Israel - The Chosen People

Obviously, there is a reason why the only nation that is still surviving from ancient times is the same nation that has been subjected to total annihilation time and time again! If you stop and ponder this fact for about thirty seconds you’ll get a glimpse of how mind-blowing this fact really is. No people ever tried to annihilate the ancient Canaanites. They just merged into another people with another identity, and today there is no trace of them as Canaanites. The same can be said about the Babylonians, Persians, Hittites, Assyrians, Philistines, Phoenicians, ancient Egyptians, and Romans. There is simply no trace of those people as a nation today. However, the other nations of the world have conducted attempt after attempt in trying to annihilate the nation of Israel, yet it has remained and is still among the modern nations that are present on the earth today.

The American writer Mark Twain (who never even saw the re-birth of the State of Israel among the nations) wrote the following statement concerning the Jews which is actually quite an endorsement of God’s covenant with Israel, being that Mark Twain was a Gentile atheist:

“The Egyptians , the Babylonians, and the Persian rose, filled the planet with sound and splendor, then faded to dream-stuff and passed away; the Greek and the Roman followed, and made a vast noise, and they are gone; other peoples have spring up and held their torch high for a time, but it burned out, and they sit in twilight now, or have vanished. The Jew saw them all, beat them all, and is now what he always was, exhibiting no decadence, no infirmities of age, no weakening of his parts, no slowing of his energies, no dulling of his alert and aggressive mind. All things are mortal but the Jew; all forces pass, but he remains. What is the secret of his immortality?”

The answer to Mark Twain’s question of Jewish immortality is actually quite simple and can be answered in two words. It's called an “eternal covenant”. All the other nations of ancient times did not have an eternal covenant, and therefore, there was no special purpose that they should remain throughout history as a nation as Israel has done. The Jewish nation is the messenger that brings to the Gentile world an everlasting message whereby as the messenger Israel must remain in order to give that message. In a since, the nation of Israel was to be the prophet-nation or the priestly-nation, hand picked by God to deliver His message to the rest of the nations. The Torah reveals that God wanted the Israelite nation to “lead” the world in the universal understanding God.

for this is your wisdom and your understanding in the sight of the nations, which shall hear all these statutes and say, Surely this great nation is a wise and understanding people. For who is a great nation whose God is coming near to them, as Jehovah our God is, in all our calling on him? - Deuteronomy 4:6,7

As with many of Israel’s righteous individual prophets such as, Isaiah and Jeremiah, the nations have sought to destroy Israel as a people even before Israel had even obtained the covenant. The first recorded, pre-covenant attempt of Jewish annihilation is found in the Bible involving the Pharaoh of Egypt around the year of 1435 BCE. (over 3400 years ago).

And he said, When you midwife the Hebrew women, and look on the birth stools, if it is a son, then you shall kill him. But if it is a daughter, then she shall live….
And Pharaoh charged all his people, saying, Every son that is born you shall cast into the river, and every daughter you shall save alive. -Exodus 1:15, 22

About a thousand years later, a second planed "Finial Solution" is recorded in the Bible. This time it involved a man named Haman who lived around the year 483 BCE.

And Haman said to king Ahasuerus, There is a certain people scattered abroad and dispersed among the people, in all the provinces of your kingdom. And their laws are different from all people, neither do they keep the king's laws. And it is not for the king's gain to allow them to live….
And the letters were sent by postal riders into all the king's provinces, to destroy, to kill, and to cause to perish, all Jews, both young and old, little children and women, in one day, on the thirteenth of the twelfth month, which is the month Adar, and to take what they owned for a prize. - Esther 3:8,13

Before I go any further, I would like to stop right here and take a swing or two at the anti-God, Bible scholars for just a moment. There are a lot of so-called Bible scholars who have their Ivy League-educated reasons for doubting the Bible as a historical record. However, spiritual evidence has a much greater impact in revealing what is truth and what isn’t the truth. For instance, read the words above in red from the book of Esther in which scholars will all agree was written at least well over 2600 years ago. Does the basic reading of these words in red from 2600 years ago concerning the Jewish people cause the reader to immediately think of a modern historical event concerning the same Jewish people?
.
If the story of Haman is just a myth or legend as scholars might claim, isn’t it a little strange that such a myth or legend is able to be greatly related to the greatest evil plot known to man at least 2600 years before it ever occurred? Read the words above from Haman again in red and then compare those words from the book of Esther with the following words in red from this modern era which is from another political leader who spoke at the Posen Conference on October 6, 1943 named Heinrich Himmler:
.
"I'm talking about the evacuation of the Jews, the evacuation of the Jewish race. This something that can be stated quite clearly; the Jewish race will be exterminated."
.
Since episodes in the Bible include the phenomenon of governments seeking Jewish annihilation that we still see today as well as all throughout history, it is not a far stretch to believe that the Bible contains divinely inspired writings concerning this chosen people who just so happens to be the only surviving nation to make it out of the ancient and into the modern.

Another aspect of this ancient account concerning Haman and the Jews occurred on October 16, 1946 when ten Nazis were hanged for their war crimes at the Nuremberg Prison. There were originally eleven Nazis set to be hanged that day but some Nazi-lover (probably a prison guard) slipped Hermann Goring a cyanide capsule which he used just two hours before his execution. Therefore, the remaining ten Nazis were put to death which seems to be reminiscent of the ten sons of Haman that were put to death in the Biblical account for plotting Jewish annihilation.

They also killed Parshandatha, Dalphon, Aspatha, Poratha, Adalia, Aridatha, Parmashta, Arisai, Aridai, and Vaizatha - the ten sons of Haman of Hammedatha the enemy of the Jews.
- Esther 9:7-10

What was even more striking was when Julius Streicher mounted the steps to the gallows where he was to be hung, he cried out: “And now I go to God”. He then stared at the witnesses facing the gallows and shouted: “Purimfest 1946!” The strange thing is that the Jewish holiday of Purim that Streicher referred to is the annual victory celebration that the Jews conduct in their victory over Haman! Furthermore, Purim is celebrated in the early spring and not in October in which Streicher was executed. No one really knows what caused Streicher to mention the Jewish festival and the current year as his last words on earth. My personal belief is that the evil spirit within Streicher that was yelling “Hail Hitler” just a few minuets before, knew of the spiritual connection between the Biblical account of Haman and his sons, and the ten men that were executed on that day.

When Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad spoke at the "World without Zionism" conference in Tehran on October 26, 2005, (World without Zionism, meaning: world without the God of Israel, Jews, and the land of Israel) and he stated that Israel was a “disgraceful blot” and that it should be “wiped off the map”. He also stated “Anybody who recognizes Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation's fury” and that “The Islamic world will not let its historic enemy live in its heartland.” The next day, Prime Minister Tony Blair responded to Ahmadinejad’s statements at a press conference at the Hampton Court by saying: “I have never come across a situation of the President of a country saying they want to wipe out, not that they have got a problem with, or an issue with, but want to wipe out another country.” I personally would like to ask Mr. Blair these three questions regarding his "surprised" response to Ahmadinejad:
1. How long have you been Prime Minister?
2. How old are you?
3. How "surprised" were you that it was the tiny nation of Israel that just so happened to be included in your very first experience in coming across such a situation where the president of a country was saying he wanted to wipe out another country?

Since it was just four years earlier in 2001 that the former Iranian president Hashemi Rafsanjani called for a Muslim state to annihilate Israel with a nuclear strike,* how was it that Mr. Blair being in his high government position, did not hear about Rafsanjani’s statement? Perhaps Mr. Blair was so preoccupied with promoting a Palestinian state that would later become Hamas ruled, that caused him not to have the time nor the desire to be concerned with such statements? Perhaps the "surprised" Mr. Blair should have been reading Article 15 of the Palestinian Charter of 1968 (which has never been amended as promised by the Palestinian Authority) which reads:

The liberation of Palestine, from an Arab viewpoint, is a national (qawmi) duty and it attempts to repel the Zionist and imperialist aggression against the Arab homeland, and aims at the elimination of Zionism in Palestine. Absolute responsibility for this falls upon the Arab nation - peoples and governments - with the Arab people of Palestine in the vanguard. Accordingly, the Arab nation must mobilize all its military, human, moral, and spiritual capabilities to participate actively with the Palestinian people in the liberation of Palestine. It must, particularly in the phase of the armed Palestinian revolution, offer and furnish the Palestinian people with all possible help, and material and human support, and make available to them the means and opportunities that will enable them to continue to carry out their leading role in the armed revolution, until they liberate their homeland.

Mr. Blair should also take the time to read what the political leaders in the Muslim world has stated openly within his very own lifetime concerning their mind set, goals, and political agendas towards “another country” that just so happens to be the same exact country that Ahmadinejad called for the destruction of. The following statements are just a few that the Muslim world has produced:

Egypt has decided to dispatch her heroes, the disciples of Pharaoh and the sons of Islam and they will cleanse the land of Palestine…There will be no peace on Israel’s borders because we demand vengeance, and vengeance is Israel’s death.
- Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser - August 31,1955

“I, as a military man, believe that the time has come to enter into a battle of annihilation.”
- Syrian Defense Minister Hafez Assad - May 20, 1967

“Our basic objective will be the destruction of Israel.”
- Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser - May 27,1967

“The existence of Israel is an error which must be rectified. This is our opportunity to wipe out the ignominy which has been with us since 1948. Our goal is clear --to wipe Israel off the map.” - President of Iraq Abdur Rahman Aref - May 30, 1967

It is not just the political leaders all over the Muslim world that has called for the destruction of Jews and the State of Israel. All throughout the Muslim culture anti-Israel expressions can be heard. Imams (leaders of prayer), Sheiks (chief of family, tribe or village), Muftis (judge of religious law), and militant leaders all over the Muslim world has called for the destruction of Jews and the State of Israel:

"Oh Allah, the Jews have transgressed all limits in their tyranny. O Allah, shake the ground under their feet, pour torture on them, and destroy all of them.”
- Sheikh Adb-al-Bari al-Thubayt - June 7, 2002 - sermon at the Holy Mosque of Medina, (broadcast on official Saudi television)

“Allah shall make the Muslim rule over the Jew, we will blow them up in Hadera, we will blow them up in Tel Aviv and in Netanyahu ….
We bless all those who educate their children to jihad and to Martyrdom, blessing be he who shot a bullet into the head of a Jew.”
Sermon broadcast on Palestinian Authority television - August 3, 2001

During the Gulf War in 1991, Saddam Hussein launched thirty-nine Scud missiles into Israel (who didn’t participate in the Gulf War fighting at all) hitting major population areas such as Tel-Aviv and Haifa. One has to wonder what was the reason population centers were targeted with such large missiles? It should never be forgotten what would have happened if Saddam had larger missiles with nuclear or biological warheads attached to them at the time? It is obvious that Saddam, as the president of a country that was a member of the United Nations, wanted the total annihilation of the State of Israel!

With all these expressions of Jewish / Israel annihilation among the entire Arab / Muslim world (which is truly a remarkable phenomenon when one stops and thinks about it, not to mention adding the actual events of the Holocaust along with them) one might wonder if the Bible has anything to say regarding this extraordinary human-world condition that causes the nations to continually seek out these historically annihilation-targeted people? Actually it does! The Bible even refers to the same bodies of land from where some of these Islamic desires of Jewish annihilation came from:

For behold, Your enemies make a tumult; And those who hate You have lifted up their head. They have taken crafty counsel against Your people, And consulted together against Your sheltered ones. They have said, "Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation, That the name of Israel may be remembered no more." For they have consulted together with one consent; [under Islam] They form a confederacy against You: The tents of Edom [southern Jordan] and the Ishmaelite [Arabs]; Moab [Jordan] and the Hagrites; Gebal, [in Lebanon] Ammon, [Jordan] and Amalek; Philistia [Lebanon] with the inhabitants of Tyre; [Lebanon] Assyria [Syria -Iraq] also has joined with them; They have helped the children of Lot. Selah. Deal with them as with Midian, [Saudi Arabia] As with Sisera, As with Jabin at the Brook Kishon, - Psalms 83: 2-9

Muslim Infighting / Against-Israel Uniting:
It is interesting fact that many of the Arab / Muslim nations and the different Islamic sects within those nations, has a long history of not getting along with each other. The Shiites and Sunnis powers have long histories of trying to obliterate the other. Iraq’s civil war is due to Sunni and Shiite struggle for power. Just in the last thirty years Iran and Iraq has tried for years to destroy each other in a holy war beginning in 1980. Muslim Egypt fought with Muslim Yemem (1962-67). The Palestinians has fought the Hashemite government of Jordan in a bloody religious war known as Black September. In his attempt to rule the Islamic world, Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait and fired Scud missiles into Saudi Arabia, not to mention gassing the Kurds within his own country who were also fellow Muslims. There has been an armed struggle between Lebanon and Syria for many years now involving assassinations of prominent leaders. And now, recently in the news, we hear about Fatah and Hamas killing each other in gruesome ways.

More extreme Islamic movements from within Muslim countries have fought less radical Muslim governments for power, sometimes even winning control over that country’s government. The Muslim Brotherhood that arose out of Egypt in the 1930s have fought the Egyptian government for many decades and has splintered off into other terrorist groups and have gone into other places of the Muslim world to fight the governments there, such as Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Arab populations in Israel, Al Queda in Saudi Arabia, Hezbollah in Iran, the Baath party in Iraq, and the Taliban in Afghanistan. However, with all of this war and strife within the Muslim governments, sects, and communities, there is one particular political agenda and religious doctrine that every Muslim nation, every Islamic religious sect, and every radical political power within the Islamic world, can agree on, hands down.
Would you like to take a guess as to what this all-in-agreement, political agenda, and religious goal just might happen to be? Here is a biblical hint: “Psalms 83”.

From the beginning (even many years before Israel’s statehood) and continuing until the present, the many Arab and Muslim nations that surround Israel, (though many times being enemies of each other) are bonded together in a spiritual union that seeks the destruction of Israel!

One perfect example of this spiritual phenomenon occurred on January 29, 2007 in the city of Eilat, Israel when a Palestinian suicide bomber murdered three Israelis at a bakery of all places. Palestinians murdering themselves in order to murder Israeli citizens was certainly nothing new in Israel, but the reason behind this particular suicide case gives insight into the spiritual thinking of Israel’s enemies rather than trying to cover them up by political claims.
.
Before the attack, it had been months before the last successful attack had been pulled off by the Palestinians due to their busyness of trying to kill each other over a political power struggle. The two parties that claimed responsibility - Islamic Jihad and the Al Aksa Brigades of Fatah, did not use their old line of justification claiming revenge for Israel taking one of their masterminds of suicide deployment. Instead, this suicide murderer was send into action that it might end weeks of infighting between Hamas and Fatah. They themselves knew that by focusing on Israel as the target, it would help decrease any Palestinian feudal aspirations caused by a political power push. Because they have an ability to hate Israel at a greater depth than they have the ability to hate themselves, answering their higher-calling of Jew-murder brings peace and calm among the different factions of the Jew-haters.

Ancient Words - Modern Words
I personally get goose bums and cold chills when I see the comparison between what the leading coordinator of the Arab/ Muslim War of Annihilation of 1967, Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser stated prior to the war, and what the ancient Hebrew book of Psalms stated concerning the enemies of Israel 3000 years ago:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“Our basic objective will be the destruction of Israel.” - May 27,1967
“The armies of Egypt, Jordan, Syria and Lebanon are poised on the borders of Israel….to face the challenge, while standing behind us are the armies of Iraq, Algeria, Kuwait, Sudan, and the whole Arab nation.” Egyptian President Gamel Abdel Nazzer - May 30,1967 A.D.

For behold, Your enemies make a tumult; And those who hate You have lifted up their head. They have taken crafty counsel against Your people, And consulted together against Your sheltered ones. They have said, "Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation, That the name of Israel may be remembered no more." For they have consulted together with one consent; - Psalms 83:2-5 - Approximately 600 -1000 BCE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These are not the only examples of world leaders expressing their desire to see the end of Jewish existence. Statements like these have echoed down through the centuries. Like the modern day Nasser, Pope Urban who initiated the Crusades, stated in 1096 almost word for word Psalms 83: “Let us first avenge ourselves on them and exterminate them from among the nations, so the name of Israel will no longer be remembered, or let them adopt out faith.”
.
There probably has been hundreds of thousands, if not millions of organized physical attacks on the Jewish people throughout the history of the Diaspora that has left millions of Jews either maimed or dead. Even as recently as July 2006, the Shiite faction of Hezbollah from the north of Israel and the Sunni faction of Hamas from Gaza, has sent close to four thousands of rockets deep within Israel seeking the killing and wounding of as many innocent Jewish people as possible. Even if the events of the Holocaust were left out, the fact still remains that there has always been a people on the earth seeking Jewish annihilation.

Grave Desecration
While the Jewish people are the most hated and most persecuted people living on the face of the earth, it must be noted that it isn’t just the living Jews who are continually persecuted. Oh yes, this world hatred for Jews is a very special hatred that is unprecedented in world history that even the dead are not immune. There have been more Jewish graves desecrated from around the world than any group of people who has been buried in the earth! Think of this: It is the Jews that hold such a record as to the most grave desecration, while at the same time maintaining one of the smallest population groups of the earth!
.
In the last few years in both Europe and in the United States there has been a barrages of Jewish grave desecration more than ever before, including before the rise of Nazism. One such example occurred on July, 24, 2006 where vandals broke into Holocaust memorial in Brussels. Using condoms and excrement of all things, these Jew-haters desecrated a urn and its ashes from the Auschwitz-Birkenau Nazi death camp. This act was the closest expression that these Jew-haters could come up with whereby acting out "the rape" of the Jewish-persecuted dead. I hope you can see the spiritual aspect of just how deep and dark anti-Semitism can run in a human soul. It's not just something political, it's very spiritual on the side of pure evil.

If you go to a cemetery anywhere in Europe which have their fare-share of Jewish grave sites, you will more than likely find swastikas and other vulgar signs painted on Jewish headstones. Why? It for the same reasons Jewish synagogues and other holy sites of the Jews have been desecrated throughout history. Jewish persecution (even the persecution of the their dead) is based upon spiritual reasons - they hate the God of Israel and anything that relates to Him. It is not a coincidence that in all the history of the world, the greatest crime and inhuman atrocities for a people to commit against another people was targeted directly at the Jews that we now call “the Holocaust”. The closest thing to persecuting God Himself in hatred is to persecute His chosen people.

Terrorism in Israel
I have personally visited Israel twice on short stays once in 1987 and again in 1997. My 1987 visit came a few weeks before the first Palestinian uprising know as the first intifada which focused on continuous attacks of killing Jews. However during both of my non-intifada visits there were terrorist attacks that left several Jewish people dead during the few days I was there. This wasn’t because of an extra ordinary coincidence that the only two visits that I have made to Israel thus far in my lifetime just happen to be when Israel just happened to be victims terrorist attacks. If I were to plan a ten day trip to Israel for anytime this year or any other year in the future, the chances would be extremely high that Jews would be murdered on the streets of Israel before I got on the plane for my fight home. The reason why is because Jews die because they are Jews almost on a bi-weekly basis in Israel. Seeing terrorism on both of my visits in such a small country made me realize just how bad the terrorist ordeal really is to the Jews living in Israel throughout the entire year!

Comparatively to size and population with the Untied States, the hundreds of attacks that has killed thousands of Jews in Israel is like having to deal with a 9/11 tragedy about every three weeks, not to mentions the tens of thousands attacks that have been averted due to Israel’s (world criticized) very tight security! Israel doesn’t fight wars for purposes of self-interest such as the United States has done in Viet Nam, Korea, and Iraq. All of their wars have been fought on the bases of survival and to avoid total annihilation. All of Israel’s war-time enemies have always been the aggressor and not having to worry about Israel annihilating them if they should lose, while Israel having to always be the defender, fights with the knowledge that a lost would result in their total annihilation. Yet the world including the United States has the audacity to criticize Israel for putting of a security wall to protect their citizens! Every terrorist attacked on Israel and its Jews, whether a suicide bombing like the one in Netanya at the Passover Seder on March 27, 2002 that killed 22 and wounded 140, or whether its news of a Kassam rocket striking a Jewish school in Sderot as it did in September 2005 and again in May 2006, or whether it’s the thousands of Ketyasha and Fajr rockets that Hezbolla sent into northern Israel with the aim at killing as many Jewish civilians as possible, I am reminded of the scriptures that speaks of these very events:

Yea, for Your sake we are put to death all the day long; we are counted as sheep for the slaughter. - Psalms 44:22

The ancient Jews of the Bible experienced 3,000 years ago what every Jew in the world has had to deal with both now and since the time of the writing of the 44th Psalm, which is simply that the God-haters of this world loves dead Jews. The fact is that the more spiritual the Jew is, the more hatred arises in the anti-Semite’s soul thereby causing more joy and celebration when they are slaughtered for the sake of God as it states in the 44th Psalm. There are many peoples of the world that have endured persecutions for religious and nonreligious political reasons. However, there can only be one nation of people that is the most hated out of all of them, and that one nation just happens to be the only nation to ever be defined in terms of its religion. Israel (the single state for Jews) is the only nation where even its nonreligious members are attacked and murdered for his / her religion! How about that for being chosen?

As Albert Einstein proved that there was for every action, a reaction, so to was there a reaction of the Jews from the action of the Gentile world persecuting them. In God’s perfect dichotomy system, the Jews had to be persecuted by the Gentile nations in order to survive as a nation after the Diaspora. This allowed God to punish Israel for her sins that caused the exile to begin with and it also allows God the punish the Gentile nations as well for hating God’s Torah and for going beyond their call.

Thus saith the LORD of hosts; I am jealous for Jerusalem and for Zion with a great jealousy.
And I am very sore displeased with the heathen (Gentiles) that are at ease: for I was but a little displeased, and they helped forward the affliction. - Zechariah 1:14,15

Persecution also has forced Israel to embrace the idea of God’s deliverance at the End of Days. The historical and ever-present attacks on a Jew living in exile and away from their ancient land of promise, is literally a spiritual call to come back to the land of Israel and to come back to the covenant by which they can only find true peace.

…and they shall be safe in their land, and shall know that I am the LORD, when I have broken the bands of their yoke, and delivered them out of the hand of those that served themselves of them. And they shall no more be a prey to the heathen, neither shall the beast of the land devour them; but they shall dwell safely, and none shall make them afraid. - Ezekiel 34:27,28

This is why the Holocaust as bad as the worst atrocity known to mankind, was a major birth pain for spiritual Israel to awaken, and it was the leading reason why there is a national State of Israel in the world today. As the End of Days approach it is spiritually beneficial to keep your eyes on these chosen people. For at the End of Days this chosen nation, while in their rightful place, will no longer be the whipping boy of the gentile nations, but will again be the spiritual leaders to the knowledge of the God - the God of Israel.

Yea, many people and strong nations shall come to seek the LORD of hosts in Jerusalem, and to pray before the LORD. Thus saith the LORD of hosts; In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that God is with you. - Zechariah 8:22,23

The Moderately Assimilated and Alan Dershowitz

Jewish moderates are actually more dangerous than the fully assimilated ones. Common sense itself will naturally reveal that something is dreadfully wrong with the concepts from the far Left. When liberal Jews seek to destroy the Jewish nation and Jewish heritage in any form or fashion it simply goes against the natural laws of self-preservation.

However it takes something more than just common sense to determine to wrongs of a moderate. It takes spirituality, conservative spirituality. The moderates base their beliefs totally on self-reasoning but are completely depleted of spirituality. Any spiritual issues are first ran through their concepts of reason rather than any spiritual concepts, inspirations, or revelations in their lives.

The mind is a battle ground between reason (knowledge) and faith (spirituality). The first biblical battle we see between reason and faith is depicted as "good verses evil" in the Garden of Eden. Adam was a being formed in the image of God whose breath came from God’s own breath. Therefore, the Bible tells us that Adam was in essence a “naturally” spiritually being. In order to keep the source of his natural spirituality by which he was created flowing smoothly, a spiritual based commandment was given to him not to partake of the Tree of Knowledge.

This commandment was given simply because the source of Adam's spiritual life by which he lived before his fall, and a life lived from the source from the Tree of Knowledge could not be mixed. Eve, who wasn’t around in woman form when this spiritual commandment was first given to Adam was well aware of it by the time the serpent came to tempt her. She even repeated this commandment to the serpent. The serpent did not use physical force to get Eve to partake of the forbidden Tree of Knowledge because physical force would not have worked in causing Eve to willfully disobey the commandment, which was the main motive of the serpent. Instead, he offered a reasoning to replace her spirituality and devotion to the spiritual commandment.

The serpent didn’t deny that there was a God who created all things or that God really gave them the commandment of not to eat of the Tree of Knowledge. He just got Eve to inject reason into the commandment itself that offered an alternative perspective to what God really wanted! He was basically setting himself up as a spokesman for God through the method of self-reason. In my view, the serpent was the first Left-winger while Eve became the first moderate that caused the spiritually conservative-Adam to fall.

Most Jewish moderates will almost always have a form of tainted spirituality. I say that because when you hear them speak they will always stop short of taking all what God has spoken through Moses and the rest of the Hebrew prophets. Stopping short of all that God requires is really the whole concept of being a moderate. Otherwise they would be considered a religious conservative.

Whenever they do stop short of the full extent of biblical principles they will always replace the biblical portion that they willfully will fail to follow all the way through, with a form of reasoning reasoning that sounds good and decent. For instance, the idea of taking something, and then giving something in return, only seems fair and just. Wouldn’t any other type of reasoning show a sense of greed?

When a moderate injects this type of reasoning into the words of God it not only dilutes the whole message and principle of God, but it changes the whole concept of God into something that is man-based instead of something that is God-based. Following the serpent’s plan of action of how he deceived Eve, the moderates will suggest a reasonably sounding “better” idea for man than what God has spoken. In the end, the moderate world (which is a realm that is by nature outside the realm of righteousness) will seek the destruction of true righteousness itself, simply because the two worlds are unable to be mixed together.

Alan Dershowitz is a classic Jewish moderate. Though he sees himself as a liberal, his hardcore stance on some conservative issues and his exposing of far-Left liberals makes him a moderate, even leaning towards conservatism. The Israel-hating, anti-Semites from both Jewish and Gentiles groups hates him tremendously, and targets him on bogus allegations whenever they get a chance. I appreciate and believe half the things that Alan Dershowitz says concerning Israel and the Palestinians, but the other half of the things Dershowitz says makes me want to pull my hair out of my head in anger. His wit and ability to put in perspective the anti-Israel injustices and the Palestinian terrorism is like no other that I have seen.

His book “The Case for Israel” (now a video documentary) was a national best seller and I have to say, it is well worth reading. I even placed it in the "great book" section of this blog site. I especially like the way Dershowitz has recently taken on the Hamas-loving former president Jimmy Carter and his Hamas-loving lies. However, in his very next book entitled “The Case for Peace” Dershowitz starts out using a biblical passage in the introduction (something he didn’t do in his prior book “The Case for Israel”) which demonstrates Dershowitz willingness as a moderate to “reason out” God’s divine plan for Israel.

In his book “The Case for Peace” he gives his reasons for a Palestinian state, a divided Jerusalem, a Jew-free West Bank, a Jew-free Gaza, and the "right-of-return" of some Palestinians into the Jewish state of Israel instead of a new state of Palestinian-filled / Jew-free "Palestine".

I don’t mean to pick on Alan Dershowitz more than other well known Jewish moderates, but because he speaks for most moderates from both Jews and Gentiles (being than he writes best sellers and all) I want to answer some of his claims through a religious-conservative-extremist prospective. I want to show that because a moderate perspective along with the far Left perspectives, are automatically separated from the godly justice, they will always lead to an unjust and insane result.

Dershowitz reasoning is of course something that sounds somewhat fair when viewed without any spiritual insight as the title of his book, “The Case for Peace” would indicate. Who could argue over a legitimate-sounding case for peace? Because Dershowitz has lowered God to an object that is subjected to man’s reasoning, his concept of righteous thinking would sound something like this:
“Surely” God wants peace in land of Israel.
“Surely” God hates war where even innocent children are dying.
“Surely” the Israelis should share the land where Arabs have lived for such a long period of time.
“Surely” Jerusalem can be the worship center for both Jews and Arabs alike since we are all God’s children of Abraham.
“Surely” you won’t die if you eat of the Tree of Good and Evil.

Dershowitz, like most Jewish moderates, views the Bible as an important piece of heritage of the Jewish people but that is as far as he will go with it because he has no spiritual backbone. This is the main reason why he can suggest such give-away proposals concerning half of Jerusalem and most or all of the holy Temple Mount. These things simply have no spiritual significant to him! Therefore, he is willing to force religious Jews to depart from what is sacred to them as long as he gets what is important him in his moderate-reasoning world. In this Dershowitz becomes a selfish Jew who favors the human workings of a democracy over any and all human devotion to their creator.

The reason and foundation of why the Palestinians are so insanely evil in their methods and political movements is because they are direct enemies to God’s chosen people. It’s a spiritual thing! If the moderates would only stop and think that the reason why the Palestinians are terrorist minded from small children on up is because they don’t belong to the land in the first place, just as virus outside its natural habitat becomes vicious against its host. The more the Palestinians resist Israel, the more engulfed into evil and insanity they become. Therefore, a moderate will try to mix darkness with light by giving into the persistence of Palestinian evil instead up standing up and seeking the total annihilation of this insane evil came hail or high water! A Palestinian martyr should never go his Allah with Jewish lives under his belt and a UN membership plaque in his hand!

A good biblical example of a Jewish moderate today is the spies that Moses sent out to spy on the promised land of Canaan who returned with a reasoning of why the land couldn’t be inherited. These spineless spies were perfectly content on not pursuing any more land. They had rather stayed right there in the wilderness or returned to their house of bondage in Egypt, letting go to any held promise of their God. It is only those who are totally dedicated through thick and thin that God will give honor simply because they honor God. However, moderates do not have it within them to stand so tall. They will knowing accept an evil scheme that they can live with as long as certain conditions of their self-desire are met. The end result is that evil triumphs with the blessings of a moderate.

Case and Point: Dershowitz can see the insanity coming out of the Palestinians on a daily basis and has even written extensively about it. Yet he is willing to a give this religiously insane people a recognized state because of world pressure, and not because of what is obviously right and wrong with giving them a state. In order to fight off any conviction of his spiritual spinelessness, he will turn against the ones who do hold up for what is right come what may, as he does here in this following quote from the book "Case for Peace":

“Some of the extremist use language that parallels the hate speech used by anti-Israel zealots. Take Rabbi David Samson, who said , “Their [the Arabs] children are born with Molotov cocktails in their hands. These are a people as unfeeling as jackals."

Dershowitz is saying that any suggestion by a religious person that Palestinian children are born with Molotov cocktails (fire bombs) in their hands is just as guilty of unfounded hatred as the antisemitic Jew-haters are. Now notice how good that might sound to other non-religious persons. It sounds like Dershowitz has really gotten his act together as he stands up for what is right and on the side of righteousness. He seems quick to point out any unjust rhetoric on either side of the conflict, be it Israeli or Palestinian. That’s what God would want, right? This kind of logic and seemingly unselfish compromise made the moderate Israelis vote for the Kadima party in the 2006 elections.

The only problem with Dershowitz’s example of an equality of “hate speech” between a rabbi and anti-Semites is that Rabbi Samson’s quote is not some hate speech from an extremist as Dershowitz tries to paint him, but is in fact a very truthful and factual statement coming from someone who is not blinded by the world’s “can’t-we-all-just-get-along” moderate-centric position.

While no human child can possibly be born with anything in their hands, the Palestinian children are the closet among all the children of the world at living up to such a figure of speech. There is some truth to the one-liner jokes: “ What does the sign say above the nursery in a Palestinian maternity ward? The answer, "Live Ammunition". Also, “a little Palestinian girl says to her mommy, "After Abdul blows up, can I have his room?" Ha-ha, very funny right? But one has to wonder why there are such jokes to begin with? The non-humorous sad part is, that it isn’t long after the Palestinian children are born that some sort of weapons for the purpose of a Jew-killing jihad are placed in their tiny hands. A quick Internet trip to "Palestinian Media Watch" will demonstrate this > http://www.palwatch.org/.

As far as Rabbi Samson stating that the Palestinians are unfeeling as jackals, I have to disagree with such a statement for the simple fact that jackals have more “natural” feelings towards the Jews than most Palestinians, be it Fatah or Hamas! I don’t know of any jackals who sends their offspring on suicide-murderous missions and then passes out candies to celebrate their murdering-suicide successes! In fact, the Palestinians could actually learn a decent thing or two from jackals! I maybe considered “one of those extremist” by Dershowitz for making such a statement, but given the choice of either spending the night with a den of jackals or walking the streets of Ramallah or Jenin as a Israel-state supporting Jew, Dershowitz’s choice I’m sure, would be the company of jackals.

In his denial of the Jewish law (Halachah) namely "din rodef" meaning, "law of pursuer" that allowed a Jew to kill a fellow Jew if Jewish lives and property are at sake. This law was originally set forth by Moses Maimonides in the twelfth century and upheld in March 2002 by Rabbi Avigdor Neventzal of Jerusalem, Dershowitw had this to say:
“What these narrow-minded religious warmongers don’t seem to understand is that if their dangerous misinterpretation of Jewish law were correct - which it is not - that would be the strongest argument for rejecting Jewish law itself. A religious law that forbids territorial compromise in the interests of peace, or that justifies the murder of an elected leader who is seeking peace, is not a law worth following or even studying. Their baseless interpretation is, in the end, a self-defeating argument against the relevance and eternal validity of Jewish law. …Jewish law does not praise those who save an acre of land at the coat of human lives.

What Dershowitz willfully fails to understand is that any ruling of Jewish law has to be based on the principles of the Torah itself just like any case-law in the United States has to be based on the principles of the US Constitution. The Torah, as well as the prophets are not subject to some democratic vote or a multi-government U.N. resolution! He does not take into consideration that the Torah by which all aspects of Judaism, Jewish identity, the nation of Israel, and Zionism are all founded upon, in no way permits the giving away of any part of the land of Israel in the interest of peace or for any other reason whatsoever!

Dershowitz seems to suggest that if any Jewish law seems to suggest such “extreme” principles, the law would therefore be a law not worth studying much less applying to Jewish life. Maybe as a law professor at Harvard, Dershowitz should take the time to consider all of the Law of Moses and the words of the prophets and not just pick and chose verses he can make fit into his Torah denying moderate world before passing any judgment on Jewish Law according to his own personnel view. According to Dershowitz’s description of a “narrow minded religious warmonger” Moses and Joshua would definitely fit his bill!

By little and little I will drive them out from before thee, until thou be increased, and inherit the land. And I will set thy bounds from the Red sea even unto the sea of the Philistines, and from the desert unto the river: for I will deliver the inhabitants of the land into your hand; and thou shalt drive them out before thee. Thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor with their gods.- Exodus 23: 30-32

When YHVH thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou;
And when YHVH thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them: - Deuteronomy 7:1,2

The eternal God is thy refuge, and underneath are the everlasting arms: and he shall thrust out the enemy from before thee; and shall say, Destroy them. - Deuteronomy 33:27

Throughout the entire Hebrew Bible there is not one single time where God instructed Israel to make a peace treaty with her enemies or to settle for a "cubit less" of the entire land God originally promised to Israel. The prophets that followed Moses confirmed time and time again throughout the Jewish Scriptures that Israel would return to the land and win in victorious battles against her enemies at the End of Days.

Nowhere in Biblical prophecy is there a prophesied event of Israel making any kind of a peace treaty with her vicious enemies and share the promised land for the sake of a false peace while appeasing a false non-Israelite god such as one like the Arabian moon deity named Allah. That kind of revelation and logic is anti-Torah, anti-prophecy, and given the Palestinian nature and history, anti-common sense.

If someone insinuates that these scriptures above are still God’s desire and commandments for Israel today; to not give up one inch of the land that was promised to them by the God of Israel in ancient times, and that Israel is obligated to never make peace with the murderous Palestinians or any other gentile people, then they are labeled an extreme extremist. I would love for these Jewish moderates to answer the question and then back up their answer with Jewish scripture, as to whether or not God Himself is an extremist based on what the prophets of Israel declaration of God’s own words, and if the biblical views themselves are considered too extreme?

They will always respond that a man cannot know what God thinks as if to say, “The Bible was written for nothing in pertaining to modern times, so therefore my educated democratic modern moderate views are just as good and even more realistic than that of the ancient writings and views of the Bible." Moderates have the ability to understand the insanity of the Left and Far Left, but are left in the dark when it comes to spiritual insight involving political matters. Only someone with a spiritual sense can truly imagine how harsh the spiritual Moses would be against a Palestinian state and everything that the moderates of the world are expecting Israel to abide by if he were alive and on the earth today!

Dershowitz becomes “Harvard spiritual-stupid” in his book "Case for Peace" by using his education to reason that the answers to the Middle East conflict is "compromise". Because he doesn’t use spiritual discernment, he is capable of believing that the Palestinians are ready and willing to make peace and recognize Israel, but becomes blinded from seeing that the Palestinians can not and will not accept something so unIslamic and so against the words of Mohammad as a Jewish state.

"Thou wilt certainly find the most violent of people in enmity against the believers (Muslims) to be the Jews and idolaters." - Koran, sura 5:82

It is just plain willfully ignorant to believe that the Palestinians will forsake their Islam in order to make peace with the most abhorred people in Islam. Article 13 of Hamas' covenant states this clearly: "For renouncing any part of Palestine means renouncing part of the religion."
If Dershowitz had any spiritual discernment at all, he would realize that anytime there is a conflict between good and evil, or right and wrong, only bad things come about from any type of compromise. If you mix muddy and clear water the result will always be the same - more muddy water.

Any type of reward to terrorism in the name of "compromise-for-peace" can only sow the seeds for more terrorism in greater quality and quantity expressions. Unless the Palestinian cancer is totally taken out of the body of Israel and not just reduced, it will continue to multiply and spread until the death of Israel results. Case and point: there have been far more rockets attacks launched against Israel coming out of Gaza within the first year after the Israelis pulled out of Gaza than between 1949-1967. No matter how many terrorist have been foolishly released from Israeli prisons in the name of peace, the rockets still continue to fly into Israel more and more.
The compromising of Gaza on the basis of moderately hoping for peace has resulted in vacant Jewish community areas now being use for rocket-launch pads to strike at other Jewish cities inside the so-called U.N. green-line!

However, if the pro-Torah / pro-prophecy, biblical view of ridding Gaza of all Muslim Arabs (preferably by transfer) and replaced with Jews were to occur, I will personally guarantee that there would be no more terrorist rocket firings from Gaza, and absolutely no terrorism acts of any kind would occur within or around the whole of Gaza. But this guarantee of being terrorist-terrorism free is just too extreme for the moderates to handle, while they will support the forcing of Israeli Jews to put up with rockets hitting their houses and elementary schools.

In the eyes of the moderates, transferring a terrorism-natured people who religiously follow a "strike terror in their hearts" Allah-god ideology (see sura 8:12) so they can't express their terrorism tendencies, is consider by the moderates to be inhuman and extreme! However, allowing for the murder of innocent bystanders, including children, via Qussam rocket fire and other means is not considered too extreme in any sense of the word!

Dershowitz’s claim: "Mainstream Israelis and mainstream Palestinians, along with their respective governments, are now largely on the same side: they all want peace, compromise, and a two-state solution….With regard to this conflict most Israelis and many Palestinians are on the same side-the side of peace."

My answer: The Palestinian minority (the non-Hamas group) and the mainstream Israelis (the Kadima crowd) are willing to compromise for a two-state solution for different reasons. Deep within the hearts of the mainstream Israelis no desire can be found for the total annihilation of the Palestinian people. They just want the conflict to end once and for all. However, deep within the hearts of the mainstream Palestinians lays a deep desire for the total annihilation of the Israeli people. To them, the State of Israel is Al Nakba (the catastrophe) that oppresses the people and must be gotten rid of at all cost.

They are bound to this mindset for they are taught and brain washed to hate and kill Jews from their youth for crying out loud! When a Palestinian youth soccer team is named after a Jew-killing martyr, that should tell the moderates just how insane these people are and just what they deserve, but it doesn't. Not only that, I would love for Dershowitz or any of the rest of the moderates to explain to me the Middle East peace process along with the Hudaybiyya Treaty, and how the two can in no way be compared as Arafat suggested that they indeed were, on May 10, 1994 in Johannesburg, South Africa.

The mainstream Israelis are actually willing to sacrifice land (for reasons even I can’t understand) that is heavily connected with their ancient religious heritage in hopes of achieving peace with a people that has savagely murdered thousands of their fellow men, women, children, and infants in cold blood. The so-called moderate Palestinians of the Fatah party (who have murdered more Israeli Jews than Hamas has, I might add) are willing to at least give lip-service (as Arafat, their beloved and revered party leader did) to recognize Israel in order to negotiate under the win-win roadmap plan for Palestinians. They do this in order to advance towards their overall goal which is definitely not living along side Israel in peace! That will only occur in President Bush's mind or any other future US President that embraces the UN globalist movement!

This moderate Palestinian goal is the same as Hamas’ goal and has not changed since the start of the Six Day War, which has been and always will be, the complete destruction of the State of Israel, and for all of Palestine to live under Islamic rule. Fatah and Hamas only differ on whether to be discrete under a roadmap peace plan or to be open for all the world to see their Israeli-Jewish hatred. The ruling government of Hamas had chosen the latter. Even after Hamas, in keeping in line with their prophet, broke their own Hudaybiyya type treaty with Fatah in 2007 and took over all of Gaza, (showing their true nature for covenant breaking) there were still ignorant moderates everywhere such as Jimmy Carter and Tony Blair calling for peace talks between Israel and Hamas.

Abbu Abbas is considered and viewed by the world powers as the poster boy of Palestinian moderates. The world media refers to this devil as a moderate time and time again on their news wires. President Bush called him “A man of peace” upon his active role in merging Hamas in with Fatah to form a coalition. I’ll be the first to tell you that he really is the very best the Palestinian people has to offer the world as their moderate leader. Yet this moderate poster boy (whom President Bush has also called a" reformer" has explicitly:
1. Denied the Holocaust.
2. Suggested that there was a connection between the Nazis and the Zionists during the Second World War.
3. Has blamed the “Zionist” (as do the neo-Nazi white supremacists) for prompting the Nazis into committing their Holocaust deeds.
4. Stated that a crime was committed against the Palestinians in 1948 during Israel’s celebration of Independence.
5. Praised suicide murders for bringing about the Jewish withdraw from Gaza and calling them “martyrs” that have entered the Garden of Eden.
6. Declared the Palestinians who are serving tens of life sentences in Israeli prisons for their involvement in murdering Israeli civilians as “our heroes”.
7. Demanded that Palestinians descendants have a right of flood Jewish Israel (not a new state of Palestine) which he knows very well that it would undermine and destroy Israel as a Jewish nation.
8. Did absolutely nothing as a Palestinian elected president to stop or even slow down the Qussam rockets and gun fire from spewing out of Gaza towards near-by Israeli towns and villages right after Israel departed from Gaza.
9. Helped finance the 1972 Munich Massacre either directly and indirectly.
10. Has not even attempted to change the Palestinian covenant that declares the liberation (through an terrorist-style armed struggle) of all of what is known to Palestinians as “all of Palestine” -meaning all of Israel!
11. Asked for the release of hundreds of Palestinians terrorists serving time in Israeli prisons, including the ones with blood on their hands!
12. Never ridiculed, admonished, or refuted Iran’s president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in his Jew hatred, his Holocaust denial, or his outspoken desire to wipe Israel off the map.

Yet with all of this against Abbas, it was the moderate Jews in Israel who were more than willing to place their lives, trust, hopes, and dreams of peace, in the hands of such a man as Abu Abbas, instead of relying on the God of the Bible. They are willing to throw vast amounts of money and land that God has reserved for Israel, as an “offering” to this evil leader and his evil people. Since biblical times until the present, the Jews (especially the Israelis) for the most part have not lost their ability to be a stiff-necked people (a people that does not look back at their origins) when it comes to following the divine covenant set forth by God of Israel.

Continuing with Dershowitz’s above quote:
"The other side consist of Palestinians extremist who will never accept a Jewish state of Israel no matter how tiny, Israeli extremist who will never accept a Palestinian state no matter how tiny."

My answer in two parts:
1. Again, Dershowitz’s moderate blindness causes him to fail at seeing that there is probably less than a hundred Palestinians out of millions (not just so-called Palestinian extremist) that would fully endorse from their heart, Israel as a Jewish state. If given a straight down-the-line choice of there being in existence a Jewish state of Israel or not, 99.99% of all Palestinians would vehemently support the doing away with Israel all together. I know that, and Dershowitz knows that, and anybody with one eye and half-sense knows that to be truth of the matter! This is why Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad can so confidently suggested that there should be a Palestinian vote on whether or not there should be a state of Israel in the region as he defended his anti-Israel / holocaust-denying proclamations in the now famous Mike Wallace (his last) interview in August 2006.

It is only political maneuvering towards the total destruction of Israel that causes any Palestinian from any party, (including the Palestinian terrorist-enter-paradise proclaiming Abbu Abbas) to yell “peace talks”. To believe something different is simply and willfully being totally out of touch with reality. There is not one single ounce of Jewish hatred that has changed from Palestinian concepts and motivation since the time before the Six Day War, nor will there ever be as long as the influence of Islam prays on the minds of the Palestinians. The only thing that has changed is Palestinian political maneuvering in seeking the desired goal that they have had even before Israel became a state!

Because Dershowitz cannot see the spiritual aspects of the Middle East conflict as a whole, he therefore foolishly reasons that if the political situation returned to the conditions prior similar to the Six Day War that there would not be another Six Day War. That maybe what they teach in a political science class at Harvard, but Harvard is incapable of acknowledging the evil motivations of the human heart on a spiritual level. Again, moderates like Dershowitz function in the realm of reason while being spiritually depleted of any concepts of spirituality .

2. Will “God Himself” accept a Palestinian state no matter how small of one given what is based on the Jewish scriptures? If not, does that also make God Himself an extremist? If so, is the so-called Israeli extremist wrong for being extremist? And if God is an extremist, doesn’t that make the moderates who are not extremist, anti-God, or God-like? Oh how I can just hear the moderate excusing themselves by responding to these questions by stating: “No one can know what God thinks” as if to say it is impossible for God to reveal man His thoughts and will.

If by chance, any moderates would suggest that God of Israel would desire a Palestinian state within the borders outlined in the Bible, of which is clearly preserved for Isaac's offspring, I beg for any such clear and concise scriptural proof that allows any Jew, anywhere or at anytime, to give any of their land-of-inheritance in the name of peace of all things to their most vicious enemy! And don’t give me some willfully-ignorant moderate religious peace philosophy where it has to be read between the lines according to a liberal off-the-wall interpretation. Give it to me straight from the Torah and the prophets of Israel mouths! Go ahead and try Mr. Moderate, I double dog dare you to find such a land-for-peace supporting scripture! Write me a comment with your scripture on this blog.

Dershowitz claim: "The only guarantee of peace in the region is a qualitatively superior Israeli military deterrent.Whenever an Arab nation, or a combination of Arab nations, had believed itself capable of destroying Israel militarily, there had been war. Whenever Israel’s military superiority has been clear, there has been no war."

My answer given in two parts:
1. That is a very good and true analysis by which I fully and totally agree. However, I find a little problem with Dershowitz making such a statement. Dershowitz stated earlier in his book "Case for Peace" that, “Mainstream Israelis and mainstream Palestinians, along with their respective governments, are now largely on the same side: they all want peace, compromise, and a two-state solution.”

If this is the case, why would Dershowitz declare that “only guarantee of peace” as quoted above, be a “superior Israeli military deterrent” when you have mainstream Palestinians and their respective government are on the same side as mainstream Israeli and their respective government? With the all the “mainstream” Palestinians running around all over Gaza and the West Bank, Israel should only have to rely on their “mainstream” negotiation skills and not a superior military, right Mr. Dershowitz?

2. If the Palestinians still holds a tendency to go to war with Israel at any given time that they feel capable of destroying Israel, (as apparently Dershowitz believes they have never deviated from while advocating for Palestinian statehood) why should the Palestinians receive any land whatsoever? Would giving the Palestinians a state help support or reduce to chances of a Palestinian victory in the ever-possible, all-out future war with Israel? If so, what are the moderates who are advocates land-for-peace, really setting the nation of Israel up for? I would think that even through a moderate non-biblical reasoning, the Palestinians should not receive land or aid in any form or fashion until they can prove beyond any shadow of doubt that they can be trusted just the same (and not one ounce less) as Israel can be trusted. Is there anything unjustly wrong with this reasoning?

If the Palestinians had military superiority over Israel as much as Israel has military superiority over them now, what would happen? Until the absolute honest answer to this question and without any doubt whatsoever is: “the exact same political willingness for peace that Israel has shown the Palestinians for the last sixty years” the Palestinians shouldn’t receive a rusted-out penny of aid or the scrapings from a piece of gravel from the ancient land of Israel! Let me ask again, did I suggest something unjustly or one-sided wrong? Did I just express an extremist view or what? Did I just go beyond all boundaries of common sense? What part of "too-extremism" don’t I understand?

Would making the Palestinians prove their peacefulness be way, way, too much of a burden to put on these, same-side of peace, mainstream Palestinians? The sad part is that these moderates know very well that the Palestinians will never have it within themselves to recognize Israel as a sovereign Jewish state that is considered Waqf Islamic land, that they can have peace with. Yet these moderates push, and keep pushing for these Palestinian devils to have a state, (and a terrorist state at that) right beside peaceful Israel!

I know what I’m saying makes absolute perfect sense. Just looking at the Palestinians’ history speaks volumes of what they will continued to do in the future. Terrorists are like rabid dogs who can’t change their nature without a nature change. A Palestinian Islamic-fascist can no more peel off his suicide belt than a tiger can peel off its stripes. The problem is that any government position that requires the Palestinian leaders to go against their Islamic nature and accept the state of Jewish Israel, literally goes far beyond the perimeters of the intended goal of the Saudi Arabian devised and United Nations-supporting, roadmap plan, which in their minds is the first steps towards the total destruction of Israel! Yet the United States continues to insist on creation of a Palestinian state come hail, high winds, or high water.1 It seems in the eyes of the United States that it is the United Nations that is the only “authorized” organization that is able to set the guidelines for true justice, common sense, and world opinion.

Dershowitz claim: "Nor is it out of the question that someday Hamas might gain control over the Palestinian government, either by means of a coup, an election, or some such combination. Israel cannot be asked to accept a fully militarized Hamas state on its vulnerable borders."

My answer:
Its interesting to note that Dershowitz’s book “A Case for Peace” came out just before the Palestinian election in January, 2006 when the entire world (including Dershowitz himself) expected the Fatah party to win over the party that was recognized by the US State Department as a “terrorist organization”. Oh how the United States, United Nations, European Union, and all the moderate Kadima-voting Jews in Israel were so hoping for the innocent, terrorist-free Fatah party to win, so that the only chance for peace in their minds - the peace process could continue. Oh how shocked the world was to learn that a Palestinian people as a whole, overwhelmingly elected a party that is more anti-Semitic and more devoted towards killing Jews than that of the Nazis!

For Hamas to actually win in a democratic free-election just like Hitler did in 1932 should be a massive wake-up call for any government supporting a Palestinian state. Hamas not only won big-time at the polls, but their victory made a pro-terrorist statement for all the world to see that it was the Palestinian people as a whole who voted this evil-terrorist organization into office! There were however a few Jews and non-Jews alike who were not surprised by this Hamas grand victory. These people who were not surprised like the rest of the world were known by the rest of the surprised world, as pro-Israel (non-moderate) extremist! Go figure.

Notes:
1. Speaking of hail, high winds, and high water, did you notice that in September 2005 as thousands of religious Jews in Gaza were being expelled and displaced from their homes, millions of Americans were being expelled and displaced from their homes as well, due to the greatest natural disaster (acts of God) in US history? Coincidence? I, as an extremist, extremely don’t think so! It's worth keeping your eye on this country's welfare as it presses the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) to become Judenrein.

The Gentile Nations Versus Israel

Israel is the only nation to be singled out and challenged at the United Nations’ podium to nationally defend before all the nations of the world, the words of the God of Israel.

In October 1973, Yakov Malik, the Soviet ambassador to United Nations was representing his superpower nation when he made the following statement: “The Zionist have come forth with the theory of the chosen people, an absurd ideology. That is religious racism”. In his statement, Yakov Malik was calling God a racist from the United Nations’ pulpit. His statement was actually a racist statement against the Jewish religion and the sacred writings of the Holy Bible without knowing the Jewish-Judaism concept of what it means to be the chosen people, which is not racial superiority as Yakav Malik wanted to believe it meant. Through his political attack on the religion of Judaism and the Bible, we can see how the world political systems are directly tied into spiritual realities, for Malik placed together a supposedly political issue of Zionism along the religious topic of Israel being “chosen of God”.

Why would he combine a political and religious subject matter during a totally secular form, and at the United Nations of all places? He then described this spiritual aspect of being “chosen of God” as being politically-incorrect with overtones of charging Judaism as a religion of evil. While being emotionally charged by his anti-Semitic hatred, the Soviet ambassador went on to challenge the Israeli ambassador “to prove to the world” that the Jews are the chosen people of God. I wonder why there has never been any of the Christian nations of the world challenged by an ambassador of the world powers to prove they were the spiritual seed of Abraham, or that they are indeed the "elected of God" as the New Testament scripture states (I Peter 2:9)?

Also, why hasn't there been any Muslim government officials challenged by another government at the United Nations to prove any statement from their Koran or hadith concerning the Muslims replacing the Jews as the "chosen people" (sura 3:110)? Why is the tiny nation of Israel the only nation to be challenged in such a manner? There has to be some sort of an answer to this puzzling question.

On November 10, 1975 the UN General Assembly overwhelming approved the Resolution 3379 that proclaimed Zionism, to be “racism”! It is hard to understand the reasoning behind the UN’s decision of this when one considers the history of the United Nations. The United Nations voted in-favor on a Jewish State (a state-government operated by and for the Jewish people) in Palestine on November 29, 1947. Therefore, one would think that the United Nations was indeed in favor of a Jewish State. Apparently in the eyes of the United Nations it was acceptable for the Jewish people to have a state but not to add any spiritual significance into Jews coming to live within that Jewish state which is what Zionism is all about, and if they do, they will be considered racist!

A need for a Jewish safe haven after the Holocaust was the mindset behind the UN’s recognition for the birth of the Jewish secular state four years after the world war had ended in 1949. But twenty-six years later, if any Jew wished to take up the UN’s offer of the only Jewish safe haven in the world, he became a racist according to the UN! This vote of equating Zionism with racism that was passed by over a 2 to 1 margin (72-35) speaks volumes of how the United Nations views the rights of self-determination for the Jewish people in Israel and around the world. It is saying that if you are a Jew living outside of Israel, don’t move to the only place in the world where your people make up the majority of citizens and have a self-ruling government, and if you are a Jew living in Israel, do not do so for the sake of Zion, which is your ancient and spiritual heritage.

For Zion's sake will I not hold my peace, and for Jerusalem's sake I will not rest, until the righteousness thereof go forth as brightness, and the salvation thereof as a lamp that burneth. - Isaiah 62:1

On December 16, 1991 the UN General Assembly repealed anti-Semitic Resolution 3379. For some reason it took them sixteen years to figure out their resolution was too revealing of their true intent for the Jews of the world. At this point one might have thought that the UN finally grew some brains and discarded some of their anti-Semitic hatred. Always remember one thing about hatred towards God; that hatred may transform into another expression but it never goes away - it can’t!

About six years after Resolution 3379 was repealed, the “United Nation World Conference Against Racism” was proposed in 1997. This conference was set up in four stages and in four different regions from around the world including: Europe, Africa, South America, and Asia. Each region was to come up with their own declaration against racism along with a plan of action. The four regions would then combined their declarations into one final draft declaration against racism at the United Nation World Conference Against Racism in Durban, South Africa in 2001.

However, the fourth regional conference that was held in Tehran, Iran in February 2001 excluded just one UN member from participation which was supposedly contrary to the United Nations own procedures and principles (based on equality of all of its members) and international due process. Before I let the cat out of the bag as to what UN member was excluded, keep in mind that this was a world-wide conspired declaration against what? Racism! And here we have the whole stinking conference already excluding a fellow UN member due to race and religion! Can you even begin to image the hypocrisy?

I know you are wreaking your brain right now trying to figure out just what country could have possibly been unjustly discriminated against during this united world effort against racism of all things. Well, let me give you another little hint on this quiz (and of course I’m being facetious): The place from where this certain UN member was barred from participation in a conference against racism, (Tehran, Iran) was the same exact place where the president of Iran declared four years later in 2005 that this same UN barred member should be wiped off the map! How about that for working for a world without racism? And just what came out of this world effort against racism during its righteous conference you might ask?

What was the central theme at the grand finally conference in Durban, South Africa in September 2001? According to the conference participates, the world’s racist problem is solely due to the existence Israel and the way to fix the world’s racist problem is to dismantle Israel. There you have it, destroy Israel and world problems such as racism which are caused by the existence of Israel to begin with, goes away. This is a reoccurring theme among the world Jew-hater organizations and Jew-hater government institutions as was seen in Nazi Germany.

In this conference, Israel was accused of everything from carrying out: “holocausts, genocide, apartheid, to crimes against humanity, and of course, Zionism was characterized not only as racist but as a violent movement of racist supremacy and even Anti-Semitic itself! Just in case you didn’t know, God-haters and anti-Semites often reflect their own inner selves in their accusations against Jews.

Just one such example of this self-reflecting of victim / villain role switch was the Iranian leader Ahmadinejad at a pro-Palestinian rally in Tehran in October, 2006. Ahmadinejad, after supplying and supporting the Iranian-based terrorist organization of Hezbollah in their unprovoked attack on Israeli civilians in July and August 2006, charged the Israeli government as “a group of terrorists”. Hamas leaders has many times charged the Israelis as “Nazis” enough though Hitler’s Mein Kamph continues to be a high seller among the Palestinian and other Islamic peoples.

It was just four days later after this United Nation (Israel / Jew-bashing) conference on racism had ended in Durban that nineteen Jew-hating inspired Muslims killed 2819 innocent people on September 11, 2001 in what now is known as "9/11". How is that for timing? Just when the nations untied together in accusing Israel and Zionism of racial evil, Muslims gets the world’s attention by their Islamic "holy acts" of martyrdom to their Allah-god! I wonder if those nineteen terrorist of 9/11 and the many who assisted them felt more or less inspired about what they was planning to do after the outcome of the United Nation conference of racism?

In October 2003, just two years later after the Durban conference, a European Union survey was conducted at the request of the European Union Commission. Hundreds of people were surveyed from each of the EU's member nations which included 15 countries. The survey revealed that 59% of all Europeans believed that Israel is the greatest threat to world peace and is in-fact the most dangerous country on the earth. A year before that survey in 2002 a British survey was done by the Daily Telegraph revealed that the British public views Israel as one of the five “least friendly”, “least beautiful”, and “least deserving of international respect”. O yes, it is the presence Jews that causes even the land to be abhorred.

In September 2006, after Hezbollah unprovoked and out of the blue, entered into Israel’s sovereign UN recognized borders and killed eight Israeli servicemen and captured two more, and then started a 34-day racket barrage that sent nearly 4000 rockets into Israeli population centers, the Non-Aligned Movement that consist of 118 nations finished their summit in Cuba. The finial declaration of this 118 nation summit from mostly the African and South American continents consisted of two parts:
1. The condemnation of Israel for defending herself, by which the unprovoked Hezbollah kidnapping and rocket aggression upon non-military men, women, children, senior citizens, and infants was never cited.
2. Support of Iran’s nuclear ambitions (that would eventually include a strike on Israel) which should be resolved under the politically correct wording “peaceful resolution”.

Questions:

• Why does the European, Middle-Eastern, African, and South American societies have such views toward tiny Israel? Is it because of Israel’s past history of starting several wars? No, that couldn’t be it because Israel never has started a war, they usually finished them!

• Is it because Israel has threatened to blow other nation off the map with its nuclear weapon capabilities? No, Israel never has done that either, even to the other nations that has threatened them in this same exact manner.

• Maybe these societies feel hostile toward Israel because the Israelis are always marching by the tens of thousands in Tel-Aviv, Jerusalem, Haifa, Natanya, and Elat while wearing Klue Klux Klan like-alike hoods on their faces and burning another country’s flag, with shouts of destruction for that county whose flag they were burning, while camouflage-wearing Jewish children carry symbolic suicide bombs strapped around them? No, that couldn’t be it either. Even if Israel did do something like that, they would only be copying what all the Muslim countries around them who do to show their hatred towards Israel. And since these kind of activities are not condemned by the Europeans and other nations when the Muslim nations do it (such as Iran and the Palestinians), then surely the Europeans who view Israel as the most dangerous threat to world peace wouldn’t be bias against the Israelis for such activities?
  

• Maybe it’s because Judaism teaches their Jewish children to murder Gentiles in their children’s school text books and on Israeli ran TV children shows? Perhaps its because the Jewish mothers are encouraged to pass out candy with big smiles on their faces when their sons and daughters pull off a suicide mission killing as many Arab-Gentiles as possible? No, that’s not it either. Judaism doesn’t try to blend-in with Islam by mimicking its teachings along with the Palestinian culture of death being transmitted to children who can barely talk. > http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1729.htm and http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP157707
  

• Since we know the Europeans would never discriminate against the Jews of Israel without good cause, maybe the Europeans had a slip of the tongue when they voted that “Israel” was the most dangerous country in the world? Maybe they really meant to say it was Iran, Syria, or North Korea was the most dangerous country in the world since these countries hate Israel and the West and who would like nothing more than to see the annihilation of both Israel and America as they push for nuclear capabilities? One thing we know for sure is that the Jewish nation of Israel being viewed as most dangerous nation on earth by the Europeans was not due to the same European anti-Semitism that laid the foundation for the Holocaust. We know that is just not possible given their long history concerning the Jews. - I’m sorry, but sometimes being facetious makes more of a point than simply stating a simply fact.
  

After pondering these mysteries of world Israel / Jew hatred for approximately 2.4 seconds, I have came up with a suggestion, though it may just be a tiny bit of a radical one. Maybe, just maybe, a little bit of good old fashion “Nazism” has never left Europe? Maybe Hitler’s mindset still lingers around all over Europe? Maybe, just maybe, Hitler’s willing executioners of Europe gave birth to second generation of European willing executioners? Maybe Nazi agendas has taken hold on most the world governments?

Tell me that the lingering effects of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion that Hitler loved so much and that is still highly read in European countries, had no influence in this European anti-Israel survey! Tell me that Mein Kampf that is a best-seller in most all Muslims countries (I have heard second to only the Koran) have no bearing on the Muslim mind! Tell me that 1900 years of Christian anti-Semitic history has played no roll in the Europeans deciding what country is the most dangerous in their minds today. Go ahead and try Mr. Jew-hating European, please try!

A good way to evaluate the European’s decision on what country is the most dangerous in the world, is to ask the question, in whose company would they be welcomed by their decision, and just what kind of individuals would be in agreement with the Europeans that took this survey? For instance, how would Adolph Hitler himself had answered the exact same survey with the exact same questions if he was alive today? How would the leaders of the terrorist organization such as Hamas, Hezbolah, Islamic Jihad, and Al Queda vote if they had taken the survey? How would a man that has carried for years the title as the FBI’s Most Wanted have voted on such a survey? That's right, how would Osama bin Laden himself have voted on this same exact survey? I rest my case!

I wonder just how many of those 59% Europeans who deemed Israel as the most dangerous country in the world, and the average Muslim in any of the Islamic lands would fully support the following statement if it was unknown or even known to them who made the statement: "The Jew’s life… a parasite in the body of other nations" - Adolf Hitler

The Israeli columnist Amnon Lord wrote in 2002, “Anyone following the world press, especially the British and European, would reach the inevitable conclusion that the Israelis are the enemies of humanity.” It isn’t hard to prove that Lord’s statement couldn’t have been more true and not coming from a bias Israeli. Five years after Lord's statement on April 13, 2007 the UK's National Union of Journalists (NUJ) voted 66 to 54 for a boycott of Israeli goods at their annul meeting. Their reason for such a boycott? To protest against Israel in fighting Lebanon war and oppressing the Gaza Palestinians.

That’s right, the Israelis according the NUJ are oppressing the Gaza Palestinians by pulling out every Jewish soul of Gaza (making Gaza in the words of Nazi Germany, Judenrein) just twenty months earlier and according to the NUJ, Israel continues to oppress the Gaza Palestinians by receiving rocket fire from the Gaza Palestinians that land on Israel's inside-the-green-line cities!

According the the NUJ, Israel has also oppressed the Lebanese government by receiving 4,000 rockets that hit many Jewish cites and population centers and then having the audacity to militarily respond in defense at such rocket attacks. Therefore the NUJ in all of its media power, wishes to pressure the British government to impose sanctions on Israel and not the unprovoked Palestinian and Lebanese rocket firers who seek only Jewish civilian deaths!

I would like to add to Lord’s quote by stating the fact that: Anyone who follows the teachings of the Koran and the Islamic hadith would reach the same inevitable conclusion as anyone following the world press - that the Jews are indeed the enemies of humanity. Isn’t it a strange coincidence that Hitler, Islam, and the world media are united on this issue of the Jews and their role in humanity? I spiritually don’t think so. There is no doubt that there is a spiritual law involved in this phenomenon. Maybe, just maybe, it has something to do with them being chosen of God?

For thou art an holy people unto YHVH thy God, and YHVH hath chosen thee to be a peculiar people unto Himself, above all the nations that are upon the earth.
-Deuteronomy 14:2