russia
1738 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Wurtemburg
1740 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Little Russia (Beylorus)
1744 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prague, Bohemia
1744 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Slovakia
1744 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Livonia
1745 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Moravia
1753 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Kovad (Lithuania)
1761 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bordeaux
1772 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Deported to the Pale of Settlement (Poland/Russia)
1775 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Warsaw
1789 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Alsace
1804 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Villages in Russia
1808 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Villages & Countrysides (Russia)
1815 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L-beck & Bremen
1815 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Franconia, Swabia & Bavaria
1820 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bremen
1843 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Russian Border Austria & Prussia
1862 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Areas in the U.S. under General Grant's Jurisdiction
1866 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Galatz, Romania
1880s - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Russia
1891 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Moscow
1919 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bavaria (foreign born Jews)
1938-45 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Nazi Controlled Areas
1948 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Arab / Islamic Countries
2005.....................................GAZA
20??...................................West Bank

Articles on Gaza:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/02/gazas_rich_jewish_history.html

2009 Update:
The Obama Administration began its term in 2009 by pledging another 900 million dollars towards Israel's arch enemy - the Palestinians.
The General Secretary of the UN, Tony Blair of the Quartet, and former US President Jimmy Carter has all called for a US dialogue with Hamas!

Palestinian quotes concerning Gaza taken from journalist Aaron Klein:
"We are proud to turn these lands, especially these parts that were for so long time the symbol of occupation and injustice, like the synagogue [the former "Neve Dekalim" synagogue] into a military base and source of fire against the Zionists and the Zionists entity" - Muhammad Abdel-Al, spokesman for the "Popular Resistance Committees"

"The old (Jewish) settlements gave the Palestinians resistance enough space to have big training. We never had this space and these possibilities when the Zionists were in Gaza" - Abu Muhammad, Senior base leader of "Islamic Jihad"